Promoting pro-environmental behaviour through augmented reality and persuasive informational power: A pilot study

Abstract This pilot study examined the idea that use of a mobile technology can have positive consequences for both individual users and, indirectly, society. The augmented reality (AR) application used here is defined as a persuasive technology because it is intended to modify users’ attitudes or behaviours. The application was designed for personal use although it can generate indirect benefits for users’ communities as well as for users themselves. The application was tested on a small sample in a controlled setting in order to observe how it was used and to evaluate its efficacy as a source of information and tool for persuasion. The results showed that opinions of the AR device were generally positive; moreover, participants admitted that it improved their awareness of environmental issues. The strengths of this research are that it shows how the use of persuasive technologies can have collective benefits and demonstrates their informational power.

[1]  A. Tversky Intransitivity of preferences. , 1969 .

[2]  Michael Elwood Roloff,et al.  Persuasion : new directions in theory and research , 1980 .

[3]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[4]  Marco Lalli,et al.  Urban-related identity: Theory, measurement, and empirical findings , 1992 .

[5]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A Survey of Augmented Reality , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[6]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Captology: the study of computers as persuasive technologies , 1997, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[7]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Separate or equal? Bimodal notions of persuasion and a single-process "unimodel" , 1999 .

[8]  P. Stern New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2000 .

[9]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[10]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Let's get physical: The learning benefits of interacting in digitally augmented physical spaces , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  Explaining the Discrepancy between Intentions and Actions: The Case of Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[12]  M. Conner,et al.  The Theory of Planned Behaviour , 2004 .

[13]  Psicologia degli atteggiamenti e delle opinioni , 2005 .

[14]  Kevin Maréchal Not irrational but habitual: The importance of "behavioural lock-in" in energy consumption , 2010 .

[15]  Social and Cultural Sustainability , 2012 .

[16]  Alan B. Craig Understanding Augmented Reality: Concepts and Applications , 2013 .

[17]  Weiqin Chen,et al.  Historical Oslo on a Handheld Device - A Mobile Augmented Reality Application , 2014, KES.

[18]  T. Jung,et al.  The determinants of recommendations to use augmented reality technologies: the case of a Korean theme park. , 2015 .

[19]  R. Pacheco-Torres,et al.  Towards successful environmental performance of sustainable cities: Intervening sectors. A review , 2016 .

[20]  Chia-Chen Chen,et al.  Animating eco-education: To see, feel, and discover in an augmented reality-based experiential learning environment , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Stefania Fantinelli,et al.  Informational Power and Perceived Collective Benefit Affecting the Users’ Preference for a Mobile Technology: Evidences From a Survey Study , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[22]  L'influenza sociale , 2020 .