Propagation modeling results for narrow-beam undersea laser communications

Communication links through ocean waters are challenging due to undersea propagation physics. Undersea optical communications at blue or green wavelengths can achieve high data rates (megabit- to gigabit-per-second class links) despite the challenging undersea medium. Absorption and scattering in ocean waters attenuate optical signals and distort the waveform through dense multipath. The exponential propagation loss and the temporal spread due to multipath limit the achievable link distance and data rate. In this paper, we describe the Monte Carlo modeling of the undersea scattering and absorption channel. We model photon signal attenuation levels, spatial photon distributions, time of arrival statistics, and angle of arrival statistics for a variety of lasercom scenarios through both clear and turbid water environments. Modeling results inform the design options for an undersea optical communication system, particularly illustrating the advantages of narrow-beam lasers compared to wide beam methods (e.g. LED sources). The modeled pupil plane and focal plane photon arrival distributions enable beam tracking techniques for robust pointing solutions, even in highly scattering harbor waters. Laser communication with collimated beams maximizes the photon transfer through the scattering medium and enables spatial and temporal filters to minimize waveform distortion and background interference.

[1]  Rüdiger L. Urbanke,et al.  Modern Coding Theory , 2008 .

[2]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  4.8 Gbit/s 16-QAM-OFDM transmission based on compact 450-nm laser for underwater wireless optical communication. , 2015, Optics express.

[3]  Yuhan Dong,et al.  On impulse response modeling for underwater wireless optical MIMO links , 2014, 2014 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC).

[4]  C. Pontbriand,et al.  An integrated, underwater optical /acoustic communications system , 2010, OCEANS'10 IEEE SYDNEY.

[5]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[6]  Masanori Hanawa,et al.  Optical wireless transmission of 405 nm, 1.45 Gbit/s optical IM/DD-OFDM signals through a 4.8 m underwater channel. , 2015, Optics express.

[7]  V. Rigaud,et al.  Monte-Carlo-based channel characterization for underwater optical communication systems , 2013, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[8]  F. Hanson,et al.  High bandwidth underwater optical communication. , 2008, Applied optics.

[9]  Raymond C. Smith,et al.  Measurements of spectral irradiance underwater , 1970 .

[10]  N Farr,et al.  Optical communication system expands CORK seafloor observatory's bandwidth , 2010, OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE.

[11]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[12]  N. Farr,et al.  Diffuse high-bandwidth optical communications , 2008, OCEANS 2008.

[13]  T. J. Petzold Volume Scattering Functions for Selected Ocean Waters , 1972 .

[14]  P. Muthuchidambaranathan,et al.  Characterization of Channel Impulse Responses for NLOS Underwater Wireless Optical Communications , 2014, 2014 Fourth International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communications.

[15]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  2.3 Gbit/s underwater wireless optical communications using directly modulated 520 nm laser diode. , 2015, Optics express.

[16]  K. Stamnes,et al.  Comparison of numerical models for computing underwater light fields. , 1993, Applied optics.

[17]  Bryan S. Robinson,et al.  Overview and results of the Lunar Laser Communication Demonstration , 2014, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[18]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .