Interfacial fluid transport is a key to hydrogel bioadhesion

Significance Bioadhesive hydrogels capable of sticking to living tissues are of utmost interest for better-integrated implants and less invasive surgical techniques. Nevertheless, adhesion is most difficult to achieve and control on the wet surface of internal tissues. This work demonstrates that fluid transport across the tissue−hydrogel interface governs the creation of adhesion. Through ex vivo experiments and a simple model, we capture how the onset of adhesion depends on a competition between draining and wetting of the interface. This coupling between adhesion and interfacial transport provides a potent key to improve the accuracy of adhesion tests and to enhance the bioadhesive performance of hydrogels. We illustrate this potential in vivo by using superabsorbent hydrogel membranes to make strong liver adhesives. Attaching hydrogels to soft internal tissues is a key to the development of a number of biomedical devices. Nevertheless, the wet nature of hydrogels and tissues renders this adhesion most difficult to achieve and control. Here, we show that the transport of fluids across hydrogel−tissue interfaces plays a central role in adhesion. Using ex vivo peeling experiments on porcine liver, we characterized the adhesion between model hydrogel membranes and the liver capsule and parenchyma. By varying the contact time, the tissue hydration, and the swelling ratio of the hydrogel membrane, a transition between two peeling regimes is found: a lubricated regime where a liquid layer wets the interface, yielding low adhesion energies (0.1 J/m2 to 1 J/m2), and an adhesive regime with a solid binding between hydrogel and tissues and higher adhesion energies (1 J/m2 to 10 J/m2). We show that this transition corresponds to a draining of the interface inducing a local dehydration of the tissues, which become intrinsically adhesive. A simple model taking into account the microanatomy of tissues captures the transition for both the liver capsule and parenchyma. In vivo experiments demonstrate that this effect still holds on actively hydrated tissues like the liver capsule and show that adhesion can be strongly enhanced when using superabsorbent hydrogel meshes. These results shed light on the design of predictive bioadhesion tests as well as on the development of improved bioadhesive strategies exploiting interfacial fluid transport.

[1]  D. Mawad,et al.  Adhesive biomaterials for tissue reconstruction , 2008 .

[2]  Ludwik Leibler,et al.  Organ Repair, Hemostasis, and In Vivo Bonding of Medical Devices by Aqueous Solutions of Nanoparticles** , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[3]  R F Fisher,et al.  The water permeability of basement membrane under increasing pressure: evidence for a new theory of permeability , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[4]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Surgical Materials: Current Challenges and Nano-enabled Solutions. , 2014, Nano today.

[5]  Soong Ho Um,et al.  Tissue Adhesive Catechol‐Modified Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel for Effective, Minimally Invasive Cell Therapy , 2015 .

[6]  A. Tsuda,et al.  Structural Heteropolysaccharide Adhesion to the Glycocalyx of Visceral Mesothelium. , 2017, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[7]  E. G. White Some observations on the liver of the pig: the hepatic lobule and liver cell during post-natal growth. , 1939, Journal of anatomy.

[8]  S. Mortazavi,et al.  An investigation into the role of water movement and mucus gel dehydration in mucoadhesion , 1993 .

[9]  J. Smart The basics and underlying mechanisms of mucoadhesion. , 2005, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[10]  A. Khademhosseini,et al.  Hydrogels in Biology and Medicine: From Molecular Principles to Bionanotechnology , 2006 .

[11]  Brett E. Bouma,et al.  A Bio-Inspired Swellable Microneedle Adhesive for Mechanical Interlocking with Tissue , 2013, Nature Communications.

[12]  S. Cochrane,et al.  The permselectivity of glomerular basement membrane can be compromised by glycation or by exposure to low levels of hypochlorite. , 1997, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta.

[13]  Suvranu De,et al.  An efficient soft tissue characterization algorithm from in vivo indentation experiments for medical simulation , 2008, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[14]  J. Sear Anatomy and physiology of the liver , 1992 .

[15]  G. Lin,et al.  Efficacy of BloodSTOP iX, surgicel, and gelfoam in rat models of active bleeding from partial nephrectomy and aortic needle injury. , 2012, Urology.

[16]  K. Kendall Thin-film peeling-the elastic term , 1975 .

[17]  C. Roy,et al.  Self‐Adjustable Adhesion of Polyampholyte Hydrogels , 2015, Advanced materials.

[18]  T Spîrchez,et al.  [Hepatic circulation]. , 1965, Fiziologia normala si patologica.

[19]  G. Urban,et al.  Hydrogels for Biosensors , 2009 .

[20]  D J Mooney,et al.  Tough adhesives for diverse wet surfaces , 2017, Science.

[21]  D. Leckband,et al.  Measurements of attractive forces between proteins and end-grafted poly(ethylene glycol) chains. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  J. Homola,et al.  Surface interactions of oxidized cellulose with fibrin(ogen) and blood platelets , 2003 .

[23]  N. Artzi,et al.  Aldehyde‐Amine Chemistry Enables Modulated Biosealants with Tissue‐Specific Adhesion , 2009, Advanced materials.

[24]  Tae Gwan Park,et al.  Catechol-functionalized chitosan/pluronic hydrogels for tissue adhesives and hemostatic materials. , 2011, Biomacromolecules.

[25]  A. Larsson,et al.  Understanding the adhesion phenomena in carbohydrate-hydrogel-based systems: Water up-take, swelling and elastic detachment. , 2015, Carbohydrate polymers.

[26]  Jian Yang,et al.  Design strategies and applications of tissue bioadhesives. , 2013, Macromolecular bioscience.

[27]  R. Wilson Changes in the coelomic microclimate during carbon dioxide laparoscopy : morphological and functional implications , 2017 .

[28]  Kee D. Kim,et al.  Polyethylene Glycol Hydrogel Spinal Sealant (DuraSeal Spinal Sealant) as an Adjunct to Sutured Dural Repair in the Spine: Results of a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study , 2011, Spine.

[29]  Karthik Nagapudi,et al.  Engineered collagen–PEO nanofibers and fabrics , 2001, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[30]  Nicholas A. Peppas,et al.  A simple equation for description of solute release I. Fickian and non-fickian release from non-swellable devices in the form of slabs, spheres, cylinders or discs , 1987 .

[31]  G. Kenter,et al.  The histophysiology and pathophysiology of the peritoneum. , 2017, Tissue & cell.

[32]  Qin Zhang,et al.  Bioinspired Adhesive Hydrogels Tackified by Nucleobases , 2017 .

[33]  M. Zandomeni,et al.  Peritoneal surface area: measurements of 40 structures covered by peritoneum: correlation between total peritoneal surface area and the surface calculated by formulas , 2009, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[34]  K. Shull Contact mechanics and the adhesion of soft solids , 2002 .

[35]  M. Record,et al.  Chemical Interactions of Polyethylene Glycols (PEGs) and Glycerol with Protein Functional Groups: Applications to Effects of PEG and Glycerol on Protein Processes. , 2015, Biochemistry.

[36]  A. Larsson,et al.  Osmotic-driven mass transport of water: impact on the adhesiveness of hydrophilic polymers. , 2010, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[37]  A. Metters,et al.  Synthetic matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive hydrogels for the conduction of tissue regeneration: Engineering cell-invasion characteristics , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.