Phase space sampling and inference from weighted events with autoregressive flows
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Aaron C. Courville,et al. Generative Adversarial Networks , 2022, 2023 14th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT).
[2] K. Hamilton,et al. Colour and logarithmic accuracy in final-state parton showers , 2020, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[3] D. Soper,et al. Summations of large logarithms by parton showers , 2020, Physical Review D.
[4] D. Soper,et al. Summations by parton showers of large logarithms in electron-positron annihilation , 2020, 2011.04777.
[5] K. Cranmer,et al. Simulation-Based Inference Methods for Particle Physics , 2020, Artificial Intelligence for High Energy Physics.
[6] Matthew D. Klimek,et al. Improved neural network Monte Carlo simulation , 2020, 2009.07819.
[7] Kosei Dohi,et al. Variational Autoencoders for Jet Simulation , 2020, 2009.04842.
[8] B. Nachman,et al. Neural resampler for Monte Carlo reweighting with preserved uncertainties , 2020, Physical Review D.
[9] S. Plätzer,et al. Resummation and Simulation of Soft Gluon Effects beyond Leading Color. , 2020, Physical review letters.
[10] Ullrich Kothe,et al. Invertible networks or partons to detector and back again , 2020, 2006.06685.
[11] Sebastian Pina-Otey,et al. Exhaustive Neural Importance Sampling applied to Monte Carlo event generation , 2020, Physical Review D.
[12] S. Prestel,et al. A Positive Resampler for Monte Carlo events with negative weights , 2020, The European Physical Journal C.
[13] G. Kasieczka,et al. Getting High: High Fidelity Simulation of High Granularity Calorimeters with High Speed , 2020, Computing and Software for Big Science.
[14] Marcus A. Brubaker,et al. Normalizing Flows: An Introduction and Review of Current Methods , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
[15] Z. Marshall,et al. Challenges in Monte Carlo Event Generator Software for High-Luminosity LHC , 2020, Computing and Software for Big Science.
[16] S. Plätzer,et al. Building a consistent parton shower , 2020, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[17] R. Frederix,et al. On the reduction of negative weights in MC@NLO-type matching procedures , 2020, 2002.12716.
[18] S. Carrazza,et al. VegasFlow: Accelerating Monte Carlo simulation across multiple hardware platforms , 2020, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[19] Frédéric A. Dreyer,et al. Parton Showers beyond Leading Logarithmic Accuracy. , 2020, Physical review letters.
[20] S. Badger,et al. Using neural networks for efficient evaluation of high multiplicity scattering amplitudes , 2020, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[21] K. Matchev,et al. Uncertainties associated with GAN-generated datasets in high energy physics , 2020, SciPost Physics.
[22] H. Schulz,et al. Event generation with normalizing flows , 2020, Physical Review D.
[23] S. Schumann,et al. Exploring phase space with Neural Importance Sampling , 2020, SciPost Physics.
[24] Christina Gao,et al. i- flow: High-dimensional integration and sampling with normalizing flows , 2020, Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol..
[25] F. Bishara,et al. Machine learning amplitudes for faster event generation , 2019, Physical Review D.
[26] A. Butter,et al. How to GAN event subtraction , 2019, SciPost Physics Core.
[27] Eric Nalisnick,et al. Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inference , 2019, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[28] Maurizio Pierini,et al. Particle Generative Adversarial Networks for full-event simulation at the LHC and their application to pileup description , 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
[29] Natalia Gimelshein,et al. PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library , 2019, NeurIPS.
[30] G. Kasieczka,et al. How to GAN away Detector Effects , 2019, SciPost Physics.
[31] J. Maalmi,et al. Fast simulation of muons produced at the SHiP experiment using Generative Adversarial Networks , 2019 .
[32] T. Neumann,et al. Precision phenomenology with MCFM , 2019, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[33] S. Carrazza,et al. Lund jet images from generative and cycle-consistent adversarial networks , 2019, The European Physical Journal C.
[34] Andy Buckley. Computational challenges for MC event generation , 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
[35] Antoine Wehenkel,et al. Unconstrained Monotonic Neural Networks , 2019, BNAIC/BENELEARN.
[36] Yaoliang Yu,et al. Tails of Lipschitz Triangular Flows , 2019, ICML.
[37] Tilman Plehn,et al. How to GAN LHC events , 2019, SciPost Physics.
