TEST OF A MULTISTAGE MODEL OF DISTAL AND PROXIMAL ANTECEDENTS OF LEADER PERFORMANCE

The authors developed and tested a multistage model of distal and proximal predictors of leader performance in an effort to shed greater light on the intermediate linkages between broad leader traits and performance. Predictor and criterion data were obtained from 471 noncommissioned officers in the U.S. Army. A model with cognitive ability and 3 of the Big 5 personality factors as distal antecedents, leadership experiences and motivation to lead as semidistal antecedents, and the knowledge, skills, and ability (KSAs) to lead as proximal antecedents of leader performance provided a good fit to the data. More specifically, the effects of the distal and semidistal antecedents on leader performance were partially mediated by more proximal variables, whereas leader KSAs demonstrated a relatively strong, direct influence on performance. The 1 exception was that Conscientiousness—a hypothesized distal antecedent—had a notable direct effect on leader performance. The implications of these findings for leadership research and practice are discussed.

[1]  J. Hunter.  Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance , 1986 .

[2]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  The interplay between theory and method , 2007 .

[3]  W. Borman,et al.  A Theory of Individual Differences in Task and Contextual Performance , 1997 .

[4]  Derek R. Avery,et al.  The impact of multiple measures of leader experience on leader effectiveness ☆: New insights for leader selection , 2003 .

[5]  S. Zaccaro,et al.  Trait-based perspectives of leadership. , 2007, The American psychologist.

[6]  M. Ree,et al.  Armed Forces Qualification Test as a Measure of Premorbid Intelligence , 2001 .

[7]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Leadership: do traits matter? , 1991 .

[8]  Huy Le,et al.  Increasing the Accuracy of Corrections for Range Restriction: Implications for Selection Procedure Validities and Other Research Results , 2006 .

[9]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Determinants, Detection and Amelioration of Adverse Impact in Personnel Selection Procedures: Issues, Evidence and Lessons Learned , 2001 .

[10]  John P. Campbell,et al.  A Confirmatory Test of a Model of Performance Determinants , 1994 .

[11]  W. Bennis,et al.  The challenges of leadership in the modern world: introduction to the special issue. , 2007, The American psychologist.

[12]  Charles E. Lance,et al.  Why Assessment Centers Do Not Work the Way They Are Supposed To , 2008, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[13]  F. Drasgow,et al.  Toward a theory of individual differences and leadership: understanding the motivation to lead. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  Stephanie C Payne,et al.  Beyond the Big Five: Leader Goal Orientation as a Predictor of Leadership Effectiveness , 2007 .

[15]  Eric D. Heggestad,et al.  Forced-choice assessments of personality for selection: evaluating issues of normative assessment and faking resistance. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  L. Eastman,et al.  Linking management selection and development through stretch assignments , 1995 .

[17]  T. Judge,et al.  Structural model of employee involvement in skill development activity: The role of individual differences , 2008 .

[18]  E. A. Fleishman,et al.  Leadership skills for a changing world: Solving complex social problems. , 2000 .

[19]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Relationship between conscientiousness and learning in employee training: mediating influences of self-deception and self-efficacy. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  John P. Hausknecht,et al.  Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: An Updated Model and Meta-Analysis , 2004 .

[21]  Soon Ang,et al.  Personality and leader effectiveness: a moderated mediation model of leadership self-efficacy, job demands, and job autonomy. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  P. Bobko,et al.  ETHNIC GROUP DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE ABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT AND EDUCATIONAL SETTINGS: A META‐ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[23]  Walter C. Borman,et al.  Models of supervisory job performance ratings , 1991 .

[24]  Walter C. Borman,et al.  Role of Early Supervisory Experience in Supervisor Performance , 1993 .

[25]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Exploring the relationship of leadership skills and knowledge to leader performance , 2000 .

[26]  P. Warr,et al.  Correlates and perceived outcomes of four types of employee development activity. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  Elizabeth M. Weiss,et al.  A model of involvement in work-related learning and development activity: the effects of individual, situational, motivational, and age variables. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  T. Judge,et al.  Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  Nambury S. Raju,et al.  Determining the Significance of Correlations Corrected for Unreliability and Range Restriction , 2003 .

[31]  Huy Le,et al.  Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis methods and findings. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  Anton J. Villado,et al.  The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  G. Johns.  The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior , 2006 .

[34]  R. Kark,et al.  Motivation to Lead, Motivation to Follow: The Role of the Self-Regulatory Focus in Leadership Processes , 2007 .

[35]  Paul E. Tesluk,et al.  Toward an integrated model of work experience. , 1998 .

[36]  F. Schmidt,et al.  The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. , 1998 .

[37]  Alice N. Outerbridge,et al.  Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance , 1986 .

[38]  Jorge L. Mendoza,et al.  Fisher transformations for correlations corrected for selection and missing data , 1993 .

[39]  Anthony P. Ammeter,et al.  Toward a political theory of leadership , 2002 .

[40]  P. Bobko.  An analysis of correlations corrected for attenuation and range restriction. , 1983 .

[41]  J. Colquitt,et al.  Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: a meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[42]  Deniz S. Ones,et al.  GROUP DIFFERENCES IN PERSONALITY: META‐ANALYSES COMPARING FIVE U.S. RACIAL GROUPS , 2008 .

[43]  Gilad Chen,et al.  Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. , 2000 .

[44]  John P. Campbell,et al.  Exploring the Limits in Personnel Selection and Classification , 2001 .

[45]  Y. Fried,et al.  Location, location, location: contextualizing organizational research* , 2001 .

[46]  T. Judge,et al.  Intelligence and leadership: a quantitative review and test of theoretical propositions. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[47]  V. Vroom,et al.  The role of the situation in leadership. , 2007, The American psychologist.

[48]  B. Avolio,et al.  Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building. , 2007, The American psychologist.