Cardiac CT for myocardial ischaemia detection and characterization--comparative analysis.

The assessment of patients presenting with symptoms of myocardial ischaemia remains one of the most common and challenging clinical scenarios faced by physicians. Current imaging modalities are capable of three-dimensional, functional and anatomical views of the heart and as such offer a unique contribution to understanding and managing the pathology involved. Evidence has accumulated that visual anatomical coronary evaluation does not adequately predict haemodynamic relevance and should be complemented by physiological evaluation, highlighting the importance of functional assessment. Technical advances in CT technology over the past decade have progressively moved cardiac CT imaging into the clinical workflow. In addition to anatomical evaluation, cardiac CT is capable of providing myocardial perfusion parameters. A variety of CT techniques can be used to assess the myocardial perfusion. The single energy first-pass CT and dual energy first-pass CT allow static assessment of myocardial blood pool. Dynamic cardiac CT imaging allows quantification of myocardial perfusion through time-resolved attenuation data. CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is showing promising diagnostic accuracy compared with the current reference modalities. The aim of this review is to present currently available myocardial perfusion techniques with a focus on CT imaging in light of recent clinical investigations. This article provides a comprehensive overview of currently available CT approaches of static and dynamic MPI and presents the results of corresponding clinical trials.

[1]  Craig I. Coleman,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography Versus Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography for Coronary Artery Disease: A Bivariate Meta-Analysis , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[2]  Habib Samady,et al.  Current concepts of integrated coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  R. Cury,et al.  Establishing a successful coronary CT angiography program in the emergency department: official writing of the Fellow and Resident Leaders of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (FiRST). , 2013, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[4]  Zhao-qi Zhang,et al.  Incremental value of dual-energy CT to coronary CT angiography for the detection of significant coronary stenosis: comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and single photon emission computed tomography , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[5]  M. Sanmartín,et al.  Evaluacion de la isquemia miocardica con tomografia computarizada de doble fuente: comparacion con la resonancia magnetica , 2013 .

[6]  J. Lima,et al.  CT-Based Myocardial Perfusion Imaging-Practical Considerations: Acquisition, Image Analysis, Interpretation, and Challenges , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular translational research.

[7]  K. Lipscomb,et al.  Effects of coronary stenoses on coronary flow reserve and resistance. , 1974, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  N. Kachenoura,et al.  Value of multidetector computed tomography evaluation of myocardial perfusion in the assessment of ischemic heart disease: comparison with nuclear perfusion imaging , 2009, European Radiology.

[9]  Jane Nixon,et al.  Comparison of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Women With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease From the Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary Heart Disease (CE-MARC) Trial , 2014, Circulation.

[10]  F. Sones,et al.  Cine-coronary arteriography. , 1962, The Ohio State medical journal.

[11]  U. Schoepf,et al.  Adenosine-Stress Dynamic Myocardial CT Perfusion Imaging: Initial Clinical Experience , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[12]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of substituting dual-energy CT for SPECT in the assessment of myocardial perfusion for the workup of coronary artery disease. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[13]  N. Wilke,et al.  Usefulness of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for coronary artery disease detection. , 2007, Minerva cardioangiologica.

[14]  R. Hendel,et al.  Regadenoson induces comparable left ventricular perfusion defects as adenosine: a quantitative analysis from the ADVANCE MPI 2 trial. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[15]  M. Kern,et al.  Coronary Pressure–Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements: Recommendations for Standardization, Recording, and Reporting as a Core Laboratory Technique. Proposals for Integration in Clinical Trials , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[16]  H. Higashino,et al.  Detection of myocardial ischemia using 64-slice MDCT. , 2009, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[17]  W. Hoffmann,et al.  Latest-generation catheterization systems enable invasive submillisievert coronary angiography , 2015, Herz.

[18]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Prospectively ECG-triggered rapid kV-switching dual-energy CT for quantitative imaging of myocardial perfusion. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[19]  I. Ringqvist,et al.  Survival of Medically Treated Patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry , 1982, Circulation.

