Benchmarking with data envelopment analysis: a return on asset perspective

Purpose – Selecting appropriate variables for analytical studies is critical for the validity of analysis. It is the same with data envelopment analysis (DEA) studies. In this study, for benchmarking using DEA, the paper seeks to suggest a novel framework based on return on assets (ROA), which is popular and user‐friendly to managers, and demonstrate it by use of an example.Design/methodology/approach – The paper demonstrates the selection of variables using the elements of ROA and applies DEA for measuring and benchmarking the comparative efficiency of companies in the same industry.Findings – It is frequently impossible to obtain internal data for benchmarking from competitors in the same industry. In this case, annual reports may be the only source of data for publicly traded companies. The framework demonstrated with an example is a practical approach for benchmarking with limited data.Research limitations/implications – This study employs financial data and is subject to the limitations of accounting...

[1]  Norman Jackson,et al.  Benchmarking in UK HE: an overview , 2001 .

[2]  Hokey Min,et al.  Benchmarking third‐party logistics providers using data envelopment analysis: an update , 2009 .

[3]  Joseph M. Rosenbeck,et al.  Pharmaceutical companies and sustainability: an analysis of corporate reporting , 2010 .

[4]  Seong-Jong Joo,et al.  Measuring and benchmarking the performance of coffee stores for retail operations , 2009 .

[5]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Using a group support system to aid input–output identification in DEA , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[6]  E H Feroz,et al.  Financial statement analysis: A data envelopment analysis approach , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[7]  Janet M. Wagner,et al.  Stepwise selection of variables in data envelopment analysis: Procedures and managerial perspectives , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  D. Elmuti,et al.  An overview of benchmarking process: a tool for continuous improvement and competitive advantage , 1997 .

[9]  José H. Dulá,et al.  Adding and removing an attribute in a DEA model: theory and processing , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[10]  Hokey Min,et al.  Benchmarking and measuring the comparative efficiency of emergency medical services in major US cities , 2009 .

[11]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[12]  H. Sherman,et al.  Managing Bank Productivity Using Data Envelopment Analysis DEA , 1995 .

[13]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[14]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[15]  He-Boong Kwon,et al.  Measuring comparative efficiencies and merger impacts of wireless communication companies , 2008 .

[16]  Vinh Sum Chau,et al.  Benchmarking service quality in UK electricity distribution networks , 2009 .

[17]  Timothy R. Furey Benchmarking: The key to developing competitive advantage in mature markets , 1987 .

[18]  Breno Nunes,et al.  Green operations initiatives in the automotive industry: an environmental reports analysis and benchmarking study , 2010 .

[19]  Phillip Fanchon,et al.  Variable selection for dynamic measures of efficiency in the computer industry , 2003 .

[20]  Matthew Hinton,et al.  Best practice benchmarking in the UK , 2000 .