Human intention recognition based on eyeball movement pattern and pupil size variation

To develop an efficient nonverbal human computer interaction system it is important to interpret the user's implicit intention, which is vague. According to cognitive visuo-motor theory, the human eye movements are a rich source of information about the human intention and behavior. According to Beatty's study, a task-evoked pupillary response is a consistent index of the human cognitive load and attention. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for a human's implicit intention recognition based on the eyeball movement pattern and pupil size variation. Based on the Bernard's research, we classify the human's implicit intention during a visual stimulus as informational and navigational intent. In the present study, the navigational intent refers to the human's idea to find some interesting objects in a visual input without a particular goal while the informational intent refers to the human's aspiration to find a particular object of interest. The proposed model utilizes the salient features of the eye such as fixation length, fixation count and pupil size variation as the inputs to classify the human's implicit intention. The experimental results show that the proposed model can achieve plausible recognition performance.

[1]  W. Levelt,et al.  Pupillary dilation as a measure of attention: a quantitative system analysis , 1993 .

[2]  D. Premack,et al.  Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? , 1978, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  Browsing in hypertext: a cognitive study , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[4]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Manual and gaze input cascaded (MAGIC) pointing , 1999, CHI '99.

[5]  J. Beatty Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. , 1982 .

[6]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupillometry: The Psychology of the Pupillary Response , 1978 .

[7]  Dario D. Salvucci Inferring intent in eye-based interfaces: tracing eye movements with process models , 1999, CHI '99.

[8]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of Web queries , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[9]  Peter Carruthers,et al.  The illusion of conscious will , 2007, Synthese.

[10]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  The dependence of crowding on flanker complexity and target-flanker similarity. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[11]  Manfred Velden,et al.  The pupillary response to mental overload , 1977 .

[12]  Claudio M. Privitera,et al.  The pupil dilation response to visual detection , 2008, Electronic Imaging.

[13]  M. Just,et al.  Eye fixations and cognitive processes , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Nicu Sebe,et al.  Multimodal Human Computer Interaction: A Survey , 2005, ICCV-HCI.

[15]  Daniel M. Russell,et al.  Discriminating the relevance of web search results with measures of pupil size , 2009, CHI.

[16]  Farrah Wong,et al.  Intention reading towards engineering applications for the elderly and people with disabilities , 2006 .

[17]  Robert J. K. Jacob,et al.  What you look at is what you get: eye movement-based interaction techniques , 1990, CHI '90.

[18]  Thomas Spyrou,et al.  Intention modelling: approximating computer user intentions for detection and prediction of intrusions , 1996, SEC.

[19]  Richard A. Bolt Eyes at the interface , 1982, CHI '82.

[20]  Kyung-Whan Oh,et al.  Intention Recognition using a Graph Representation , 2007 .

[21]  Kwang-Eun Ko,et al.  A study on hybrid model of HMMs and GMMs for mirror neuron system modeling using EEG signals , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2011).

[22]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Automated Eye-Movement Protocol Analysis , 2001, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[23]  Ricardo Carelli,et al.  Human-machine interfaces based on EMG and EEG applied to robotic systems , 2008, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[24]  E. Granholm,et al.  Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitations. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[25]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Alexander C. Schütz,et al.  Eye movements and perception: a selective review. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[27]  B. Goldwater Psychological significance of pupillary movements. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  Othman Omran Khalifa,et al.  EMG signal classification for human computer interaction: a review , 2009 .

[29]  Mircea Nicolescu,et al.  Vision-based hand pose estimation: A review , 2007, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[30]  S. Sutton,et al.  Pupillary Response at Visual Threshold , 1966, Nature.

[31]  Colin Ware,et al.  An evaluation of an eye tracker as a device for computer input2 , 1987, CHI 1987.

[32]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Cognitive eyes , 2004 .

[33]  Wei-Ying Ma,et al.  User Intention Modeling in Web Applications Using Data Mining , 2002, World Wide Web.

[34]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Information Seeking in Electronic Environments , 1995 .

[35]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Social interactions in HRI: the robot view , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[36]  Daniel E. Rose,et al.  Understanding user goals in web search , 2004, WWW '04.

[37]  Gerhard Tröster,et al.  Eye Movement Analysis for Activity Recognition Using Electrooculography , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.