[20]  R. Cury,et al.  Adenosine Stress High-Pitch 128-Slice Dual-Source Myocardial Computed Tomography Perfusion for Imaging of Reversible Myocardial Ischemia: Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[21]  Thomas H. Lee,et al.  Noninvasive Tests in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease , 2001 .

[22]  E. Ritman,et al.  Evaluation of Porcine Myocardial Microvascular Permeability and Fractional Vascular Volume Using 64-Slice Helical Computed Tomography (CT) , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[23]  M. Hamon,et al.  Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[24]  Bettina M. Gramer,et al.  Myocardium: dynamic versus single-shot CT perfusion imaging. , 2013, Radiology.

[25]  M. Oudkerk,et al.  CT of coronary heart disease: Part 1, CT of myocardial infarction, ischemia, and viability. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  C. Becker,et al.  CT stress perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically relevant coronary stenosis as defined by FFR , 2013, Heart.

[27]  J. Paul,et al.  Comparison of delayed enhancement patterns on multislice computed tomography immediately after coronary angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in acute myocardial infarction , 2008, Heart.

[28]  J. Lima,et al.  Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With 320-Row Detector Computed Tomography Accurately Detects Myocardial Ischemia in Patients With Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[29]  D. Berman,et al.  Comparison of the Short‐Term Survival Benefit Associated With Revascularization Compared With Medical Therapy in Patients With No Prior Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography , 2003, Circulation.

[30]  S. Petersen,et al.  Diagnostic performance of hyperaemic myocardial blood flow index obtained by dynamic computed tomography: does it predict functionally significant coronary lesions? , 2014, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[31]  E. Antman,et al.  ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionucl , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  B. De Bruyne,et al.  Experimental Basis of Determining Maximum Coronary, Myocardial, and Collateral Blood Flow by Pressure Measurements for Assessing Functional Stenosis Severity Before and After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty , 1993, Circulation.

[33]  Marc Kachelrieß,et al.  Dynamic Iterative Beam Hardening Correction (DIBHC) in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[34]  Elias Sanidas,et al.  Evolution of intravascular assessment of coronary anatomy and physiology: from ultrasound imaging to optical and flow assessment , 2013, European journal of clinical investigation.

[35]  D. Kereiakes,et al.  The composition and extent of coronary artery plaque detected by multislice computed tomographic angiography provides incremental prognostic value in patients with suspected coronary artery disease , 2012, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[36]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[37]  Sayan Sen,et al.  Fractional flow reserve-guided revascularization: practical implications of a diagnostic gray zone and measurement variability on clinical decisions. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[38]  U. Schoepf,et al.  Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[39]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve versus quantitative coronary angiography and noninvasive imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[40]  C. Boucher,et al.  Clinical practice. Noninvasive tests in patients with stable coronary artery disease. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  J. Lima,et al.  Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[42]  M. Reiser,et al.  CT detection of myocardial blood volume deficits: dual-energy CT compared with single-energy CT spectra. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[43]  M. Reiser,et al.  Optimal timing for first-pass stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[44]  R. Cury,et al.  Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[45]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[46]  Victor Mor-Avi,et al.  Detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities using ultra-low radiation dose regadenoson stress multidetector computed tomography. , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[47]  N. Kachenoura,et al.  Combined assessment of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion using multidetector computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[48]  Christopher M. Kramer,et al.  Prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[49]  Bernard J. Gersh,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2010 .

[50]  S. Kim,et al.  Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging using 128-slice dual-source CT: optimization of the CT protocol to reduce the radiation dose , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[51]  U. Schoepf,et al.  First-arterial-pass dual-energy CT for assessment of myocardial blood supply: do we need rest, stress, and delayed acquisition? Comparison with SPECT. , 2014, Radiology.

[52]  A novel analysis algorithm for potential quantitative assessment of myocardial computed tomography perfusion. , 2013, Academic radiology.

[53]  M. Budoff,et al.  Detection and quantification of myocardial perfusion defects by resting single-phase 64-slice cardiac computed tomography angiography compared with SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging , 2013, Coronary artery disease.

