Mean F0 values obtained through standard phrase pronunciation compared with values obtained from the normal work environment: a study on teacher and child voices performed in a preschool environment.

Mean fundamental frequency (F(0)) values are often used in research on vocal load. In this study, we examine how the mean F(0) differs when evaluated through pronouncing a standard phrase as compared to the mean F(0) obtained in a real work/play environment. We also examine how the F(0) values change throughout the day. The study was performed in a preschool, nine adult female preschool teachers and 11 children participated. The participants wore a digital recorder equipped with an accelerometer, which was attached to the neck. In the study, the participant first pronounced a standard phrase in a controlled environment; thereafter, the voice was recorded in the environment where both children and adults normally reside throughout the day, denoted by the work/play environment. For each participant, the procedure was repeated four times throughout the day. Analyses showed that the F(0) values of the children's and adult's voices were significantly higher when recorded in the work/play environment as compared to the controlled environment. The average difference was 36 Hz for adults and 24 Hz for children. Previous studies have shown an increase of F(0) over the day for teachers. In this study, an increase between morning and afternoon values was found amounting to 8 Hz for adults and 24 Hz for children. For the child population, this increase was statistically significant. However, the total changes over the day revealed a somewhat more complex scheme, with an increase of F(0) in the morning, a decrease during lunch, and finally an increase in the afternoon. This pattern was verified statistically for the joint child-adult population.

[1]  M. Maclagan,et al.  Vocal fatigue: current knowledge and future directions. , 2003, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[2]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Occupational voice complaints and objective acoustic measurements—do they correlate? , 2006, Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology.

[3]  Udo Zoelzer,et al.  DAFX: Digital Audio Effects , 2011 .

[4]  P. Alku,et al.  Effects of prolonged oral reading on F0, SPL, subglottal pressure and amplitude characteristics of glottal flow waveforms. , 1999, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[5]  Susan Thibeault,et al.  Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[6]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Changes in objective acoustic measurements and subjective voice complaints in call center customer-service advisors during one working day. , 2008, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[7]  J. Stemple,et al.  Objective measures of voice production in normal subjects following prolonged voice use. , 1995, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[8]  Ingo R. Titze,et al.  Technical considerations in the design of a wearable voice dosimeter , 2002 .

[9]  Svante Granqvist,et al.  The self-to-other ratio applied as a phonation detector for voice accumulation , 2003, Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology.

[10]  Erkki Vilkman,et al.  Relationships between self-evaluations of voice and working conditions, background factors, and phoniatric findings in female teachers , 2009, Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology.

[11]  P. van de Heyning,et al.  Predicting vocal outcome by means of a vocal endurance test: A 5‐year follow‐up study in female teachers , 1998, The Laryngoscope.

[12]  Ingo R Titze,et al.  Voicing and silence periods in daily and weekly vocalizations of teachers. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  I. Titze,et al.  Objective Measurement of Vocal Fatigue in Classical Singers: A Vocal Dosimetry Pilot Study , 2006, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[14]  Robert E Hillman,et al.  Ambulatory Monitoring of Disordered Voices , 2006, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[15]  J. Sundberg,et al.  Child voice and noise: a pilot study of noise in day cares and the effects on 10 children's voice quality according to perceptual evaluation. , 2009, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[16]  Robert E Hillman,et al.  Development and testing of a portable vocal accumulator. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[17]  E. Vilkman,et al.  Voice changes during work: subjective complaints and objective measurements for female primary and secondary schoolteachers. , 2002, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[18]  C. Starr,et al.  Vocal fatigue among teachers. , 1993, Folia phoniatrica.

[19]  P. Alku,et al.  Ergonomic conditions and voice: Paper presented at PEVOC-II conference, August 29-31 1997, in Regensburg, Germany , 1998 .

[20]  H. Kingma,et al.  Vocal load as measured by the voice accumulator. , 1995, Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics.

[21]  Maria Södersten,et al.  Methods to study pre-school teachers' voice at work: simultaneous recordings with a voice accumulator and a DAT recorder , 2003, Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology.

[22]  J. Pentti,et al.  The prevalence of voice disorders among day care center teachers compared with nurses: a questionnaire and clinical study. , 2001, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[23]  S. Ternström,et al.  Loud speech in realistic environmental noise: phonetogram data, perceptual voice quality, subjective ratings, and gender differences in healthy speakers. , 2005, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[24]  Annika Szabo,et al.  A voice accumulator device: Evaluation based on studio and field recordings , 2001, Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology.

[25]  B. Fritzell,et al.  Voice disorders and occupations , 1996 .

[26]  Erkki Vilkman,et al.  Acoustic measures and self-reports of vocal fatigue by female teachers. , 2008, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[27]  E. Smith,et al.  Frequency of voice problems among teachers and other occupations. , 1998, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[28]  Maria Södersten,et al.  Vocal behavior and vocal loading factors for preschool teachers at work studied with binaural DAT recordings. , 2002, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[29]  Anders Löfqvist,et al.  A Voice Accumulator—Validation and Application , 1989 .

[30]  Anne-Maria Laukkanen,et al.  Vocal Loading-Related Changes in Male Teachers’ Voices Investigated before and after a Working Day , 2006, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[31]  J. Sundberg,et al.  Relationship between changes in voice pitch and loudness , 1988 .

[32]  J. Švec,et al.  Protocol challenges for on-the-job voice dosimetry of teachers in the United States and Finland. , 2007, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[33]  Paavo Alku,et al.  The Effects of Post-Loading Rest on Acoustic Parameters with Special Reference to Gender and Ergonomic Factors , 2001, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.