暂无分享,去创建一个
Thayer Alshaabi | Peter Sheridan Dodds | Christopher M. Danforth | Andrew J. Reagan | Joshua R. Minot | Michael V. Arnold | D. R. Dewhurst | A. J. Reagan | David R. Dewhurst | Jane L. Adams | C. Danforth | P. Dodds | T. Alshaabi | J. L. Adams | J. Minot | M. V. Arnold
[1] D. R. Dewhurst,et al. Fame and Ultrafame: Measuring and comparing daily levels of 'being talked about' for United States' presidents, their rivals, God, countries, and K-pop , 2019, Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media.
[2] Matteo Iacoviello,et al. Measuring Geopolitical Risk , 2018, International Finance Discussion Papers.
[3] Thayer Alshaabi,et al. The growing amplification of social media: measuring temporal and social contagion dynamics for over 150 languages on Twitter for 2009–2020 , 2021, EPJ Data Sci..
[4] A. J. Reagan,et al. Computational timeline reconstruction of the stories surrounding Trump: Story turbulence, narrative control, and collective chronopathy , 2020, PloS one.
[5] C. M. Danforth,et al. How the world’s collective attention is being paid to a pandemic: COVID-19 related n-gram time series for 24 languages on Twitter , 2020, PloS one.
[6] Jürgen Pfeffer,et al. Population Bias in Geotagged Tweets , 2015, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
[7] Nancy C. Wallis. Book Review: Learning to Speak God from Scratch: Why Sacred Words Are Vanishing—and how We Can Revive Them , 2020 .
[8] P. S. Dodds,et al. Long-term word frequency dynamics derived from Twitter are corrupted: A bespoke approach to detecting and removing pathologies in ensembles of time series , 2020, ArXiv.
[9] Daniel Y. Fu,et al. Analyzing Who and What Appears in a Decade of US Cable TV News , 2020, ArXiv.
[10] Dan Jurafsky,et al. Racial disparities in automated speech recognition , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[11] C. M. Danforth,et al. Allotaxonometry and rank-turbulence divergence: A universal instrument for comparing complex systems. , 2020, 2002.09770.
[12] Duncan Watts,et al. Evaluating the fake news problem at the scale of the information ecosystem , 2019, Science Advances.
[13] Thayer Alshaabi,et al. The shocklet transform: a decomposition method for the identification of local, mechanism-driven dynamics in sociotechnical time series , 2019, EPJ Data Science.
[14] Martin Gerlach,et al. A Standardized Project Gutenberg Corpus for Statistical Analysis of Natural Language and Quantitative Linguistics , 2018, Entropy.
[15] Damon McCoy,et al. SMAT: The Social Media Analysis Toolkit , 2020, ICWSM Workshops.
[16] Deb Roy,et al. RadioTalk: a large-scale corpus of talk radio transcripts , 2019, INTERSPEECH.
[17] Gábor Vattay,et al. Scaling in words on Twitter , 2019, Royal Society Open Science.
[18] Fred Morstatter,et al. Tampering with Twitter’s Sample API , 2018, EPJ Data Science.
[19] Quan-Hoang Vuong,et al. Healthcare consumers’ sensitivity to costs: a reflection on behavioural economics from an emerging market , 2018, Palgrave Communications.
[20] Aixin Sun,et al. A Survey of Location Prediction on Twitter , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.
[21] Jonathan Mellon,et al. Twitter and Facebook are not representative of the general population: Political attitudes and demographics of British social media users , 2017 .
[22] F. Arnaud,et al. From core referencing to data re-use: two French national initiatives to reinforce paleodata stewardship (National Cyber Core Repository and LTER France Retro-Observatory) , 2017 .
[23] Qing Ke,et al. A systematic identification and analysis of scientists on Twitter , 2016, PloS one.
[24] Tomas Mikolov,et al. Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Information , 2016, TACL.
[25] Tomas Mikolov,et al. Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classification , 2016, EACL.
[26] Alexander Koplenig,et al. The impact of lacking metadata for the measurement of cultural and linguistic change using the Google Ngram data sets - Reconstructing the composition of the German corpus in times of WWII , 2015, Digit. Scholarsh. Humanit..
[27] Christopher M. Danforth,et al. Is language evolution grinding to a halt? The scaling of lexical turbulence in English fiction suggests it is not , 2015, J. Comput. Sci..
[28] Brendan T. O'Connor,et al. Demographic Dialectal Variation in Social Media: A Case Study of African-American English , 2016, EMNLP.
[29] C. Peirce. Prolegomena to an Apology for Pragmaticism , 2016 .
[30] Desmond Elliott,et al. A Corpus of Images and Text in Online News , 2016, LREC.