[54]  R. Cury,et al.  Dipyridamole stress and rest transmural myocardial perfusion ratio evaluation by 64 detector-row computed tomography. , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[55]  M. G. Levine,et al.  Functional assessment with electrocardiographic gated single-photon emission computed tomography improves the ability of technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging to predict myocardial viability in patients undergoing revascularization. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[56]  L. Cominacini,et al.  Role of MDCT coronary angiography in the clinical setting: economic implications , 2013, La radiologia medica.

[57]  T. Cook,et al.  Coronary and Cardiac Computed Tomography in the Emergency Room: Current Status and Future Directions , 2013, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[58]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Myocardial CT perfusion imaging in a large animal model: comparison of dynamic versus single-phase acquisitions. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[59]  M. Kern,et al.  The effects of ionic and nonionic radiographic contrast media on coronary hyperemia in patients during coronary angiography. , 1992, American heart journal.

[60]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion and viability from routine contrast-enhanced 16-detector-row computed tomography of the heart: preliminary results , 2005, European Radiology.

[61]  S. Ko,et al.  Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive anatomic and functional assessment with dual-source CT and adenosine-induced stress dual-energy CT for detection of significant coronary stenosis. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[62]  C. Berry,et al.  The role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). , 2013, Heart, lung & circulation.

[63]  Ernst Klotz,et al.  Stress myocardial perfusion: imaging with multidetector CT. , 2014, Radiology.

[64]  Nikola Jagic,et al.  Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[65]  J. Min,et al.  ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[66]  B. Gersh,et al.  Angiographic Versus Functional Severity of Coronary Artery Stenoses in the FAME Study: Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation , 2011 .

[67]  Ernst J. Rummeny,et al.  Dynamic CT Perfusion Imaging of the Myocardium: A Technical Note on Improvement of Image Quality , 2013, PloS one.

[68]  M. Chen,et al.  Paradoxical increase in lumen size during progression of coronary atherosclerosis: observations from the REVERSAL trial. , 2006, Atherosclerosis.

[69]  S. Walker,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of coronary heart disease: an economic evaluation using data from the CE-MARC study , 2013, Heart.

[70]  Guido Germano,et al.  Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic Burden: Results From the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy , 2008, Circulation.

[71]  P. Paré,et al.  Effect of contrast media on coronary vascular resistance: contrast-induced coronary vasodilation. , 1999, Chest.

[72]  S. Abbara,et al.  Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve , 2012 .

[73]  Mark D. Huffman,et al.  Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2013, Circulation.

[74]  Kia-Chong Chua,et al.  Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[75]  S. Ko,et al.  Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine-induced stress dual-energy computed tomography of the heart: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and conventional coronary angiography , 2010, European Radiology.

[76]  Bénédicte Belge,et al.  Characterization of Acute and Chronic Myocardial Infarcts by Multidetector Computed Tomography: Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance , 2006, Circulation.

[77]  城戸 輝仁 Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow using first-pass multidetector-row computed tomography and adenosine triphosphate in coronary artery disease , 2008 .

[78]  R. Cury,et al.  Evaluation of myocardial CT perfusion in patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department: comparison with SPECT-myocardial perfusion imaging , 2012, Heart.

[79]  Marc Kachelriess,et al.  Partial scan artifact reduction (PSAR) for the assessment of cardiac perfusion in dynamic phase-correlated CT , 2009, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[80]  Guang-Hong Chen,et al.  Noise spatial nonuniformity and the impact of statistical image reconstruction in CT myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2012, Medical physics.

[81]  M. Budoff,et al.  Myocardial hypo-enhancement on resting computed tomography angiography images accurately identifies myocardial hypoperfusion. , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[82]  T. Flohr,et al.  Accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography for the measurement of iodine concentration using cardiac CT protocols: validation in a phantom model , 2014, European Radiology.

