Validity and reliability of a new ankle dorsiflexion measurement device

Background: The assessment of the maximum ankle dorsiflexion angle is an important clinical examination procedure. Evidence shows that the traditional goniometer is highly unreliable, and various designs of goniometers to measure the maximum ankle dorsiflexion angle rely on the application of a known force to obtain reliable results. Hence, an innovative ankle dorsiflexion measurement device was designed to make this measurement more reliable by holding the foot in a selected posture without the application of a known moment. Objectives: To report on the comprehensive validity and reliability testing carried out on the new device. Methods: Following validity testing, four different trials to test reliability of the ankle dorsiflexion measurement device were performed. These trials included inter-rater and intra-rater testings with a controlled moment, intra-rater reliability testing with knees flexed and extended without a controlled moment, intra-rater testing with a patient population, and inter-rater reliability testing between four raters of varying experience without controlling moment. All raters were blinded. Study Design: A series of trials to test intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities. Results: Intra-rater reliability intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.98 and inter-rater reliability intraclass correlation coefficient (2,1) was 0.953 with a controlled moment. With uncontrolled moment, very high reliability for intra-tester was also achieved (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.94 with knees extended and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.95 with knees flexed). For the trial investigating test–retest reliability with actual patients, intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 was obtained. In the trial investigating four different raters with uncontrolled moment, intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.91 was achieved. Conclusions: The new ankle dorsiflexion measurement device is a valid and reliable device for measuring ankle dorsiflexion in both healthy subjects and patients, with both controlled and uncontrolled moments, even by multiple raters of varying experience when the foot is dorsiflexed to its end of range of motion. Clinical relevance An ankle dorsiflexion measuring device has been designed to increase the reliability of ankle dorsiflexion measurement and replace the traditional goniometer. While the majority of similar devices rely on application of a known moment to perform this measurement, it has been shown that this is not required with the new ankle dorsiflexion measurement device and, rather, foot posture should be taken into consideration as this affects the maximum ankle dorsiflexion angle.

[1]  N. Chockalingam,et al.  The effect of uncontrolled moment and short-term, repeated passive stretching on maximum ankle joint dorsiflexion angle. , 2012, Foot.

[2]  A. Moseley,et al.  Normative data for passive ankle plantarflexion--dorsiflexion flexibility. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Mechanical Equinometer to Measure the Range of Motion of the Ankle Joint: Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability , 2006, Foot & ankle international.

[4]  N. Chockalingam,et al.  Clinical assessment of ankle joint dorsiflexion: a review of measurement techniques. , 2011, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[5]  J. M. Rothstein,et al.  Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting. Subtalar and ankle joint measurements. , 1988, Physical therapy.

[6]  P Lundgren,et al.  Invasive in vivo measurement of rear-, mid- and forefoot motion during walking. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[7]  Nachiappan Chockalingam,et al.  Sagittal plane kinematics of the foot during passive ankle dorsiflexion , 2011, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[8]  B. Van Gheluwe,et al.  Reliability and accuracy of biomechanical measurements of the lower extremities. , 2002, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[9]  David G Armstrong,et al.  Reliability and validity of current physical examination techniques of the foot and ankle. , 2008, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[10]  Bruce J Sangeorzan,et al.  Assessment of an electronic goniometer designed to measure equinus contracture. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  Michael J. Mueller,et al.  Passive ankle stiffness in subjects with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy versus an age-matched comparison group. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[12]  R Price,et al.  Design and validation of an instrument package designed to increase the reliability of ankle range of motion measurements. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[13]  H. Yack,et al.  A new device for assessing ankle dorsiflexion motion: reliability and validity. , 2011, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[14]  A. Saxena,et al.  Ankle dorsiflexion in adolescent athletes. , 2003, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[15]  K. Rome,et al.  Ankle joint dorsiflexion measurement studies. A review of the literature. , 1996, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[16]  J. Crisco,et al.  The Reliability of a New Device Designed to Assess Gastrocnemius Contracture , 2002, Foot & ankle international.

[17]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Ankle equinus deformity and its relationship to high plantar pressure in a large population with diabetes mellitus. , 2002, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[18]  S. Scutter,et al.  Measurement of foot dorsiflexion: a modified Lidcombe template. , 2004, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[19]  M. L. Root,et al.  Normal and abnormal function of the foot , 1977 .

[20]  RobRoy L Martin,et al.  Reliability of ankle goniometric measurements: a literature review. , 2005, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[21]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Effect of subtalar joint position on the measurement of maximum ankle dorsiflexic. , 1989, Clinical biomechanics.

[22]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  Can the presence of equinus contracture be established by physical exam alone? , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[23]  P. Kim,et al.  Interrater and intrarater reliability in the measurement of ankle joint dorsiflexion is independent of examiner experience and technique used. , 2011, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.