Pharmacodynamic modeling of chemotherapeutic effects: Application of a transit compartment model to characterize methotrexate effects in vitro

The time course of chemotherapeutic effect is often delayed relative to the time course of chemotherapeutic exposure. In many cases, this delay is difficult to characterize mathematically through the use of standard pharmacodynamic models. In the present work, we investigated the relationship between methotrexate (MTX) exposure and the time course of MTX effects on tumor cell growth in culture. Two cancer cell lines, Ehrlich ascites cells and sarcoma 180 cells, were exposed for 24 hours to MTX concentrations that varied more than 700-fold (0.19–140 μg/mL). Viable cells were counted on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 20, 22, and 24 for Ehrlich ascites cells and on days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 19, and 21 for sarcoma 180 cells, through the use of a tetrazolium assay. Although MTX was removed 24 hours after application, cell numbers reached nadir values more than 100 hours after MTX exposure. Data from each cell line were fitted to 3 pharmacodynamic models of chemotherapeutic cell killing: a cell cycle phase-specific model, a phase-nonspecific model, and a transit compartment model (based on the general model recently reported by Mager and Jusko, Clin Pharmacol Ther. 70:210–216, 2001). The transit compartment model captured the data much more accurately than the standard pharmacodynamic models, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.86 to 0.999. This report shows the successful application of a transit compartment model for characterization of the complex time course of chemotherapeutic effects; such models may be very useful in the development of optimization strategies for cancer chemotherapy.

[1]  W J Jusko,et al.  Pharmacodynamic modeling of time‐dependent transduction systems , 2001, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[2]  William J. Jusko,et al.  A pharmacodynamic model for cell-cycle-specific chemotherapeutic agents , 1973, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[3]  J. Lokich,et al.  Dose intensity for bolus versus infusion chemotherapy administration: review of the literature for 27 anti-neoplastic agents. , 1997, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[4]  M. Karlsson,et al.  Model for time dependency of cytotoxic effect of CHS 828 in vitro suggests two different mechanisms of action. , 2001, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[5]  P. O'dwyer,et al.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the novel platinum analogue CI-973 on a 5-daily dose schedule. , 1992, Cancer research.

[6]  J. Aisner,et al.  A phase I trial of continuous infusion VP16-213 (Etoposide) , 2004, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[7]  M. Koyama,et al.  An improved colorimetric assay for interleukin 2. , 1986, Journal of immunological methods.

[8]  J. Bickers,et al.  Dose schedule and antitumor studies of arabinosyl cytosine (NSC 63878). , 1969, Cancer research.

[9]  W J Jusko,et al.  Transit compartments versus gamma distribution function to model signal transduction processes in pharmacodynamics. , 1998, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[10]  R. Lipton,et al.  Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of taxol. , 1987, Cancer research.

[11]  W R Greco,et al.  Modeling of the time-dependency of in vitro drug cytotoxicity and resistance. , 1998, Cancer research.

[12]  L B Sheiner,et al.  Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: application to d-tubocurarine. , 1980, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[13]  W. Evans,et al.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs in children. , 1993, Seminars in oncology.

[14]  H. Maurer,et al.  Growth kinetics of L1210 leukemic cells exposed to different concentration courses of methotrexate in vitro , 2004, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[15]  Varun Garg,et al.  Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses , 1993, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[16]  G. Peters,et al.  Schedule-dependent antitumor effect of gemcitabine in in vivo model system. , 1995, Seminars in oncology.

[17]  M. Karlsson,et al.  Semiphysiological model for the time course of leukocytes after varying schedules of 5-fluorouracil in rats. , 2000, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[18]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Relationships between carboplatin exposure and tumor response and toxicity in patients with ovarian cancer. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  J. Wanders,et al.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic relationships of the novel anticancer agent E7070 in four phase I studies , 2002 .

[20]  L. Grochow Busulfan disposition: the role of therapeutic monitoring in bone marrow transplantation induction regimens. , 1993, Seminars in oncology.

[21]  N. Saijo,et al.  Indirect‐response model for the time course of leukopenia with anticancer drugs , 1998, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[22]  J. Madelmont,et al.  Pharmacokinetic study of cystemustine, administered on a weekly schedule in cancer patients. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[23]  S. Baker,et al.  Clinical pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion topotecan in children: systemic exposure predicts hematologic toxicity. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  Y. Sasaki,et al.  Pharmacodynamic Modeling of the Entire Time Course of Leukopenia after a 3‐Hour Infusion of Paclitaxel , 2001, Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann.

[25]  J. Verweij,et al.  Population Pharmacokinetics/Toxicodynamics (PK/TD) Relationship of SAM486A in Phase I Studies in Patients with Advanced Cancers , 2000, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[26]  W J Jusko,et al.  Pharmacodynamics of chemotherapeutic effects: dose-time-response relationships for phase-nonspecific agents. , 1971, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[27]  M. Relling,et al.  Conventional compared with individualized chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  T. Nakamura,et al.  Evaluation of cell-killing effects of 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine and daunorubicin by a new computer-controlled in vitro pharmacokinetic simulation system. , 1999, Cancer research.

[29]  M. Terrissol,et al.  Chronotoxicity of methotrexate in mice after intraperitoneal administration. , 1987, Chronobiologia.