On Senders’s Models of Visual Sampling Behavior

OBJECTIVE We review the sampling models described in John Senders's doctoral thesis on "visual sampling processes" via a ready and accessible exposition. BACKGROUND John Senders left a significant imprint on human factors/ergonomics (HF/E). Here, we focus on one preeminent aspect of his career, namely visual attention. METHODS We present, clarify, and expand the models in his thesis through computer simulation and associated visual illustrations. RESULTS One of the key findings of Senders's work on visual sampling concerns the linear relationship between signal bandwidth and visual sampling rate. The models that are used to describe this relationship are the periodic sampling model (PSM), the random constrained sampling model (RCM), and the conditional sampling model (CSM). A recent replication study that used results from modern eye-tracking equipment showed that Senders's original findings are manifestly replicable. CONCLUSIONS Senders's insights and findings withstand the test of time and his models continue to be both relevant and useful to the present and promise continued impact in the future. APPLICATION The present paper is directed to stimulate a broad spectrum of researchers and practitioners in HF/E and beyond to use these important and insightful models.

[1]  John W. Senders,et al.  The Human Operator as a Monitor and Controller of Multidegree of Freedom Systems , 1964 .

[2]  Joost C. F. de Winter,et al.  Determinants of take-over time from automated driving: A meta-analysis of 129 studies , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[3]  P A Hancock,et al.  On the Dynamics of Conspicuity , 2019, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Lawrence J. Fogel,et al.  A note on the sampling theorem , 1955, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[5]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Take-Over Time in Highly Automated Vehicles , 2018, Driver Reactions to Automated Vehicles.

[6]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  M. M. van Paassen,et al.  Design of Forcing Functions for the Identification of Human Control Behavior , 2010 .

[8]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  A Review of Quasi-Linear Pilot Models , 1967 .

[9]  Yke Bauke Eisma,et al.  Visual Sampling Processes Revisited: Replicating and Extending Senders (1983) Using Modern Eye-Tracking Equipment , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[10]  Mehdi Saffarian,et al.  Measuring drivers’ visual information needs during braking: A simulator study using a screen-occlusion method , 2015 .

[11]  Experimental study of statistical characteristics of filtered random noise , 1949 .

[12]  Yanghe Feng,et al.  Human performance modeling and its uncertainty factors affecting decision making: a survery , 2020, Soft Computing.

[13]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Situation awareness based on eye movements in relation to the task environment , 2018, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[14]  John W. Senders,et al.  A Re-Analysis of the Pilot Eye-Movement Data , 1966 .

[15]  G. Box Science and Statistics , 1976 .

[16]  T. O. Kvålseth Human information processing in visual sampling. , 1978, Ergonomics.

[17]  Daniel R. Little,et al.  Small is beautiful: In defense of the small-N design , 2018, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[18]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Measurement error and the replication crisis , 2017, Science.

[19]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  On How Often the Supervisor Should Sample , 1970, IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern..

[20]  P A Hancock,et al.  Automation: how much is too much? , 2014, Ergonomics.

[21]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Takeover Time in Highly Automated Vehicles: Noncritical Transitions to and From Manual Control , 2017, Hum. Factors.

[22]  Alexander Etz,et al.  Making replication mainstream , 2017, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  J. R. Carbonell A Queueing Model of Many-Instrument Visual Sampling , 1966 .

[24]  N. Langer,et al.  Eye Tracking in the Wild: Piloting a Real-Life Assessment Paradigm for Older Adults , 2019, Journal of eye movement research.

[25]  J I Elkind,et al.  An investigation of the visual sampling behaviour of human observers. NASA Contract Rep NASA CR-434. , 1966, NASA contractor report. NASA CR. United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[26]  Jaime R. Carbonell,et al.  A Queueing Model of Visual Sampling Experimental Validation , 1968 .