Tubular carcinoma of the breast: further evidence to support its excellent prognosis.
暂无分享,去创建一个
I. Ellis | R. Blamey | E. Rakha | A. Evans | D. Macmillan | Z. Hodi | Andrew H. S. Lee | S. Menon | N. Assad
[1] Barbara L. Smith,et al. Tubular carcinoma of the breast: results of a large contemporary series. , 2009, American journal of surgery.
[2] J. Peterse,et al. Refinement of breast cancer classification by molecular characterization of histological special types , 2008, The Journal of pathology.
[3] Ian O Ellis,et al. Prognostic significance of Nottingham histologic grade in invasive breast carcinoma. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[4] G. Turashvili,et al. Are columnar cell lesions the earliest histologically detectable non-obligate precursor of breast cancer? , 2008, Virchows Archiv.
[5] I. Ellis,et al. Morphologic and Molecular Evolutionary Pathways of Low Nuclear Grade Invasive Breast Cancers and Their Putative Precursor Lesions: Further Evidence to Support the Concept of Low Nuclear Grade Breast Neoplasia Family , 2008, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[6] J. Noël,et al. Expression of cathepsin D and galectin 3 in tubular carcinomas of the breast , 2008, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.
[7] R W Blamey,et al. Survival of invasive breast cancer according to the Nottingham Prognostic Index in cases diagnosed in 1990-1999. , 2007, European journal of cancer.
[8] G. Gong,et al. Pure and Mixed Tubular Carcinoma of the Breast: Mammographic and Sonographic Differential Features , 2007, Korean journal of radiology.
[9] A. Oktay,et al. Tubular carcinoma of the breast: Mammographic, sonographic, clinical and pathologic findings , 2007 .
[10] T. Simonart,et al. Microvessel and lymphatic density in tubular carcinoma of the breast: comparative study with invasive low-grade ductal carcinoma. , 2006, Breast.
[11] J. Robertson,et al. Morphological and immunophenotypic analysis of breast carcinomas with basal and myoepithelial differentiation , 2006, The Journal of pathology.
[12] J. Daling,et al. Clinical characteristics of different histologic types of breast cancer , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.
[13] G. Ball,et al. High‐throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well‐characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses , 2005, International journal of cancer.
[14] M. Sherman,et al. Comparison of age-specific incidence rate patterns for different histopathologic types of breast carcinoma. , 2004, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.
[15] C. Axelsson,et al. The Nottingham Prognostic Index applied to 9,149 patients from the studies of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[16] G. Cserni,et al. Tumour histological grade may progress between primary and recurrent invasive mammary carcinoma. , 2002, Journal of Clinical Pathology.
[17] E. Berg,et al. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours , 2002 .
[18] S. Devries,et al. Genomic alterations in tubular breast carcinomas. , 2001, Human pathology.
[19] I. Olivotto,et al. Tubular Carcinoma of the Breast: A Population‐Based Study of Nodal Metastases at Presentation and of Patterns of Relapse , 2001, The breast journal.
[20] R. Gelber,et al. Tubular carcinoma of the breast: Prognosis and response to adjuvant systemic therapy , 2001, ANZ journal of surgery.
[21] J. Lamb,et al. Pathology characteristics that optimize outcome prediction of a breast screening trial , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.
[22] S. Edge,et al. Prognostic factors in breast cancer , 2005 .
[23] H. Stalsberg,et al. The delimitation of tubular carcinomaof the breast , 2000 .
[24] G. Inghirami,et al. Tubular Carcinoma of the Breast: Immunohistochemical and DNA Flow Cytometric Profile , 1999, The breast journal.
[25] I. Ellis,et al. The prognosis of small primary breast cancers. , 1999, European journal of cancer.
[26] G M Clark,et al. Tumor characteristics and clinical outcome of tubular and mucinous breast carcinomas. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[27] A. Hanby,et al. Comparative genomic hybridization of breast tumors stratified by histological grade reveals new insights into the biological progression of breast cancer. , 1999, Cancer research.
[28] S. Helmer,et al. Tubular carcinoma of the breast: an institutional review. , 1997, The American surgeon.
[29] M. Cranor,et al. A comparative study of pure tubular and tubulolobular carcinoma of the breast. , 1997, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[30] S. Singletary,et al. Tubular carcinoma of the breast. Predicting axillary nodal metastases and recurrence. , 1996, Annals of Surgery.
[31] S. Pinder,et al. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. IV: Should you be a typer or a grader? A comparative study of two histological prognostic features in operable breast carcinoma , 1995, Histopathology.
[32] R. Walker,et al. Pathological and biological features of mammographically detected invasive breast carcinomas. , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.
[33] R. Blamey,et al. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. II. Histological type. Relationship with survival in a large study with long‐term follow‐up , 1992, Histopathology.
[34] I. Ellis,et al. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.
[35] S Hellman,et al. Pathological prognostic factors in stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T1N1M0) breast carcinoma: a study of 644 patients with median follow-up of 18 years. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[36] P. Carstens,et al. Tubular carcinoma of the breast. A long term follow‐up , 1985, Histopathology.
[37] F. Parl,et al. The histologic and biologic spectrum of tubular carcinoma of the breast. , 1983, Human pathology.
[38] H. Norris,et al. Well-differentiated (tubular) carcinoma of the breast. A clinicopathologic study of 145 pure and mixed cases. , 1982, American journal of clinical pathology.
[39] D. Gersell,et al. Tubular carcinoma of the breast: Clinical and pathological observations concerning 135 cases , 1982, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[40] G. Peters,et al. Tubular carcinoma of the breast. Clinical pathologic correlations based on 100 cases. , 1981, Annals of surgery.
[41] H. Oberman,et al. Tubular carcinoma of the breast , 1979, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[42] P. Carstens. Tubular carcinoma of the breast. A study of frequency. , 1978, American journal of clinical pathology.
[43] S. Feig,et al. The pathology of breast cancer detected by mass population screening , 1977, Cancer.
[44] P. Rosen,et al. Medullary carcinoma of the breast. A clinicopathologic study with 10 year follow‐up , 1977, Cancer.
[45] H. Salazar,et al. Tubular carcinoma of the breast. Clinical, histological, and ultrastructural observations. , 1977, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[46] A. Huvos,et al. Tubular carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic study of 35 cases. , 1972, American Journal of Clinical Pathology.