International telepathology consultation: Three years of experience between the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and KingMed Diagnostics in China

Background: Telepathology is increasingly being employed to support diagnostic consultation services. Prior publications have addressed technology aspects for telepathology, whereas this paper will address the clinical telepathology experience of KingMed Diagnostics, the largest independent pathology medical laboratory in China. Beginning in 2012 the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) and KingMed Diagnostics partnered to establish an international telepathology consultation service. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study that summarizes the telepathology experience and diagnostic consultation results between UPMC and KingMed over a period of 3 years from January 2012 to December 2014. Results: A total of 1561 cases were submitted for telepathology consultation including 144 cases in 2012, 614 cases in 2013, and 803 in 2014. Most of the cases (61.4%) submitted were referred by pathologists, 36.9% by clinicians, and 1.7% by patients in China. Hematopathology received the most cases (23.7%), followed by bone/soft tissue (21.0%) and gynecologic/breast (20.2%) subspecialties. Average turnaround time (TAT) per case was 5.4 days, which decreased from 6.8 days in 2012 to 5.0 days in 2014. Immunostains were required for most of the cases. For some difficult cases, more than one round of immunostains was needed, which extended the TAT. Among 855 cases (54.7%) where a primary diagnosis or impression was provided by the referring local hospitals in China, the final diagnoses rendered by UPMC pathologists were identical in 25.6% of cases and significantly modified (treatment plan altered) in 50.8% of cases. Conclusion: These results indicate that international telepathology consultation can significantly improve patient care by facilitating access to pathology expertise. The success of this international digital consultation service was dependent on strong commitment and support from leadership, information technology expertise, and dedicated pathologists who understood the language and culture on both sides. Lack of clinical information, missing gross pathology descriptions, and insufficient tissue sections submitted for evaluation were the main reasons for indefinite diagnoses. The overall experience encourages international telepathology practice for second opinions.

[1]  Aleksandar Vodovnik,et al.  Distance reporting in digital pathology: A study on 950 cases , 2015, Journal of pathology informatics.

[2]  Mari Mino-Kenudson,et al.  Whole-slide imaging digital pathology as a platform for teleconsultation: a pilot study using paired subspecialist correlations. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[3]  Chen Zhou,et al.  A nationwide telepathology consultation and quality control program in China: implementation and result analysis , 2014, Diagnostic Pathology.

[4]  A. Demetris,et al.  Development and experience with an integrated system for transplantation telepathology. , 2001, Human pathology.

[5]  Bethesda System reporting rates for conventional Papanicolaou tests and liquid-based cytology in a large Chinese, College of American Pathologists-certified independent medical laboratory: analysis of 1394389 Papanicolaou test reports. , 2015, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[6]  Christopher Naugler,et al.  The history of pathology informatics: A global perspective , 2013, Journal of pathology informatics.

[7]  Jiang Gu,et al.  A feasibility study of virtual slides in surgical pathology in China. , 2007, Human pathology.

[8]  Christopher C. Griffith,et al.  Prior high‐risk HPV testing and Pap test results for 427 invasive cervical cancers in China's largest CAP‐certified laboratory , 2015, Cancer cytopathology.

[9]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  Imaging file management to support international telepathology , 2015, Journal of pathology informatics.

[10]  Mike May,et al.  A better lens on disease. , 2010, Scientific American.

[11]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  Experience with multimodality telepathology at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center , 2012, Journal of pathology informatics.

[12]  Eugene Tseytlin,et al.  Digital Pathology Consultations—a New Era in Digital Imaging, Challenges and Practical Applications , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[13]  Jiang Gu,et al.  Assessment of diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of dynamic telepathology in China. , 2008, Human pathology.

[14]  Ain Aaviksoo,et al.  Telemedicine across borders: A systematic review of factors that hinder or support implementation , 2012, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[15]  R S Weinstein,et al.  Telepathology overview: from concept to implementation. , 2001, Human pathology.

[16]  Renee J. Slaw,et al.  Validating whole-slide imaging for consultation diagnoses in surgical pathology. , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[17]  David C Wilbur,et al.  Interinstitutional whole slide imaging teleconsultation service development: assessment using internal training and clinical consultation cases. , 2015, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[18]  Kurt Brauchli,et al.  The iPath telemedicine platform , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.