Numerical simulation of the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar test technique for concrete under compression

Abstract The Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar [SHPB] technique has been commonly used to investigate concrete compressive response under high strain rate. However, there appears to be a lack of agreement in the literature about a number of critical issues pertaining to this test method. In this paper, computational simulation models are employed to critique the technique and obtain a better understanding of it. Influential parameters are identified and attempts are made to shed light on some controversial issues surrounding the interpretation of high strain rate test data. The results show that significantly different strain rates can be obtained from the same SHPB test depending on the method used to estimate the strain rate value. Furthermore, comparing the results of simulations with pressure-independent and pressure-dependent constitutive material models show that strength increases associated with strain rate are strongly, but not totally, reliant upon the confinement introduced by lateral inertial effects and the frictional condition at the interface between the pressure bars and the specimen. Based on these observations, it is argued that the so-called ‘rate-enhanced’ models that explicitly account for strength increases as a function of strain rate should not be used in numerical simulations that already account for the effects of lateral confinement, since such models would tend to double-count the strain rate effect.

[1]  Joseph W. Tedesco,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Analysis of High Strain Rate Splitting-Tensile Tests , 1993 .

[2]  L. Malvar,et al.  Dynamic Increase Factors for Concrete , 1998 .

[3]  Stavroula J. Pantazopoulou,et al.  Plasticity Model for Concrete under Triaxial Compression , 2001 .

[4]  Wai-Fah Chen.  Plasticity in reinforced concrete , 1982 .

[5]  James G. MacGregor,et al.  Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design , 1996 .

[6]  S H Perry,et al.  Impact Behavior of Plain Concrete Loaded in Uniaxial Compression , 1995 .

[7]  J. Reynouard,et al.  Modeling of structures subjected to impact: concrete behaviour under high strain rate , 2003 .

[8]  Joseph W. Tedesco,et al.  Moisture and Strain Rate Effects on Concrete Strength , 1996 .

[9]  Demetrios M. Cotsovos,et al.  Numerical investigation of RC structural walls subjected to cyclic loading , 2005 .

[10]  I Imran,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF PLAIN CONCRETE UNDER TRIAXIAL STRESS. CLOSURE , 1996 .

[11]  Qingming Li,et al.  About the dynamic strength enhancement of concrete-like materials in a split Hopkinson pressure bar test , 2003 .

[12]  Joseph W. Tedesco,et al.  Split-Hopkinson Pressure-Bar tests on Concrete and Mortar in Tension and Compression , 1989 .

[13]  J. W. Tedesco,et al.  Effects of Strain Rate on Concrete Strength , 1995 .

[14]  Sujeeva Setunge,et al.  Stress versus strain relationship of high strength concrete under high lateral confinement , 1999 .

[15]  Laurent Daudeville,et al.  Numerical Study of Compressive Behavior of Concrete at High Strain Rates , 1999 .

[16]  Kurt H. Gerstle,et al.  Concrete Over the Top--Or, is there Life After Peak? , 1989 .

[17]  G. Plauk.  Concrete structures under impact and impulsive loading , 1982 .

[18]  Min Zhou,et al.  Dynamic behavior of concrete at high strain rates and pressures: I. experimental characterization , 2001 .

[19]  Oana Cazacu,et al.  Behavior of cementitious materials for high-strain rate conditions , 2006 .

[20]  J. R. Klepaczko,et al.  ON A VERY HIGH RATE SENSITIVITY OF CONCRETE FAILURE AT HIGH LOADING RATES AND IMPACT , 2003 .

[21]  Sia Nemat-Nasser,et al.  Strain-rate effect on brittle failure in compression , 1994 .

[22]  Sujeeva Setunge,et al.  Complete Triaxial Stress-Strain Curves of High-Strength Concrete , 2001 .