The robustness of equilibria on convex solids

We examine the minimal magnitude of perturbations necessary to change the number $N$ of static equilibrium points of a convex solid $K$. We call the normalized volume of the minimally necessary truncation robustness and we seek shapes with maximal robustness for fixed values of $N$. While the upward robustness (referring to the increase of $N$) of smooth, homogeneous convex solids is known to be zero, little is known about their downward robustness. The difficulty of the latter problem is related to the coupling (via integrals) between the geometry of the hull $\bd K$ and the location of the center of gravity $G$. Here we first investigate two simpler, decoupled problems by examining truncations of $\bd K$ with $G$ fixed, and displacements of $G$ with $\bd K$ fixed, leading to the concept of external \rm and internal \rm robustness, respectively. In dimension 2, we find that for any fixed number $N=2S$, the convex solids with both maximal external and maximal internal robustness are regular $S$-gons. Based on this result we conjecture that regular polygons have maximal downward robustness also in the original, coupled problem. We also show that in the decoupled problems, 3-dimensional regular polyhedra have maximal internal robustness, however, only under additional constraints. Finally, we prove results for the full problem in case of 3 dimensional solids. These results appear to explain why monostatic pebbles (with either one stable, or one unstable point of equilibrium) are found so rarely in Nature.

[1]  Péter L. Várkonyi,et al.  Static Equilibria of Rigid Bodies: Dice, Pebbles, and the Poincare-Hopf Theorem , 2006, J. Nonlinear Sci..

[2]  Andy Ruina,et al.  Static equilibria of planar, rigid bodies: is there anything new? , 1994 .

[3]  R. Guy,et al.  Stability of Polyhedra , 1966 .

[4]  R. Dawson,et al.  Monostatic Simplexes III , 2001 .

[5]  Zsolt Lángi,et al.  On the equilibria of finely discretized curves and surfaces , 2011, 1106.0626.

[6]  Robert John Strutt,et al.  The ultimate shape of pebbles, natural and artificial , 1942, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[7]  V. W. Noonburg,et al.  Ordinary Differential Equations , 2014 .

[8]  S Redner,et al.  Smoothing a rock by chipping. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  T. Banchoff,et al.  Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces , 2010 .

[10]  G. Domokos,et al.  Geometry and self-righting of turtles , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  F. Bloore,et al.  The shape of pebbles , 1977 .

[12]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Generalized Poincaré-Hopf Theorem for Compact Nonsmooth Regions , 2007, Math. Oper. Res..

[13]  P. D. Krynine ON THE ANTIQUITY OF “SEDIMENTATION” AND HYDROLOGY (WITH SOME MORAL CONCLUSIONS) , 1960 .

[14]  William J. Firey,et al.  Shapes of worn stones , 1974 .

[15]  G. Domokos,et al.  Countinuous and discrete models for abrasion processes , 2009 .

[16]  Robert J. MacG. Dawson,et al.  What Shape is a Loaded Die? , 1999 .

[17]  Péter L. Várkonyi,et al.  Pebbles, Shapes, and Equilibria , 2009 .

[18]  G. Domokos,et al.  The evolution of pebble size and shape in space and time , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[19]  P. Tammes On the origin of number and arrangement of the places of exit on the surface of pollen-grains , 1930 .

[20]  A. Heppes A Double Tipping Tetrahedron , 1966 .

[21]  L. Santaló Integral geometry and geometric probability , 1976 .