A parametric model for the efficiency of a flare in crosswind

Despite the prevalence of gas flares used throughout the world, there are limited data to address concerns over their efficiencies and emissions. This paper has two main objectives. The first is to present experimental data from diffusion flames in crosswinds to elucidate the relative importance of parameters that affect their carbon conversion efficiency (η). Drawing on these data, the second objective is to develop empirical models to estimate the efficiency of flares. Physical parameters shown to be important are fuel type, wind speed ( U ∞ ), exit velocity ( V j ), stack outsidediameter ( d o ), fraction of inert diluent in the fuel stream, and the specific energy content of the fuel mixture (expressed here as the lower heating value, LHV mass ). Experiments revealed that increasing the amount of diluent in the fuel has a profound effect on inefficiency (1-η) in that reduced energy density flames become much more susceptible to the effects of the crosswind. A model was developed to correlate experimental data spanning 2 m/s ≤ U ∞ ≤17 m/s, 0.5 m/s ≤V j ≤4 m/s, 12.2 mm ≤ d o ≤49.8 mm with fuel dilutions using CO 2 or N 2 of up to 80% (by volume). This model is ( 1 − η ) ⋅ ( LHV mass ) 3 = A ⋅ exp ⁡ ( B U ∞ ( g V j d o ) 1 3 ) where A and B are coefficients and U ∞ /(gV j d o ) 1/3 is a dimensionless parameter based on the Richardson number which emphasizes the importance of the specific energy density of the fuel stream. Separate coefficients were needed to describe natural-gas- and propane- or ethane-based flare streams such that for natural gas, A =156.4 (MJ/kg) 3 and B =0.318, and for propane and ethane, A =32.06 (MJ/kg) 3 and B =0.272. Given that data from natural-gas- and propane- or ethane-based flares did not follow a single correlation, coupled with the fact that the natural gas correlation could be slightly improved with d o 1/2 , suggests that there may be different underlying mechanisms that lead to the inefficiecies for these fuels that need further exploration.

[1]  D. Wilson,et al.  A FUEL STRIPPING MECHANISM FOR WAKE-STABILIZED JET DIFFUSION FLAMES IN CROSSFLOW , 2001 .

[2]  Rong Fung Huang,et al.  Characteristic flow modes of wake-stabilized jet flames in a transverse air stream , 1999 .

[3]  M R Johnson,et al.  A Characterization of Solution Gas Flaring in Alberta , 2001, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[4]  G. Kalghatgi Blow-Out Stability of Gaseous Jet Diffusion Flames Part II: Effect of Cross Wind , 1981 .

[5]  T. A. Brzustowski,et al.  Flaring in the energy industry , 1976 .

[6]  Larry W. Kostiuk,et al.  The use of a closed-loop wind tunnel for measuring the combustion efficiency of flames in a cross flow , 1999 .

[7]  S. Gollahalli,et al.  Burner Wake Stabilized Gas Jet Flames in Cross-Flow , 1995 .

[8]  Larry W. Kostiuk,et al.  Efficiencies of low-momentum jet diffusion flames in crosswinds , 2000 .

[9]  Gautam Kalghatgi,et al.  The visible shape and size of a turbulent hydrocarbon jet diffusion flame in a cross-wind , 1983 .

[10]  William M. Pitts,et al.  Assessment of theories for the behavior and blowout of lifted turbulent jet diffusion flames , 1989 .

[11]  David E. Foster,et al.  Total Soot Yield from a Propane Diffusion Flame in Cross-Flow , 1990 .

[12]  Rong Fung Huang,et al.  The stability and visualized flame and flow structures of a combusting jet in cross flow , 1994 .

[13]  M. Mungal,et al.  Observations on the stabilization region of lifted non-premixed methane transverse jet flames , 1998 .

[14]  Mel T Strosher Characterization of Emissions from Diffusion Flare Systems , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[15]  Bruce A. Tichenor,et al.  Combustion Efficiency of Flares , 1986 .