Evaluation of the deformation and corresponding dosimetric implications in prostate cancer treatment

The cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging modality is an integral component of image-guided adaptive radiation therapy (IGART), which uses patient-specific dynamic/temporal information for potential treatment plan modification. In this study, an offline process for the integral component IGART framework has been implemented that consists of deformable image registration (DIR) and its validation, dose reconstruction, dose accumulation and dose verification. This study compares the differences between planned and estimated delivered doses under an IGART framework of five patients undergoing prostate cancer radiation therapy. The dose calculation accuracy on CBCT was verified by measurements made in a Rando pelvic phantom. The accuracy of DIR on patient image sets was evaluated in three ways: landmark matching with fiducial markers, visual image evaluation and unbalanced energy (UE); UE has been previously demonstrated to be a feasible method for the validation of DIR accuracy at a voxel level. The dose calculated on each CBCT image set was reconstructed and accumulated over all fractions to reflect the 'actual dose' delivered to the patient. The deformably accumulated (delivered) plans were then compared to the original (static) plans to evaluate tumor and normal tissue dose discrepancies. The results support the utility of adaptive planning, which can be used to fully elucidate the dosimetric impact based on the simulated delivered dose to achieve the desired tumor control and normal tissue sparing, which may be of particular importance in the context of hypofractionated radiotherapy regimens.

[1]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Adaptive Radiation Therapy: Technical Components and Clinical Applications , 2011, Cancer journal.

[2]  M. Goitein,et al.  Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic function. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Di Yan,et al.  Adaptive radiation therapy for prostate cancer. , 2010, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[4]  Indrin J Chetty,et al.  Analysis of outcomes in radiation oncology: an integrated computational platform. , 2009, Medical physics.

[5]  Lei Xing,et al.  Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam CT (CBCT)-based dose calculation , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  M van Herk,et al.  Quantification and predictors of prostate position variability in 50 patients evaluated with multiple CT scans during conformal radiotherapy. , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  D. Jaffray,et al.  Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter. , 2001, Medical physics.

[8]  Huaiqun Guan,et al.  Dose calculation accuracy using cone-beam CT (CBCT) for pelvic adaptive radiotherapy , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  David Jaffray,et al.  Online image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: How much improvement can we expect? A theoretical assessment of clinical benefits and potential dose escalation by improving precision and accuracy of radiation delivery. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  L. Kestin,et al.  Confirmation of a low α/β ratio for prostate cancer treated by external beam radiation therapy alone using a post-treatment repeated-measures model for PSA dynamics. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  S. Thomas,et al.  Relative electron density calibration of CT scanners for radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  S Webb,et al.  Optimum parameters in a model for tumour control probability, including interpatient heterogeneity: evaluation of the log-normal distribution , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  F Foppiano,et al.  Fitting late rectal bleeding data using different NTCP models: results from an Italian multi-centric study (AIROPROS0101). , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  J. Van Dyk,et al.  A quality assurance phantom for three-dimensional radiation treatment planning. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  D. Brenner,et al.  Direct evidence that prostate tumors show high sensitivity to fractionation (low α/β ratio), similar to late-responding normal tissue , 2002 .

[16]  Qiuwen Wu,et al.  Geometric and dosimetric evaluations of an online image-guidance strategy for 3D-CRT of prostate cancer. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Jeremy MG Taylor,et al.  Use of individual fraction size data from 3756 patients to directly determine the alpha/beta ratio of prostate cancer. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Indrin J Chetty,et al.  Analysis of deformable image registration accuracy using computational modeling. , 2010, Medical physics.

[19]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Dosimetric feasibility of cone-beam CT-based treatment planning compared to CT-based treatment planning. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  Lei Dong,et al.  Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  G Morton,et al.  Target position variability throughout prostate radiotherapy. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  George Starkschall,et al.  Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M. D. Anderson phase III randomized trial. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  Hualiang Zhong,et al.  FEM-based evaluation of deformable image registration for radiation therapy , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  D. Hallahan,et al.  A study on adaptive IMRT treatment planning using kV cone-beam CT. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[25]  L. Kestin,et al.  Use of Individual Fraction Size Data from 3756 Patients to Directly Determine the α/β Ratio of Prostate Cancer , 2007 .

[26]  Joos V Lebesque,et al.  An adaptive off-line procedure for radiotherapy of prostate cancer. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  Optimum parameters in a model for tumour control probability, including interpatient heterogeneity: evaluation of the log-normal distribution , 2007 .

[28]  William Y Song,et al.  Evaluation of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) technologies and their impact on the outcomes of hypofractionated prostate cancer treatments: a radiobiologic analysis. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  Lei Xing,et al.  Formulating adaptive radiation therapy (ART) treatment planning into a closed-loop control framework , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  Hua Li,et al.  Onboard cone beam CT with flexible image trajectories to improve image quality and longitudinal coverage: simulation and phantom study , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[31]  Joos V Lebesque,et al.  Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: results of the Dutch multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with 78 Gy. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  Lei Dong,et al.  Investigation of bladder dose and volume factors influencing late urinary toxicity after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[33]  S Webb,et al.  A model for calculating tumour control probability in radiotherapy including the effects of inhomogeneous distributions of dose and clonogenic cell density. , 1993, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  Timothy Solberg,et al.  Multi-institutional clinical experience with the Calypso System in localization and continuous, real-time monitoring of the prostate gland during external radiotherapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.