DNA patents and scientific discovery and innovation: Assessing benefits and risks
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Normile. Monsanto Donates Its Share of Golden Rice , 2000, Science.
[2] R. Dreyfuss. Collaborative Research: Conflicts on Authorship, Ownership, and Accountability , 2000 .
[3] E. Pennisi. Stealth Genome Rocks Rice Researchers , 2000, Science.
[4] E Marshall,et al. A Deluge of Patents Creates Legal Hassles for Research , 2000, Science.
[5] Stephen M. Mount,et al. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. , 2000, Science.
[6] L Roberts,et al. SNP Mappers Confront Reality and Find It Daunting , 2000, Science.
[7] E. Marshall. Talks of Public-Private Deal End in Acrimony , 2000, Science.
[8] E Marshall,et al. Patent on HIV Receptor Provokes an Outcry , 2000, Science.
[9] M. Enserink. Patent Office May Raise the Bar on Gene Claims , 2000, Science.
[10] T. Reynolds. Gene patent race speeds ahead amid controversy, concern. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[11] T. Paul,et al. The "EST" Dilemma: Should the Discovery of a Part of a Gene Lead to a Patent That Could Cover the Entire Gene Once Discovered? , 1999 .
[12] M. Barinaga. Genentech, UC Settle Suit for $200 Million , 1999, Science.
[13] M. Friedberg,et al. Evaluation of conflict of interest in economic analyses of new drugs used in oncology. , 1999, JAMA.
[14] E. Marshall. A High-Stakes Gamble on Genome Sequencing , 1999, Science.
[15] M. Wadman. NIH strives to keep resource sharing alive , 1999, Nature.
[16] B. Knoppers. Status, sale and patenting of human genetic material: an international survey , 1999, Nature Genetics.
[17] E. Marshall. Drug Firms to Create Public Database of Genetic Mutations , 1999, Science.
[18] S. Nadis. US concern grows over secrecy clauses , 1999, Nature.
[19] Noel C. Harris. It's time to ‘out’ the selfish researchers , 1999, Nature.
[20] Thomas. Genomics and intellectual property rights. , 1999, Drug discovery today.
[21] Dick Thompson,et al. Racing to map our DNA. , 1999, Time.
[22] D. Resnik. Conflicts of Interest in Science , 1998, Perspectives on Science.
[23] D S Block,et al. Patenting Genomic Technologies , 1998, Science.
[24] J. L. Tribble. Gene Patents—A Pharmaceutical Perspective , 1998, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.
[25] G. Mcgee. Gene Patents Can Be Ethical , 1998, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.
[26] M. Cho,et al. Disease Genes Are Not Patentable: A Rebuttal of McGee , 1998, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.
[27] E. Vesell,et al. Genetic Variation as a Guide to Drug Development , 1998, Science.
[28] D. Nelkin,et al. Homo economicus: commercialization of body tissue in the age of biotechnology. , 1998, The Hastings Center report.
[29] J. Enríquez. Genomics and the World's Economy , 1998, Science.
[30] D. Resnik. Industry‐Sponsored Research: Secrecy versus Corporate Responsibility , 1998 .
[31] D. Resnik. The ethics of science , 1998 .
[32] M. Heller,et al. Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.
[33] J J Doll,et al. The Patenting of DNA , 1998, Science.
[34] Leonard,et al. Disease Gene Patenting Is a Bad Innovation. , 1997, Molecular diagnosis : a journal devoted to the understanding of human disease through the clinical application of molecular biology.
[35] M. Hanson. Religious voices in biotechnology: the case of gene patenting. , 1997, The Genetic resource.
[36] M. Hanson. Religious voices in biotechnology: the case of gene patenting. , 1997, The Hastings Center report.
[37] Melissa S. Anderson,et al. Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty. , 1997, JAMA.
[38] D. Resnik. The Morality of Human Gene Patents , 1997, Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal.
[39] Frederick H. Buttel,et al. University-Business Partnerships: An Assessment. , 1997 .
[40] Rebecca S. Eisenberg,et al. Structure and function in gene patenting , 1997, Nature Genetics.
[41] A. Jaffe. Trends and patterns in research and development expenditures in the United States. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[42] W. Gibbs. The Price of Silence , 1996 .
[43] P. Kahn. Coming to Grips With Genes and Risk , 1996, Science.
[44] C. Munthe,et al. The morality of scientific openness , 1996, Science and engineering ethics.
[45] L S Rothenberg,et al. Financial interests of authors in scientific journals: A pilot study of 14 publications , 1996, Science and engineering ethics.
[46] L. Guenin. Norms for patents concerning human and other life forms , 1996, Theoretical medicine.
[47] M. Svatos. Biotechnology and the Utilitarian Argument for Patents , 1996, Social Philosophy and Policy.
[48] W. M. Carson,et al. Drugs by design. , 1993, Scientific American.
[49] Henry E. Kyburg,et al. Science as Process. , 1993 .
[50] J. Andre,et al. Blocked Exchanges: A Taxonomy , 1992, Ethics.
[51] D. Kevles,et al. Plants as Intellectual Property: American Practice, Law, and Policy in World Context , 1992, Osiris.
[52] David L. Hull,et al. Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, David L. Hull. 1988. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. 608 pages. ISBN: 0-226-35060-4. $39.95 , 1989 .
[53] R. Davidson. Source of funding and outcome of clinical trials , 1986, Journal of general internal medicine.
[54] J. Ravetz. Sociology of Science , 1972, Nature.
[55] Jeremy Rifkin,et al. The Biotech Century , 1998 .
[56] T. Beardsley. Trends in biological research. Big-time biology. , 1994, Scientific American.
[57] A. Kantorovich. Scientific discovery , 1993 .
[58] Merrilee H. Salmon. Introduction to the Philosophy of Science , 1992 .