[Musculoskeletal biomechanics of the knee joint. Principles of preoperative planning for osteotomy and joint replacement].

The long-term clinical outcome of surgical interventions at the knee is dependent upon the quality of the restoration of normal function, together with moderate musculoskeletal loading conditions. In order to achieve this, it is essential to consider biomechanical knowledge during the planning and execution of the procedures. Until now, such knowledge has only been available in books and journal manuscripts and is merely considered during preoperative planning. Its transfer into the specific intraoperative situation is, however, primarily dependent upon the surgeon's skills and understanding. Mathematical models hold the potential to provide the surgeon with detailed, patient-specific information on the in vivo forces, as well as their spatial and temporal distribution. Their application in clinical routine, however, requires a comprehensive validation. Based on a model validated against patient data, it has been shown that - mainly as a result of the action of the muscles - both the tibiofemoral as well as the patellofemoral joints experience substantial mechanical loads even during normal activities of daily living. The calculations further indicate that malalignment at the knee in the frontal plane of more than approximately 4 degrees results in considerably increased forces across the tibiofemoral joint. The actual change in force to a given degree of malalignment might, however, vary greatly between subjects. In order to additionally determine the distribution of the forces in more detail, a sufficiently accurate model of knee joint kinematics is required. In combination with MR-based in vivo imaging techniques, new mathematical models offer the possibility to capture the individual characteristics of knee kinematics and might additionally allow the effect of muscle activity on joint kinematics to be considered. By implementing these technologies in preoperative planning and navigation systems, up-to-date biomechanical knowledge can be made available at the surgeons' fingertips. We propose that optimizing the biomechanical conditions through using these approaches will allow the long-term function of the replaced joint to be significantly enhanced.

[1]  E. Kellis Tibiofemoral joint forces during maximal isokinetic eccentric and concentric efforts of the knee flexors. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  Studies of human locomotion: past, present and future. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  M G Pandy,et al.  Static and dynamic optimization solutions for gait are practically equivalent. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  William R Taylor,et al.  Tibio‐femoral loading during human gait and stair climbing , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Die Belastung orthopädischer Implantate , 2007, Der Orthopäde.

[6]  Thomas P Andriacchi,et al.  Mechanical loads at the knee joint during deep flexion , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[7]  Walter Herzog,et al.  Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  A B Zavatsky,et al.  Parameter sensitivity of a mathematical model of the anterior cruciate ligament , 1997, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[9]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Georg N. Duda,et al.  The influence of alignment on the musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the knee , 2003, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[11]  J. O'Connor,et al.  The variation in the orientations and moment arms of the knee extensor and flexor muscle tendons with increasing muscle force: A mathematical analysis , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[12]  R. Brand,et al.  Comparison of hip force calculations and measurements in the same patient. , 1994, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  Jennifer M Scarvell,et al.  Development of the concepts of knee kinematics. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Mohamed Mahfouz,et al.  Knee mechanics: a review of past and present techniques to determine in vivo loads. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  E. Chao,et al.  Application of optimization principles in determining the applied moments in human leg joints during gait. , 1973, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  L. Blankevoort,et al.  Validation of a three-dimensional model of the knee. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  M O Heller,et al.  A new model to predict in vivo human knee kinematics under physiological-like muscle activation. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  L. Sharma,et al.  The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis. , 2001, JAMA.

[19]  M. S. Hefzy,et al.  3-D anatomically based dynamic modeling of the human knee to include tibio-femoral and patello-femoral joints. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[20]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  Hanna Schell,et al.  On the influence of soft tissue coverage in the determination of bone kinematics using skin markers , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[22]  T L Shercliff,et al.  The Geometry of the Knee in the Sagittal Plane , 1989, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[23]  R. Brand,et al.  The sensitivity of muscle force predictions to changes in physiologic cross-sectional area. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.