Modified human contrast sensitivity function based phase mask for susceptibility-weighted imaging

The aim of the work is to increase the visual information in magnetic resonance imaging based susceptibility weighted images. Our approach is to amplify spatial frequency information of the phase mask used to increase susceptibility weighting using a modified version of the human contrast sensitivity function. Thereby, we propose a modified version of the human contrast sensitivity function for use in phase mask creation. Comparison with conventional susceptibility-weighted imaging was undertaken on a qualitative basis and quantitatively with a number of established image quality metrics on ex vivo mouse brain magnetic resonance images obtained at 16.4 T at various echo times. Four experts also compared the quality of in vivo 1.5 and 3 T human brain magnetic resonance images generated with traditional susceptibility weighted imaging and with the new method. We found that parameters of the modified human contrast sensitivity function can be chosen to improve delineation of structural detail of mouse and human brains. Information contained in susceptibility-weighted images generated using the modified human contrast sensitivity function based phase mask corresponds to that in the conventional method, however the visual range over which it is depicted has improved visual perception. Hence, qualitative evaluation of information contained in susceptibility-weighted images can be improved by amplifying spatial frequencies where human contrast sensitivity is reduced.

[1]  Robert Zivadinov,et al.  Abnormal subcortical deep-gray matter susceptibility-weighted imaging filtered phase measurements in patients with multiple sclerosis A case-control study , 2012, NeuroImage.

[2]  Jozef H Duyn,et al.  Study of brain anatomy with high-field MRI: recent progress. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  Yi Wang,et al.  A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF) , 2011, NMR in biomedicine.

[4]  Viktor Vegh,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility derived from T2 and T 2*‐weighted magnetic resonance magnitude images , 2012 .

[5]  Jeff H. Duyn,et al.  High-field MRI of brain cortical substructure based on signal phase , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Hugues Duffau,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Cerebral Cavernous Malformations With Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging , 2011, Neurosurgery.

[7]  E. Haacke,et al.  Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  Z. Wu,et al.  Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging: Technical Aspects and Clinical Applications, Part 2 , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[9]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) , 2004, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[10]  E. Haacke,et al.  Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging: Technical Aspects and Clinical Applications, Part 1 , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[11]  Yaniv Gal,et al.  Qualitative and Quantitave Analysis of Six Image Fusion Methodologies and Their Application to Medical Imaging , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications.

[12]  E M Haacke,et al.  Artery and vein separation using susceptibility‐dependent phase in contrast‐enhanced MRA , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Michael Kean,et al.  Detecting traumatic brain lesions in children: CT versus MRI versus susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). , 2011, Journal of neurotrauma.

[14]  David J. Sakrison,et al.  The effects of a visual fidelity criterion of the encoding of images , 1974, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[15]  Yongquan Ye,et al.  The role of susceptibility weighted imaging in functional MRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[16]  Gisela E. Hagberg,et al.  Phase stability in fMRI time series: Effect of noise regression, off-resonance correction and spatial filtering techniques , 2012, NeuroImage.

[17]  E. Mark Haacke,et al.  Susceptibility Weighted Imaging and MR Angiography , 2012 .

[18]  George Paxinos,et al.  The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 2001 .

[19]  Andreas Schäfer,et al.  Phase vs. magnitude information in functional magnetic resonance imaging time series: toward understanding the noise. , 2009, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[20]  Rudolf Stollberger,et al.  Automated unwrapping of MR phase images applied to BOLD MR‐venography at 3 Tesla , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  Carlo Ciulla,et al.  Establishing a baseline phase behavior in magnetic resonance imaging to determine normal vs. abnormal iron content in the brain , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  D. H. Kelly Spatial frequency selectivity in the retina , 1975, Vision Research.

[23]  Sandeep Bhuta,et al.  Susceptibility‐Weighted Imaging of the Brain: Current Utility and Potential Applications , 2011, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[24]  Jan Sedlacik,et al.  Susceptibility weighted imaging at ultra high magnetic field strengths: Theoretical considerations and experimental results , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  Scott J. Daly,et al.  Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[26]  T. Benzinger,et al.  Accuracy of Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging for the Detection of Arteriovenous Shunting in Vascular Malformations of the Brain , 2011, Stroke.

[27]  M. Bernas,et al.  Image quality evaluation , 2002, International Symposium on VIPromCom Video/Image Processing and Multimedia Communications.

[28]  Yoojin Lee,et al.  A new susceptibility‐weighted image reconstruction method for the reduction of background phase artifacts , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Jeff H. Duyn,et al.  The contribution of myelin to magnetic susceptibility-weighted contrasts in high-field MRI of the brain , 2012, NeuroImage.

[30]  Avner Meoded,et al.  Evaluation of the ischemic penumbra focusing on the venous drainage: the role of susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) in pediatric ischemic cerebral stroke. , 2014, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[31]  H. K. Nishihara,et al.  CARTOON: A Biologically Motivated Edge Detection Algorithm , 1982 .

[32]  Alessandro Neri,et al.  A Biologically Motivated Multiresolution Approach to Contour Detection , 2007, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..