Classical mean-variance model revisited: pseudo efficiency

Investigating the inverse problem of the classical Markowitz mean-variance formulation: Given a mean-variance pair, find initial investment levels and their corresponding portfolio policies such that the given mean-variance pair can be realized, we reveal that any mean-variance pair inside the reachable region can be achieved by multiple portfolio policies associated with different initial investment levels. Therefore, in the mean-variance world for a market of all risky assets, the common belief of monotonicity: ‘The larger you invest, the larger expected future wealth you can expect for a given risk (variance) level’ does not hold, which stimulates us to extend the classical two-objective mean-variance framework to an expanded three-objective framework: to maximize the mean and minimize the variance of the final wealth as well as to minimize the initial investment level. As a result, we eliminate from the policy candidate list the set of pseudo efficient policies that are efficient in the original mean-variance space, but inefficient in this newly introduced three-dimensional objective space.

[1]  Duan Li,et al.  Optimal Dynamic Portfolio Selection: Multiperiod Mean‐Variance Formulation , 2000 .

[2]  G. Vechkanov Investments , 2014, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[3]  Marc C. Steinbach,et al.  Markowitz Revisited: Mean-Variance Models in Financial Portfolio Analysis , 2001, SIAM Rev..

[4]  X. Zhou,et al.  Continuous-Time Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection: A Stochastic LQ Framework , 2000 .

[5]  J. Lintner THE VALUATION OF RISK ASSETS AND THE SELECTION OF RISKY INVESTMENTS IN STOCK PORTFOLIOS AND CAPITAL BUDGETS , 1965 .

[6]  P. Boyle,et al.  Explicit Representation of Cost-Efficient Strategies , 2010 .

[7]  D. White Mean-Variance Analysis in Infinite Horizon Non-Discounted Markov Decision Processes: Technical Note , 1995 .

[8]  J. Mossin EQUILIBRIUM IN A CAPITAL ASSET MARKET , 1966 .

[9]  J. Tobin Liquidity Preference as Behavior towards Risk , 1958 .

[10]  W. Sharpe CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK* , 1964 .

[11]  D. J. White,et al.  Epsilon-dominating solutions in mean-variance portfolio analysis , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Hans G. Ehrbar Mean-variance efficiency when investors are not required to invest all their money , 1990 .

[13]  F. Black Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted Borrowing , 1972 .

[14]  A. Stuart,et al.  Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments , 1959 .

[15]  H. Markowitz The optimization of a quadratic function subject to linear constraints , 1956 .

[16]  Xiaoxia Huang,et al.  Portfolio Analysis , 1967, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[17]  D. White Mean, variance, and probabilistic criteria in finite Markov decision processes: A review , 1988 .

[18]  W. Sharpe,et al.  Mean-Variance Analysis in Portfolio Choice and Capital Markets , 1987 .

[19]  Kenneth N. Levy,et al.  The Long and Short on Long-Short , 1997 .

[20]  J. Vörös,et al.  Portfolio analysis--an analytic derivation of the efficient portfolio frontier , 1986 .

[21]  Jack L. Treynor,et al.  MUTUAL FUND PERFORMANCE* , 2007 .

[22]  Harry M. Markowitz,et al.  Trimability and Fast Optimization of Long–Short Portfolios , 2006 .

[23]  Hans G. Ehrbar A REVISED GEOMETRY OF MEAN‐VARIANCE EFFICIENT PORTFOLIOS , 1993 .