The effect of a decision aid on informed decision-making in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a randomised controlled trial

Early in pregnancy women and their partners face the complex decision on whether or not to participate in prenatal testing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Several studies show that the majority of pregnant women currently do not make informed decisions regarding prenatal testing. As the range of prenatal tests is expanding due to the development of new techniques such as non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), autonomous reproductive decision-making is increasingly challenging. In this study, a randomised controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of a web-based multimedia decision aid on decision-making regarding prenatal testing. The decision aid provided both written and audiovisual information on prenatal tests currently available, that is, prenatal screening by first-trimester combined testing, NIPT and invasive diagnostic testing through chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis. Furthermore, it contained values clarification exercises encouraging pregnant women to reflect on the potential harms and benefits of having prenatal tests performed. The use of the decision aid improved informed decision-making regarding prenatal testing. Of pregnant women allocated to the intervention group (n=130) 82.3% made an informed choice compared with 66.4% of women in the control group (n=131), P=0.004. As the vast majority of pregnant women made decisions consistent with their attitudes towards having prenatal testing performed, this improvement in informed decision-making could be attributed mainly to an increase in decision-relevant knowledge. This study shows that the implementation of a web-based multimedia decision aid directly facilitates the ultimate goal of prenatal testing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities, which is enabling informed autonomous reproductive choice.

[1]  W. Dondorp,et al.  Advances in prenatal screening: the ethical dimension , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  S. Metcalfe,et al.  Use of a decision aid for prenatal testing of fetal abnormalities to improve women’s informed decision making: a cluster randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN22532458] , 2008, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[3]  H. Cuckle,et al.  Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review. , 2004, Health technology assessment.

[4]  S. G. Öhman,et al.  Audiovisual information affects informed choice and experience of information in antenatal Down syndrome screening--a randomized controlled trial. , 2012, Patient education and counseling.

[5]  T. Marteau,et al.  The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). , 1992, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[6]  B. Faas,et al.  Women's and healthcare professionals' preferences for prenatal testing: a discrete choice experiment , 2015, Prenatal diagnosis.

[7]  B. Faas.  Prenatal genetic care: debates and considerations of the past, present and future , 2015, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[8]  J Gabbay,et al.  Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. , 2004, Health technology assessment.

[9]  A. O'Connor.  Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale , 1995, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[10]  Aileen Clarke,et al.  Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  D. Timmermans,et al.  Are pregnant women making informed choices about prenatal screening? , 2005, Genetics in Medicine.

[12]  E. Steegers,et al.  Validation of the Dutch Short Form of the State Scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: Considerations for Usage in Screening Outcomes , 2003, Public Health Genomics.

[13]  L. Chitty,et al.  Development and validation of a measure of informed choice for women undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy , 2015, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[14]  H. Cuckle,et al.  Use of videotapes for viewing at home to inform choice in Down syndrome screening: a randomised controlled trial , 2001, Prenatal diagnosis.

[15]  Trudy van der Weijden,et al.  Assessing the Quality of Decision Support Technologies Using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi) , 2009, PloS one.

[16]  I. Varekamp,et al.  The decisional conflict scale: further validation in two samples of Dutch oncology patients. , 2001, Patient education and counseling.

[17]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  The provision of information and informed decision-making on prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a questionnaire- and register-based survey in a non-selected population. , 2012, Patient education and counseling.

[18]  France Légaré,et al.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[19]  C. Ekstrøm,et al.  Informed choice about Down syndrome screening – effect of an eHealth tool: a randomized controlled trial , 2015, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[20]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Informed decision-making in prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: what knowledge is relevant? , 2011, Patient Education and Counseling.

[21]  J. Emery,et al.  Measuring informed choice in population-based reproductive genetic screening: a systematic review , 2014, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[22]  S. Gregorich,et al.  Effect of enhanced information, values clarification, and removal of financial barriers on use of prenatal genetic testing: a randomized clinical trial. , 2014, JAMA.

[23]  M. Essink‐bot,et al.  Ethnic differences in informed decision-making about prenatal screening for Down's syndrome , 2009, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[24]  J E Allanson,et al.  A randomized trial comparing alternative approaches to prenatal diagnosis counseling in advanced maternal age patients , 2005, Clinical genetics.

[25]  T. Marteau,et al.  A measure of informed choice , 2001, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[26]  Mary E. Norton,et al.  Computerized Prenatal Genetic Testing Decision-Assisting Tool: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2009, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  Susan Michie,et al.  The multi-dimensional measure of informed choice: a validation study. , 2002, Patient education and counseling.

[28]  Deb Feldman-Stewart,et al.  Validation of a Decision Regret Scale , 2003, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.