Artificial neural networks are able to recognize gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients solely on the basis of clinical data

Background Artificial neural networks (ANN) are modelling mechanisms that are highly flexible and adaptive to solve the non-linearity inherent in the relationship between symptoms and underlying pathology. Objectives To assess the efficacy of ANN in achieving a diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) using oesophagoscopy or pH-metry as a diagnostic gold standard and discriminant analysis as a statistical comparator technique in a group of patients with typical GORD symptoms and with or without GORD objective findings (e.g. a positive oesophagoscopy or a pathological oesophageal pH-metry). Methods The sample of 159 cases (88 men, 71 women) presenting with typical symptoms of GORD, were subdivided on the basis of endoscopy and pH-metry results into two groups: GORD patients with or without oesophagitis, group 1 (N=103), and pH and endoscopy-negative patients in whom both examinations were negative, group 2 (N=56). A total of 101 different independent variables were collected: demographic information, medical history, generic health state and lifestyle, intensity and frequency of typical and atypical symptoms based on the Italian version of the Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (Mayo Clinic). The diagnosis was used as a dependent variable. Different ANN models were assessed. Results Specific evolutionary algorithms selected 45 independent variables, concerning clinical and demographic features, as predictors of the diagnosis. The highest predictive performance was achieved by a ‘back propagation’ ANN, which was consistently 100% accurate in identifying the correct diagnosis compared with 78% obtained by traditional discriminant analysis. Conclusion On the basis of this preliminary work, the use of ANN seems to be a promising approach for predicting diagnosis without the need for invasive diagnostic methods in patients suffering from GORD symptoms.

[1]  I. Månsson,et al.  The prevalence of symptoms suggestive of esophageal disorders. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[2]  A. Zinsmeister,et al.  A new questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease. , 1994, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[3]  Patrick van der Smagt,et al.  Introduction to neural networks , 1995, The Lancet.

[4]  W. Baxt Application of artificial neural networks to clinical medicine , 1995, The Lancet.

[5]  A. Hungin,et al.  Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care in Europe: Clinical presentation and endoscopic findings , 1995 .

[6]  F. Campbell,et al.  Importance of reflux symptoms in functional dyspepsia. , 1995, Gut.

[7]  M Buscema,et al.  Artificial neural networks and complex social systems. I. Theory. , 1998, Substance use & misuse.

[8]  M Buscema,et al.  Self-recurrent neural network. , 1998, Substance use & misuse.

[9]  P J Kahrilas,et al.  An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management — the Genval Workshop Report , 1998, Gut.

[10]  Paolo Massimo Buscema,et al.  Feedforward networks in financial predictions: the future that modifies the present , 2000, Expert Syst. J. Knowl. Eng..

[11]  J. Dayhoff,et al.  Artificial neural networks , 2001, Cancer.

[12]  S. Castellaro,et al.  An artificial intelligence approach to classify and analyse EEG traces , 2002, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  Mattias Ohlsson,et al.  Neural networks – a diagnostic tool in acute myocardial infarction with concomitant left bundle branch block , 2002, Clinical physiology and functional imaging.

[14]  R. Peled,et al.  Prediction of emergency department visits for respiratory symptoms using an artificial neural network. , 2002, Chest.

[15]  D. Piccolo,et al.  Clinical and Laboratory Investigations Dermoscopic diagnosis by a trained clinician vs. a clinician with minimal dermoscopy training vs. computer-aided diagnosis of 341 pigmented skin lesions: a comparative study , 2002 .

[16]  Noam Harpaz,et al.  Artificial neural networks distinguish among subtypes of neoplastic colorectal lesions. , 2002, Gastroenterology.

[17]  J. Dent Definitions of reflux disease and its separation from dyspepsia , 2002, Gut.

[18]  D. Hollander Is artificial intelligence an intelligent choice for gastroenterologists? , 2003, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[19]  M Buscema,et al.  Contribution of artificial neural networks to the classification and treatment of patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia. , 2003, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[20]  C. Tinelli,et al.  Prevalence and Impact of Symptoms Suggestive of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease , 1999, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[21]  D. Drossman,et al.  Rome III: The Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders , 2006 .