Luminosity-dependent X-Ray Active Galactic Nucleus Clustering?

We have analyzed the angular clustering of X-ray-selected active galactic nuclei (AGNs) in different flux-limited subsamples of the Chandra Deep Field North (CDF-N) and South (CDF-S) surveys. We find a strong dependence of the clustering strength on the subsample flux limit, a fact that explains most of the disparate clustering results of different XMM and Chandra surveys. Using Limber's equation, we find that the inverted CDF-N and CDF-S spatial clustering lengths are consistent with direct spatial clustering measures found in the literature, while at higher flux limits the clustering length increases considerably; for example, at fx,limit ~ 10−15 ergs s−1 cm−2, we obtain r0 17 ± 5 and 18 ± 3 h−1 Mpc for the CDF-N and CDF-S, respectively. We show that the observed flux limit clustering trend hints toward an X-ray luminosity dependent clustering of X-ray-selected, z ~ 1, AGNs.

[1]  S. Borgani,et al.  The spatial clustering of X-ray selected AGN and galaxies in the Chandra Deep Field South and North , 2004, astro-ph/0409759.

[2]  Takamitsu Miyaji,et al.  The XMM-Newton Wide-Field Survey in the COSMOS Field. V. Angular Clustering of the X-Ray Point Sources , 2006, astro-ph/0612369.

[3]  The ELAIS deep X-ray survey - I. Chandra source catalogue and first results , 2002, astro-ph/0207622.

[4]  S. Borgani,et al.  Tracing the Large-Scale Structure in the Chandra Deep Field South , 2003, astro-ph/0304177.

[5]  P. Norberg,et al.  Luminosity‐ and redshift‐dependent quasar clustering , 2006, astro-ph/0607348.

[6]  D. M. Alexander,et al.  The Fall of AGN and the Rise of Star-Forming Galaxies: A Close Look at the Chandra Deep Field X-ray Number , 2004 .

[7]  D. M. Alexander,et al.  Optical and Infrared Properties of the 2 Ms Chandra Deep Field North X-Ray Sources , 2003, astro-ph/0306212.

[8]  M. Persic,et al.  Constraints on large-scale clustering from the autocorrelation properties of the X-ray background , 1990 .

[9]  I. Georgantopoulos,et al.  The clustering of XMM-Newton hard X-ray sources , 2004 .

[10]  M. J. Page,et al.  Clustering of X-ray selected active galactic nuclei , 1998, astro-ph/9804314.

[11]  Phillip James Edwin Peebles,et al.  Statistical analysis of catalogs of extragalactic objects. I. Theory , 1973 .

[12]  B. Boyle,et al.  The clustering of QSOs at low redshift , 1993 .

[13]  Constraining the Cold Dark Matter Spectrum Normalization in Flat Dark Energy Cosmologies , 2006, astro-ph/0607065.

[14]  Cosmological constraints from X-ray AGN clustering and Type Ia supernova data , 2005, astro-ph/0503272.

[15]  L. Kewley,et al.  The Chandra Deep Field-South: Optical Spectroscopy. I. , 2003, astro-ph/0312324.

[16]  R. Mushotzky,et al.  Spatial Correlation Function of the Chandra-selected Active Galactic Nuclei , 2006, astro-ph/0601634.

[17]  T. Kundić The Quasar-Quasar Correlation Function in the Palomar Transit Grism Survey , 1997 .

[18]  Belinda J. Wilkes,et al.  Chandra Multiwavelength Project X-Ray Point Source Number Counts and the Cosmic X-Ray Background , 2006, astro-ph/0611841.

[19]  W. Forman,et al.  Detection of the Angular Correlation of Faint X-Ray Sources , 1995, astro-ph/9510040.

[20]  D. M. Alexander,et al.  The Extended Chandra Deep Field-South Survey: Chandra Point-Source Catalogs , 2005, astro-ph/0506607.

[21]  P. Ciliegi,et al.  The XMM-Newton survey of the ELAIS-S1 field. I. Number counts, angular correlation function and X-ra , 2006 .

[22]  S. White,et al.  An analytic model for the spatial clustering of dark matter haloes , 1995, astro-ph/9512127.

[23]  P. Peebles Principles of Physical Cosmology , 1993 .

[24]  I. Georgantopoulos,et al.  The XMM-Newton/2dF Survey — VI. Clustering and bias of the soft X-ray point sources , 2004, astro-ph/0409670.

[25]  D. B. Sanders,et al.  Imaging Large-Scale Structure in the X-Ray Sky , 2003 .

[26]  I. Georgantopoulos,et al.  The angular correlation function of the ROSAT All‐Sky Survey Bright Source Catalogue , 2000 .

[27]  A. Fontana,et al.  The K20 survey. VII. The spectroscopic catalogue: spectral properties and evolution of the galaxy population ⋆, ⋆⋆ , 2005, astro-ph/0504248.

[28]  S. Borgani,et al.  First Results from the X-Ray and Optical Survey of the Chandra Deep Field South , 2000, astro-ph/0007240.

[29]  D. M. Alexander,et al.  The Chandra Deep Field North Survey. XIII. 2 Ms Point-Source Catalogs , 2003, astro-ph/0304392.

[30]  G. Hasinger,et al.  Luminosity-dependent evolution of soft X-ray selected AGN : New Chandra and XMM-Newton surveys , 2005, astro-ph/0506118.

[31]  J. P. Huchra,et al.  Spatial Correlation Function of X-Ray-selected Active Galactic Nuclei , 2004, astro-ph/0408304.

[32]  R. Sheth,et al.  Ellipsoidal collapse and an improved model for the number and spatial distribution of dark matter haloes , 1999, astro-ph/9907024.

[33]  P. Ciliegi,et al.  The HELLAS2XMM Survey. VII. The Hard X-Ray Luminosity Function of AGNs up to z = 4: More Absorbed AGNs at Low Luminosities and High Redshifts , 2005, astro-ph/0509081.

[34]  O. Garcet,et al.  The XMM large scale structure survey: properties and two-point angular correlations of point-like sources , 2006 .