[31] Shahar Ronen,et al. Pantheon 1.0, a manually verified dataset of globally famous biographies , 2015, Scientific Data.
[32] F. Maxwell Harper,et al. The MovieLens Datasets: History and Context , 2016, TIIS.
[33] 悠太 菊池,et al. 大規模要約資源としてのNew York Times Annotated Corpus , 2015 .
[34] Alessandro Vespignani,et al. Online social networks and offline protest , 2015, EPJ Data Science.
[35] Yoram Bachrach,et al. Studying User Income through Language, Behaviour and Affect in Social Media , 2015, PloS one.
[36] Christopher M. Danforth,et al. Characterizing the Google Books Corpus: Strong Limits to Inferences of Socio-Cultural and Linguistic Evolution , 2015, PloS one.
[37] James P. Bagrow,et al. Zipf’s law holds for phrases, not words , 2014, Scientific Reports.
[38] Shari Laster,et al. The American Presidency Project , 2014 .
[39] S. Piantadosi. Zipf’s word frequency law in natural language: A critical review and future directions , 2014, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[40] Andrew Gelman,et al. The No-U-turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[41] E. Chenoweth,et al. Drop Your Weapons When and Why Civil Resistance Works , 2014 .
[42] Timothy R. Tangherlini,et al. Trawling in the Sea of the Great Unread: Sub-corpus topic modeling and Humanities research , 2013 .
[43] Derek Ruths,et al. Classifying Political Orientation on Twitter: It's Not Easy! , 2013, ICWSM.
[44] D. Ruths,et al. What's in a Name? Using First Names as Features for Gender Inference in Twitter , 2013, AAAI Spring Symposium: Analyzing Microtext.
[45] James Abello,et al. Computational folkloristics , 2012, Commun. ACM.
[46] L. Armytage. History and context , 2012 .
[47] Muhammad Atif Qureshi,et al. What Do the Average Twitterers Say: A Twitter Model for Public Opinion Analysis in the Face of Major Political Events , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.
[48] Soon Ae Chun,et al. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times , 2011 .
[49] Sounman Hong,et al. Does the early bird move the polls?: the use of the social media tool 'Twitter' by U.S. politicians and its impact on public opinion , 2011, dg.o '11.
[50] Huiji Gao,et al. Harnessing the Crowdsourcing Power of Social Media for Disaster Relief , 2011, IEEE Intelligent Systems.
[51] Heather Christenson. Hathitrust: A research library at web Scale , 2011 .
[52] Erez Lieberman Aiden,et al. Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books , 2010, Science.
[53] Alex Pentland,et al. Time-Critical Social Mobilization , 2010, Science.
[54] J. Bohannon. Digital data. Google opens books to new cultural studies. , 2010, Science.
[55] Jure Leskovec,et al. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics , 2010, KDD 2010.
[56] Aron Culotta,et al. Towards detecting influenza epidemics by analyzing Twitter messages , 2010, SOMA '10.
[57] Nello Cristianini,et al. Tracking the flu pandemic by monitoring the social web , 2010, 2010 2nd International Workshop on Cognitive Information Processing.
[58] Yutaka Matsuo,et al. Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors , 2010, WWW '10.
[59] R. Primack,et al. The impact of climate change on cherry trees and other species in Japan , 2009 .
[60] R. Primack,et al. Conservation and management of biodiversity in Japan: An introduction , 2009 .
[61] H. Varian,et al. Predicting the Present with Google Trends , 2009 .
[62] Barbara S. Dunham. Library Resources & : " '-. Technical Service · s , 2008 .
[63] Steven Bird,et al. NLTK: The Natural Language Toolkit , 2002, ACL.
[64] Wallace Koehler,et al. Information science as "Little Science":The implications of a bibliometric analysis of theJournal of the American Society for Information Science , 2001, Scientometrics.
[65] Chris Brew,et al. Proceedings of the ACL-02 Workshop on Effective tools and methodologies for teaching natural language processing and computational linguistics - Volume 1 , 2002 .
[66] David M. W. Powers,et al. Applications and Explanations of Zipf’s Law , 1998, CoNLL.
[67] J. Leiza,et al. A Critical Review and Future Directions , 1997 .
[68] D. Rubin,et al. Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .
[69] A. Kellerman,et al. The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .
[70] Derek de Solla Price,et al. A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes , 1976, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[71] B. M. Hill,et al. A Simple General Approach to Inference About the Tail of a Distribution , 1975 .
[72] 中村 宏. Santa Barbara移植会議(見聞記) , 1967 .
[73] H. Simon,et al. ON A CLASS OF SKEW DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS , 1955 .
[74] George Kingsley Zipf,et al. Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .
[75] The Monist , 1901 .