Adaptive dualISO HDR reconstruction

With the development of modern image sensors enabling flexible image acquisition, single shot high dynamic range (HDR) imaging is becoming increasingly popular. In this work, we capture single shot HDR images using an imaging sensor with spatially varying gain/ISO. This allows all incoming photons to be used in the imaging. Previous methods on single shot HDR capture use spatially varying neutral density (ND) filters which lead to wasting incoming light. The main technical contribution in this work is an extension of previous HDR reconstruction approaches for single shot HDR imaging based on local polynomial approximations (Kronander et al., Unified HDR reconstruction from raw CFA data, 2013; Hajisharif et al., HDR reconstruction for alternating gain (ISO) sensor readout, 2014). Using a sensor noise model, these works deploy a statistically informed filtering operation to reconstruct HDR pixel values. However, instead of using a fixed filter size, we introduce two novel algorithms for adaptive filter kernel selection. Unlike a previous work, using adaptive filter kernels (Signal Process Image Commun 29(2):203–215, 2014), our algorithms are based on analyzing the model fit and the expected statistical deviation of the estimate based on the sensor noise model. Using an iterative procedure, we can then adapt the filter kernel according to the image structure and the statistical image noise. Experimental results show that the proposed filter de-noises the noisy image carefully while well preserving the important image features such as edges and corners, outperforming previous methods. To demonstrate the robustness of our approach, we have exploited input images from raw sensor data using a commercial off-the-shelf camera. To further analyze our algorithm, we have also implemented a camera simulator to evaluate different gain patterns and noise properties of the sensor.

[1]  Jaakko Astola,et al.  Local Approximation Techniques in Signal and Image Processing (SPIE Press Monograph Vol. PM157) , 2006 .

[2]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Radiometric self calibration , 1999, Proceedings. 1999 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No PR00149).

[3]  Erik Reinhard,et al.  09 – Image-based Lighting , 2006 .

[4]  Jonas Unger,et al.  HDR Reconstruction for Alternating Gain (ISO) Sensor Readout , 2014, Eurographics.

[5]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Kernel Regression for Image Processing and Reconstruction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs , 1997, SIGGRAPH '08.

[7]  Hans Jørgen Andersen,et al.  Noise Characterization of Weighting Schemes for Combination of Multiple Exposures , 2006, BMVC.

[8]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  High dynamic range video , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..

[9]  M. Wand Local Regression and Likelihood , 2001 .

[10]  Erik Reinhard,et al.  High Dynamic Range Imaging: Acquisition, Display, and Image-Based Lighting , 2010 .

[11]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  High dynamic range imaging: spatially varying pixel exposures , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[12]  Harald Brendel,et al.  Creating cinematic wide gamut HDR-video for the evaluation of tone mapping operators and HDR-displays , 2014, Electronic Imaging.

[13]  Ljubisa Stankovic,et al.  Performance analysis of the adaptive algorithm for bias-to-variance tradeoff , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[14]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  Optimal HDR reconstruction with linear digital cameras , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[15]  Kari Pulli,et al.  FlexISP , 2014, ACM Trans. Graph..

[16]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  A reconfigurable camera add-on for high dynamic range, multispectral, polarization, and light-field imaging , 2013, ACM Trans. Graph..

[17]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Normalized and differential convolution , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[18]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Local Likelihood Estimation , 1987 .

[19]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Enhancing resolution along multiple imaging dimensions using assorted pixels , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[20]  Roberto Manduchi,et al.  Bilateral filtering for gray and color images , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[21]  P. Lancaster,et al.  Surfaces generated by moving least squares methods , 1981 .

[22]  Stefan Gustavson,et al.  High-dynamic-range video for photometric measurement of illumination , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[23]  Erik Reinhard,et al.  Noise reduction in high dynamic range imaging , 2007, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[24]  Narendra Ahuja,et al.  Split Aperture Imaging for High Dynamic Range , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[25]  André Kaup,et al.  High dynamic range video by spatially non-regular optical filtering , 2012, 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[26]  Aykut Erdem,et al.  The State of the Art in HDR Deghosting: A Survey and Evaluation , 2015, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[27]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  A Tour of Modern Image Filtering: New Insights and Methods, Both Practical and Theoretical , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[28]  Julie Delon,et al.  Single shot high dynamic range imaging using piecewise linear estimators , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP).

[29]  Pradeep Sen,et al.  A versatile HDR video production system , 2011, ACM Trans. Graph..

[30]  Stefan Gustavson,et al.  Unified HDR reconstruction from raw CFA data , 2013, IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP).

[31]  Mark Ollila,et al.  A Real Time Light Probe , 2004, Eurographics.

[32]  Anders Ynnerman,et al.  A unified framework for multi-sensor HDR video reconstruction , 2013, Signal Process. Image Commun..