Psychosocial Work Characteristics as Risk Factors for Being Injured in an Occupational Accident

Learning ObjectivesIdentify demographic variables that influence the risk of being injured in an occupational accident in this prospective cohort study.Enumerate the risk factors that might be confounding variables when associating the risk of injury with psychosocial features at work.Specify those psychosocial work characteristics that correlated with the risk of occupational accidental injury after adjusting for possible confounding factors.State the implications of these findings for making changes at the work site. Abstract The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between psychosocial work characteristics and the risk for being injured in an occupational accident. We performed this study within the framework of the Maastricht Cohort Study of Fatigue at Work, a prospective cohort study on employees (n = 7051) from a wide range of companies and organizations. One hundred eight workers reported being injured in an occupational accident for which the subject consulted a physician or physiotherapist. Adjustments were made for work environment and demographic variables. High psychologic job demands were a risk factor for being injured in an occupational accident. Low decision latitude had a crude relative risk for being injured in an occupational accident of 2.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.23–3.39). This relationship almost completely disappeared after adjustment for the confounders mentioned here. Coworker and supervisor support were inversely related to the risk of being injured in an occupational accident but did not reach statistical significance. Other psychosocial work characteristics that had a significant effect on the risk for being injured in an occupational accident were conflicts with the supervisor (relative risk [RR] = 2.49; 95% CI = 1.42–4.37) or colleagues (RR = 2.62; 95% CI = 1.58–4.35), job satisfaction (RR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.08–1.91), and high emotional demands (RR = 2.45; 95% CI = 1.52–3.94). We conclude that after adjustment for demographic variables, fatigue, and factors that describe the type of work environment that high psychologic job demands, emotional demands, and conflicts with the supervisor and/or colleagues are risk factors for being injured in an occupational accident.

[1]  I. Kant,et al.  Fatigue as a risk factor for being injured in an occupational accident: results from the Maastricht Cohort Study , 2003, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[2]  C. Cooper,et al.  Individual differences in working hours, work perceptions and accident rates in veterinary surgeries , 2000 .

[3]  I. Kant,et al.  An epidemiological approach to study fatigue in the working population: the Maastricht Cohort Study , 2003, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[4]  Marcus Johannes Petrus Maria van Veldhoven,et al.  Psychosociale arbeidsbelasting en werkstress , 1996 .

[5]  I. Kant,et al.  Fatigue among working people: validity of a questionnaire measure , 2000, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[6]  L Laflamme,et al.  The age-related risk of occupational accidents: the case of Swedish iron-ore miners. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  J. J. Johnston Occupational Injury and Stress , 1995, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[8]  E Kristal-Boneh,et al.  Adverse work and environmental conditions predict occupational injuries. The Israeli Cardiovascular Occupational Risk Factors Determination in Israel (CORDIS) Study. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  Pranab Kumar Nag,et al.  Work accidents among shiftworkers in industry , 1998 .

[10]  F. Zitman,et al.  Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of fluoxetine in chronic fatigue syndrome , 1996, The Lancet.

[11]  I. Kant,et al.  Psychosocial work characteristics as risk factors for the onset of fatigue and psychological distress: prospective results from the Maastricht Cohort Study , 2002, Psychological Medicine.

[12]  N. Kawakami,et al.  The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. , 1998, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[13]  T K Courtney,et al.  Advancing epidemiologic studies of occupational injury--approaches and future directions. , 1997, American journal of industrial medicine.

[14]  Ewa Menckel,et al.  Aging and occupational accidents a review of the literature of the last three decades , 1995 .

[15]  T. Bender,et al.  Epidemiologic research on the etiology of injuries at work. , 1994, Annual review of public health.