[83]  M. Scheuering,et al.  Perfusion weighted color maps for enhanced visualization of myocardial infarction by MSCT: preliminary experience , 2008, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[84]  C. Fink,et al.  Adenosine-stress dynamic real-time myocardial perfusion CT and adenosine-stress first-pass dual-energy myocardial perfusion CT for the assessment of acute chest pain: initial results. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[85]  M. Vázquez,et al.  Myocardial ischemia evaluation with dual-source computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. , 2013, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[86]  H. Marques,et al.  Effective radiation dose of three diagnostic tests in cardiology: single photon emission computed tomography, invasive coronary angiography and cardiac computed tomography angiography. , 2013, Revista portuguesa de cardiologia : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia = Portuguese journal of cardiology : an official journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology.

[87]  C S Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data , 1983, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[88]  N. Pijls,et al.  Fractional flow reserve to guide coronary revascularization. , 2013, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[89]  M. Emond,et al.  Long‐term Survival of Medically Treated Patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry , 1994, Circulation.

[90]  U. Schoepf,et al.  Dual-energy computed tomography for integrative imaging of coronary artery disease: principles and clinical applications. , 2010, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[91]  I. Meredith,et al.  Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[92]  G. Bastarrika,et al.  Assessment of Left Atrial Volumes and Function in Orthotopic Heart Transplant Recipients by Dual-Source CT: Comparison With MRI , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[93]  E. Nagel,et al.  CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[94]  L. Shaw,et al.  ACCF/SCAI/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2012 appropriate use criteria for diagnostic catheterization: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American Association for Thor , 2012, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

[95]  M. Reiser,et al.  Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2011, Radiology.

[96]  T D Miller,et al.  Infarct size measured by single photon emission computed tomographic imaging with (99m)Tc-sestamibi: A measure of the efficacy of therapy in acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, Circulation.

[97]  Matthias P. Schönermark,et al.  CT coronary angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography in CHD , 2012, GMS health technology assessment.

[98]  M. Oudkerk,et al.  Dual-energy CT of the heart. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[99]  J E Edwards,et al.  Correlation of the Antemortem Coronary Arteriogram and the Postmortem Specimen , 1973, Circulation.

[100]  W. Wijns,et al.  On the inappropriateness of noninvasive multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to trigger coronary revascularization: a comparison with invasive angiography. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[101]  R. Nelson,et al.  Dual-energy multidetector CT: how does it work, what can it tell us, and when can we use it in abdominopelvic imaging? , 2010, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[102]  R. Cury,et al.  Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. , 2010, Radiology.

[103]  Young Jun Cho,et al.  Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging: performance of 3D semi-automated evaluation software , 2013, European Radiology.

[104]  Uwe Siebert,et al.  Clinical ResearchInterventional CardiologyFractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: 2-Year Follow-Up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Study , 2010 .

[105]  S. Chae,et al.  Independent and incremental prognostic value of exercise single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) thallium imaging in coronary artery disease. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[106]  A. Kurata,et al.  Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate stress multi-slice spiral computed tomography: alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. , 2005, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[107]  M. Hadamitzky,et al.  Prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiography during 5 years of follow-up in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. , 2012, European heart journal.

[108]  K. Iwasaki,et al.  Myocardial Perfusion Defect in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Demonstrated by 64‐Multidetector Computed Tomography at Rest , 2011, Clinical cardiology.

[109]  U. Schoepf,et al.  Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[110]  J. Hsieh,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of functionally relevant coronary artery stenoses with quantitative CT perfusion: preliminary clinical experiences , 2011, European Radiology.

[111]  Mark D. Huffman,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2013, Circulation.

[112]  Alexander Becker,et al.  CT imaging of myocardial perfusion: Possibilities and perspectives , 2013, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[113]  A. van Rossum,et al.  MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. , 2008, European heart journal.

[114]  T. Flohr,et al.  High-Temporal Resolution Dual-Energy Computed Tomography of the Heart Using a Novel Hybrid Image Reconstruction Algorithm: Initial Experience , 2011, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[115]  M. Siebes,et al.  Fractional flow reserve as a surrogate for inducible myocardial ischaemia , 2013, Nature Reviews Cardiology.