The effects of tool handle shape on hand performance, usability and discomfort using masons' trowels

Abstract The effects of five new different handle shapes on hand performance capabilities, usability and discomfort, and also the relationship between these variables were evaluated in the context of masonry work and using masons’ trowels as an exemplar hand tool. The prototype handles were designed to provide different patterns of grip so that they could be suited to the hand/tool interaction in particular hand areas. The results showed significant effect of tool handle shape on the hand grip effort, usability, and hand and finger discomfort assessments, but not on the time to complete the masonry task. The hand grip effort and usability were negatively correlated with subjective assessment of hand and finger discomfort, so that a lower level of hand and finger discomfort corresponded to higher hand grip exertion and usability. These findings provide a better insight into the performance and usability issues when using hand tools which can be applied by tool manufacturers to improve industrial hand tool design. Relevance to industry These findings present a unique insight into the handle design for industrial hand tool use and support the general conclusion that objective measurements should be supplemented by qualitative subjective assessments to provide a more holistic approach where specific and additional details about the hand tool design characteristics are incorporated from the workers' perspective.

[1]  Zahra Ghanbari,et al.  Psychometric properties of the persian language version of the system usability scale. , 2014, Health promotion perspectives.

[2]  Iman Dianat,et al.  Working conditions of Iranian hand-sewn shoe workers and associations with musculoskeletal symptoms , 2014, Ergonomics.

[3]  Peter Vink,et al.  One set of pliers for more tasks in installation work: the effects on (dis)comfort and productivity. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  John R. Myers,et al.  Hand tool injuries at work: A surveillance perspective , 1988 .

[5]  R Toivonen,et al.  Effects of two ergonomic aids on the usability of an in-line screwdriver. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  Alex W Stedmon,et al.  Design options for improving protective gloves for industrial assembly work. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  Andris Freivalds,et al.  Tool Evaluation and Design , 2012 .

[8]  Yong-Ku Kong,et al.  Comparison of comfort, discomfort, and continuum ratings of force levels and hand regions during gripping exertions. , 2012, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  P Vink,et al.  Association between objective and subjective measurements of comfort and discomfort in hand tools. , 2007, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  Kai Way Li.  Ergonomic evaluation of a fixture used for power driven wire-tying hand tools , 2003 .

[11]  Yong-Ku Kong,et al.  Optimal cylindrical handle diameter for grip force tasks , 2005 .

[12]  Helmut Strasser,et al.  Electromyographic and subjective evaluation of hand tools: The example of masons' trowels , 1996 .

[13]  B. Thomas,et al.  Usability Evaluation In Industry , 1996 .

[14]  D. Chaffin,et al.  A proposed standard procedure for static muscle strength testing. , 1974, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[15]  Jalil Nazari,et al.  Working Conditions in Carpet Weaving Workshops and Muscu-loskeletal Complaints among Workers in Tabriz - Iran. , 2012, Health promotion perspectives.

[16]  Yong-Ku Kong,et al.  Evaluation of handle shapes for screwdriving. , 2008, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  L. Punnett,et al.  Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. , 2004, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[18]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[19]  P. Buckle,et al.  The nature of work-related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[20]  Alex W Stedmon,et al.  Short and longer duration effects of protective gloves on hand performance capabilities and subjective assessments in a screw-driving task , 2010, Ergonomics.

[21]  D. E. Welcome,et al.  An investigation on the relationship between grip, push and contact forces applied to a tool handle , 2004 .

[22]  D. E. Welcome,et al.  Contact pressure distribution at hand–handle interface: role of hand forces and handle size , 2005 .

[23]  Minna Päivinen,et al.  The usability and ergonomics of axes. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[24]  Luca Weisz,et al.  Quick And Dirty , 2016 .

[25]  Gregor Harih,et al.  Tool-handle design based on a digital human hand model , 2013 .

[26]  B D Lowe,et al.  Evaluation of handle design characteristics in a maximum screwdriving torque task , 2007, Ergonomics.

[27]  Gregor Harih,et al.  Comparison of subjective comfort ratings between anatomically shaped and cylindrical handles. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[28]  Alex W Stedmon,et al.  Using pliers in assembly work: short and long task duration effects of gloves on hand performance capabilities and subjective assessments of discomfort and ease of tool manipulation. , 2012, Applied ergonomics.

[29]  A Freivalds,et al.  Ergonomics evaluation of a foam rubber grip for tool handles. , 1991, Applied ergonomics.

[30]  Yuan-Ho Chen,et al.  Evaluation of bent-handled files , 2000 .

[31]  S. Tanaka,et al.  Association of occupational and non-occupational risk factors with the prevalence of self-reported carpal tunnel syndrome in a national survey of the working population. , 1998, American journal of industrial medicine.

[32]  A Mital,et al.  Injuries due to handtools. Results of a questionnaire. , 1987, Applied ergonomics.