[38] Sofia Vallecorsa,et al. 3D convolutional GAN for fast simulation , 2019, EPJ Web of Conferences.
[39] W. Bhimji,et al. Next Generation Generative Neural Networks for HEP , 2019, EPJ Web of Conferences.
[40] Iain Murray,et al. Neural Spline Flows , 2019, NeurIPS.
[41] Iain Murray,et al. Cubic-Spline Flows , 2019, ICML 2019.
[42] H. Schulz,et al. Simulation of vector boson plus many jet final states at the high luminosity LHC , 2019, Physical Review D.
[43] Yaoliang Yu,et al. Sum-of-Squares Polynomial Flow , 2019, ICML.
[44] Nikita Kazeev,et al. Cherenkov Detectors Fast Simulation Using Neural Networks , 2019, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment.
[45] Sana Ketabchi Haghighat,et al. DijetGAN: a Generative-Adversarial Network approach for the simulation of QCD dijet events at the LHC , 2019, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[46] Benjamin Nachman,et al. Machine learning templates for QCD factorization in the search for physics beyond the standard model , 2019, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[47] D. Soper,et al. Parton showers with more exact color evolution , 2019, Physical Review D.
[48] Damian Podareanu,et al. Event generation and statistical sampling for physics with deep generative models and a density information buffer , 2019, Nature Communications.
[49] Saúl Alonso-Monsalve,et al. Image-Based Model Parameter Optimization Using Model-Assisted Generative Adversarial Networks , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.
[50] L. Pang,et al. Regressive and generative neural networks for scalar field theory , 2018, Physical Review D.
[51] Matthew D. Klimek,et al. Neural network-based approach to phase space integration , 2018, SciPost Physics.
[52] Sven Krippendorf,et al. GANs for generating EFT models , 2018, Physics Letters B.
[53] S. Vallecorsa,et al. Generative models for fast simulation , 2018, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
[54] P. Mendez Lorenzo,et al. Three dimensional Generative Adversarial Networks for fast simulation , 2018, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
[55] Thomas Müller,et al. Neural Importance Sampling , 2018, ACM Trans. Graph..
[56] S. Plätzer,et al. Color matrix element corrections for parton showers , 2018, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[57] J. Monk,et al. Deep learning as a parton shower , 2018, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[58] Prafulla Dhariwal,et al. Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutions , 2018, NeurIPS.
[59] Martin Erdmann,et al. Precise Simulation of Electromagnetic Calorimeter Showers Using a Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network , 2018, Computing and Software for Big Science.
[60] T. Trzciński,et al. Generative Models for Fast Cluster Simulations in the TPC for the ALICE Experiment , 2018, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing.
[61] Deepak Kar,et al. Unfolding with Generative Adversarial Networks , 2018, 1806.00433.
[62] Iain Murray,et al. Sequential Neural Likelihood: Fast Likelihood-free Inference with Autoregressive Flows , 2018, AISTATS.
[63] S. Hoche,et al. Leading-color fully differential two-loop soft corrections to QCD dipole showers , 2018, Physical Review D.
[64] Francesco Pandolfi,et al. Fast and Accurate Simulation of Particle Detectors Using Generative Adversarial Networks , 2018, Computing and Software for Big Science.
[65] Alexandre Lacoste,et al. Neural Autoregressive Flows , 2018, ICML.
[66] Martin Erdmann,et al. Generating and Refining Particle Detector Simulations Using the Wasserstein Distance in Adversarial Networks , 2018, Computing and Software for Big Science.
[67] Michela Paganini,et al. CaloGAN: Simulating 3D High Energy Particle Showers in Multi-Layer Electromagnetic Calorimeters with Generative Adversarial Networks , 2017, ArXiv.
[68] Michela Paganini,et al. Controlling Physical Attributes in GAN-Accelerated Simulation of Electromagnetic Calorimeters , 2017, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
[69] Joshua Bendavid,et al. Efficient Monte Carlo Integration Using Boosted Decision Trees and Generative Deep Neural Networks , 2017, 1707.00028.
[70] Iain Murray,et al. Masked Autoregressive Flow for Density Estimation , 2017, NIPS.
[71] Benjamin Nachman,et al. Accelerating Science with Generative Adversarial Networks: An Application to 3D Particle Showers in Multilayer Calorimeters. , 2017, Physical review letters.
