Cow, farm, and management factors during the dry period that determine the rate of clinical mastitis after calving.

The purpose of the research was to investigate cow characteristics, farm facilities, and herd management strategies during the dry period to examine their joint influence on the rate of clinical mastitis after calving. Data were collected over a 2-yr period from 52 commercial dairy farms throughout England and Wales. Cows were separated for analysis into those housed for the dry period (8,710 cow-dry periods) and those at pasture (9,964 cow-dry periods). Multilevel models were used within a Bayesian framework with 2 response variables, the occurrence of a first case of clinical mastitis within the first 30 d of lactation and time to the first case of clinical mastitis during lactation. A variety of cow and herd management factors were identified as being associated with an increased rate of clinical mastitis and these were found to occur throughout the dry period. Significant cow factors were increased parity and at least one somatic cell count > or = 200,000 cells/mL in the 90 d before drying off. A number of management factors related to hygiene were significantly associated with an increased rate of clinical mastitis. These included measures linked to the administration of dry-cow treatments and management of the early and late dry-period accommodation and calving areas. Other farm factors associated with a reduced rate of clinical mastitis were vaccination with a leptospirosis vaccine, selection of dry-cow treatments for individual cows within a herd rather than for the herd as a whole, routine body condition scoring of cows at drying off, and a pasture rotation policy of grazing dry cows for a maximum of 2 wk before allowing the pasture to remain nongrazed for a period of 4 wk. Models demonstrated a good ability to predict the farm incidence rate of clinical mastitis in a given year, with model predictions explaining over 85% of the variability in the observed data. The research indicates that specific dry-period management strategies have an important influence on the rate of clinical mastitis during the next lactation.

[1]  S. Martin,et al.  Veterinary Epidemiologic Research , 2009 .

[2]  L. Green,et al.  National intervention study of mastitis control in dairy herds in England and Wales , 2007, Veterinary Record.

[3]  Stochastic modeling to determine the economic effects of blanket, selective, and no dry cow therapy. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  L. Green,et al.  Survey of the incidence and aetiology of mastitis on dairy farms in England and Wales , 2007, Veterinary Record.

[5]  A. C. Whist,et al.  Clinical mastitis in Norwegian herds after a combined selective dry-cow therapy and teat-dipping trial. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  L. Ferrucci,et al.  Frailty of older age: the role of the endocrine--immune interaction. , 2006, Current pharmaceutical design.

[7]  N. Weng.  Aging of the immune system: how much can the adaptive immune system adapt? , 2006, Immunity.

[8]  G. Pawelec,et al.  Aging and innate immunity. , 2006, Immunity.

[9]  H. Seegers,et al.  Incidence of intramammary infections during the dry period without or with antibiotic treatment in dairy cows--a quantitative analysis of published data. , 2006, Veterinary research.

[10]  P. Rajala-Schultz,et al.  Short communication: association between milk yield at dry-off and probability of intramammary infections at calving. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  P. Burton,et al.  Prevalence and associations between bacterial isolates from dry mammary glands of dairy cows , 2005, Veterinary Record.

[12]  William J. Browne,et al.  Bayesian and likelihood-based methods in multilevel modeling 1 A comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based methods for fitting multilevel models , 2006 .

[13]  Martin J. Green,et al.  The importance of the nonlactating period in the epidemiology of intramammary infection and strategies for prevention. , 2004, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[14]  P R Burton,et al.  The use of Markov chain Monte Carlo for analysis of correlated binary data: patterns of somatic cells in milk and the risk of clinical mastitis in dairy cows. , 2004, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[15]  D. Kelton,et al.  Association of cow and quarter-level factors at drying-off with new intramammary infections during the dry period. , 2004, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[16]  J. Hogan,et al.  Coliform mastitis. , 2003, Veterinary research.

[17]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  Modelling survival data in MLwiN 1.20 , 2003 .

[18]  Martin J. Green,et al.  A rational approach to dry cow therapy , 2002, In Practice.

[19]  G. Medley,et al.  Influence of dry period bacterial intramammary infection on clinical mastitis in dairy cows. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  J. Hillerton,et al.  The effect of an intramammary teat seal on new intramammary infections. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[22]  L. Green,et al.  Evaluation of the efficacy of an internal teat sealer during the dry period. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[23]  M. Green,et al.  An investigation of the impact of intramammary antibiotic dry cow therapy on clinical coliform mastitis. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[24]  M. Sanjuán,et al.  Serological study of the frequency of leptospiral infections among dairy cows in farms with suboptimal reproductive efficiency in Galicia, Spain. , 2001, Veterinary microbiology.

[25]  M. Green,et al.  A study of the incidence and significance of intramammary enterobacterial infections acquired during the dry period. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  A. Hope.  Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. , 2000 .

[27]  C. Heuer,et al.  Hyperketonemia and the impairment of udder defense: a review. , 2000, Veterinary research.

[28]  D. Vose,et al.  Risk assessment for veterinary biologicals , 1997 .

[29]  Peter Green,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1996 .

[30]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  POSTERIOR PREDICTIVE ASSESSMENT OF MODEL FITNESS VIA REALIZED DISCREPANCIES , 1996 .

[31]  W. D. Ray.  4. Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research , 1995 .

[32]  David Collett.  Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research , 1994 .

[33]  J. Hogan,et al.  Gram-negative bacterial infections of the mammary gland in cows. , 1991, American journal of veterinary research.

[34]  H. Goldstein.  Multilevel Statistical Models , 2006 .

[35]  D. Mackie,et al.  Bovine leptospirosis: some clinical features of serovar hardjo infection , 1985, Veterinary Record.

[36]  D. Todhunter,et al.  Environmental pathogens and intramammary infection during the dry period. , 1985, Journal of dairy science.

[37]  S. Oliver,et al.  Susceptibility of bovine mammary gland to infections during the dry period. , 1983, Journal of dairy science.

[38]  I. Dohoo,et al.  Somatic cell counts in bovine milk. , 1982, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[39]  F. H. Dodd,et al.  408. Udder infections in the ‘dry period’. I , 1950, Journal of Dairy Research.