Influence of weed maturity levels on species classification using machine vision

Abstract The environmental effect of weed control systems has stimulated research into new practices for weed control, such as selective herbicide application methods on weed-infested crop areas. This research used the color co-occurrence method (CCM) texture analysis to determine the effects of plant maturity on the accuracy of weed species classification of digitized images. Two different experimental combinations of weed species and maturity level were examined. The weed species evaluated were ivyleaf morningglory, giant foxtail, large crabgrass, and velvetleaf, with soil image sets added to each experiment. One study examined classification accuracies for two weed species at three maturity levels, and the second study examined four weed species at two maturity levels. For each species-maturity level combination, 40 digital images were collected from a manually seeded outdoor plant bed. Digitized images were transformed from the red–green–blue (RGB) color format into hue–saturation–intensity (HSI) format to generate CCM texture feature data. Stepwise variable reduction procedures were used to select texture variables with the greatest discriminant capacity. Then discriminant analysis was used to determine the classification accuracy for the two different experiments. When using HSI texture statistics, discriminant analysis correctly classified weed species within and across maturity levels with an accuracy above 97% for both experimental groups. These image processing algorithms demonstrate potential use for weed scouting, weed infestation mapping, and weed control applications using site-specific farming technology. Nomenclature: Ivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. IPOHE; giant foxtail, Setaria faberi Hermm. SETFA; large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. DIGSA; velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medik. ABUTH.

[1]  E. Franz,et al.  Shape description of completely-visible and partially-occluded leaves for identifying plants in digital images. , 2016 .

[2]  E. Franz,et al.  THE USE OF LOCAL SPECTRAL PROPERTIES OF LEAVES AS AN AID FOR IDENTIFYING WEED SEEDLINGS IN DIGITAL IMAGES , 1990 .

[3]  James H. Everitt,et al.  Using Spatial Information Technologies to Map Chinese Tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis) Infestations , 1996, Weed Science.

[4]  M. F. Kocher,et al.  Textural imaging and discriminant analysis for distinguishing weeds for spot spraying , 1998 .

[5]  W D Wright,et al.  Color Science, Concepts and Methods. Quantitative Data and Formulas , 1967 .

[6]  C. W. Lindwall,et al.  Merits of a weed-sensing sprayer to control weeds in conservation fallow and cropping systems , 1998 .

[7]  J. F. Reid,et al.  Texture-Based Weed Classification Using Gabor Wavelets and Neural Network for Real-time Selective Herbicide Applications , 2000 .

[8]  J. V. Stafford,et al.  Potential for automatic weed detection and selective herbicide application , 1991 .

[9]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Combined spectral and spatial processing of ERTS imagery data , 1974 .

[10]  大田 友一,et al.  Knowledge-based interpretation of outdoor natural color scenes , 1985 .

[11]  A. J. Barr,et al.  SAS user's guide , 1979 .

[12]  George E. Meyer,et al.  Shape features for identifying young weeds using image analysis , 1994 .

[13]  N. Z. C. Chaisattapagon,et al.  Effective criteria for weed identification in wheat fields using machine vision , 1995 .

[14]  J. Everitt,et al.  Light Reflectance Characteristics and Remote Sensing of Big Bend Loco (Astragalus mollissimus var. earlei) and Wooton Loco (Astragalus wootonii) , 1994, Weed Science.

[15]  David A. Mortensen,et al.  Economic Importance of Managing Spatially Heterogeneous Weed Populations , 1998, Weed Technology.

[16]  Peter P. Pratt,et al.  Archaeological Survey of the Flint Creek Project for the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service , 1974 .

[17]  Béla Julesz,et al.  Visual Pattern Discrimination , 1962, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[18]  G. Meyer,et al.  Color indices for weed identification under various soil, residue, and lighting conditions , 1994 .

[19]  S. Shearer,et al.  PLANT IDENTIFICATION USING COLOR CO-OCCURRENCE MATRICES , 1990 .

[20]  Alex Martin,et al.  A simulation of herbicide use based on weed spatial distribution , 1995 .