[72] F. Krauss,et al. Implementing NLO DGLAP evolution in parton showers , 2017, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[73] S. Hoche,et al. Triple collinear emissions in parton showers , 2017, 1705.00742.
[74] Luke de Oliveira,et al. Learning Particle Physics by Example: Location-Aware Generative Adversarial Networks for Physics Synthesis , 2017, Computing and Software for Big Science.
[75] Max Welling,et al. Improved Variational Inference with Inverse Autoregressive Flow , 2016, NIPS 2016.
[76] Wojciech Zaremba,et al. Improved Techniques for Training GANs , 2016, NIPS.
[77] Samy Bengio,et al. Density estimation using Real NVP , 2016, ICLR.
[78] Luca Martino,et al. Effective sample size for importance sampling based on discrepancy measures , 2016, Signal Process..
[79] Shakir Mohamed,et al. Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows , 2015, ICML.
[80] Hugo Larochelle,et al. MADE: Masked Autoencoder for Distribution Estimation , 2015, ICML.
[81] Jimmy Ba,et al. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.
[82] Yoshua Bengio,et al. NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimation , 2014, ICLR.
[83] Peter Skands,et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 , 2014, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[84] R. Frederix,et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations , 2014, 1405.0301.
[85] Tiziano Peraro,et al. Ninja: Automated integrand reduction via Laurent expansion for one-loop amplitudes , 2014, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[86] Max Welling,et al. Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes , 2013, ICLR.
[87] K. Hagiwara,et al. Fast computation of MadGraph amplitudes on graphics processing unit (GPU) , 2013, The European Physical Journal C.
[88] R. Frederix,et al. Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations , 2012, 1212.3460.
[89] R. Frederix,et al. Merging meets matching in MC@NLO , 2012, 1209.6215.
[90] F. Siegert,et al. QCD matrix elements + parton showers. The NLO case , 2012, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[91] S. Forte,et al. Parton distributions with LHC data , 2012, 1207.1303.
[92] P. Mastrolia,et al. Integrand reduction of one-loop scattering amplitudes through Laurent series expansion , 2012, 1203.0291.
[93] M. Cacciari,et al. FastJet user manual , 2011, 1111.6097.
[94] Rikkert Frederix,et al. Automation of one-loop QCD computations , 2011, 1103.0621.
[95] E. Nurse,et al. General-purpose event generators for LHC physics , 2011, 1101.2599.
[96] Andreas van Hameren,et al. OneLOop: For the evaluation of one-loop scalar functions , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[97] R. Pittau,et al. Automated one-loop calculations: a proof of concept , 2009, 0903.4665.
[98] F. Siegert,et al. Event generation with SHERPA 1.1 , 2008, 0811.4622.
[99] M. Gigg,et al. Herwig++ physics and manual , 2008, 0803.0883.
[100] Costas G. Papadopoulos,et al. CutTools: a program implementing the OPP reduction method to compute one-loop amplitudes , 2007, 0711.3596.
[101] A. van Hameren,et al. PARNI for importance sampling and density estimation , 2007, 0710.2448.
[102] P. Nason. MINT: a Computer Program for Adaptive Monte Carlo Integration and Generation of Unweighted Distributions , 2007, 0709.2085.
[103] P. Nason,et al. Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method , 2007, 0709.2092.
[104] D. Soper,et al. Matching parton showers to NLO computations , 2005, hep-ph/0503053.
[105] B. Kerševan,et al. The Monte Carlo event generator AcerMC versions 2.0 to 3.8 with interfaces to PYTHIA 6.4, HERWIG 6.5 and ARIADNE 4.1 , 2004, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[106] Thomas Hahn,et al. Cuba - a library for multidimensional numerical integration , 2004, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[107] F. Krauss,et al. QCD Matrix Elements + Parton Showers , 2001, hep-ph/0109231.
[108] S. Jadach. Foam: Multi-dimensional general purpose Monte Carlo generator with self-adapting simplical grid , 1999, physics/9910004.
[109] T. Ohl. Vegas revisited : Adaptive Monte Carlo integration beyond factorization , 1998, hep-ph/9806432.
[110] R. Kleiss,et al. Weight optimization in multichannel Monte Carlo , 1994, hep-ph/9405257.
[111] G. Lepage. A new algorithm for adaptive multidimensional integration , 1978 .
[112] E. Byckling,et al. n-particle phase space in terms of invariant momentum transfers , 1969 .
[113] J. Winter,et al. Event generation with , 2009 .