Impact of right hemispheric damage on a hierarchy of complexity evidenced in young normal subjects

The occurrence of a right-hemisphere lesion can interfere with pragmatic abilities and particularly with the processing of non-literal speech acts in which the listener has to identify the speaker's intention. The aim of this study was to test RHD subjects' ability to process non-literal speech acts. A chronometric approach to RHD and matched control performance showed that RHD subjects are impaired in the processing of non-literal speech, though they are also sensitive to the hierarchy of complexity among types. Only the processing of indirect speech acts was not shown to differ from that of normals, probably because the stimuli were of the conventional type. These results show the relevancy of a chronometric approach. They also emphasize the importance of further studying RHD subjects' ability to attribute intentions to protagonists in a short story.

[1]  H. H. Clark.  Responding to indirect speech acts , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Script knowledge in right hemisphere-damaged and in normal elderly adults , 1987, Brain and Language.

[3]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Polite responses to polite requests , 1980, Cognition.

[4]  Antonia Chandrasegaran,et al.  Right Hemisphere Language Comprehension , 1999 .

[5]  Ellen Perecman,et al.  Cognitive processing in the right hemisphere , 1983 .

[6]  H. Grice.  Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[7]  William Hirst,et al.  Constraints on the processing of indirect speech acts: Evidence from aphasiology , 1984, Brain and Language.

[8]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  N. Foldi,et al.  Appreciation of pragmatic interpretations of indirect commands: Comparison of right and left hemisphere brain-damaged patients , 1987, Brain and Language.

[10]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[11]  C. Code.  Language, Aphasia and the Right Hemisphere , 1987 .

[12]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Surprise but not coherence: Sensitivity to verbal humor in right-hemisphere patients , 1983, Brain and Language.

[13]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Understanding what is meant from what is said: A study in conversationally conveyed requests , 1975 .

[14]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Comprehension of humorous and nonhumorous materials by left and right brain-damaged patients , 1986, Brain and Cognition.

[15]  Jacques Virbel,et al.  The Differential (?) Processing of Literal and Nonliteral Speech Acts: A Psycholinguistic Approach , 1999, CONTEXT.

[16]  Donna B. Pincus,et al.  Distinguishing Lies from Jokes: Theory of Mind Deficits and Discourse Interpretation in Right Hemisphere Brain-Damaged Patients , 1998, Brain and Language.

[17]  J. Mahon.  The Poetics of Mind , 1996 .

[18]  H. Gardner,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in the apprehension of complex linguistic materials , 1981, Brain and Language.

[19]  H. Gardner,et al.  Sensitivity to Emotional Expressions and Situations in Organic Patients , 1980, Cortex.

[20]  H. Gardner,et al.  Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients , 1986, Brain and Language.

[21]  Y. Joanette,et al.  Production and Evaluation of Requests by Right Hemisphere Brain-Damaged Individuals , 1994, Brain and Language.

[22]  B. Ska,et al.  Processing of speech acts by right hemisphere brain-damaged patients: An ecological approach , 2000 .

[23]  Roger Wales,et al.  An investigation of the ability to process inferences in language following right hemisphere brain damage , 1986, Brain and Language.

[24]  R. Gibbs.  A critical examination of the contribution of literal meaning to understanding nonliteral discourse , 1982 .

[25]  H. Gardner,et al.  The comprehension of metaphor in brain-damaged patients. , 1977, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  H. Gardner,et al.  9 – Missing the Point: The Role of the Right Hemisphere in the Processing of Complex Linguistic Materials1 , 1983 .

[27]  H. Gardner,et al.  The effects of right hemisphere damage on the pragmatic interpretation of conversational remarks , 1990, Brain and Language.

[28]  Y. Joanette,et al.  Right Hemisphere and Verbal Communication , 1989 .

[29]  H. Gardner,et al.  Appreciation of indirect requests by left- and right-brain-damaged patients: The effects of verbal context and conventionality of wording , 1989, Brain and Language.

[30]  J. Austin.  How to do things with words , 1962 .

[31]  H. Brownell,et al.  Making Requests: Illustrations of How Right-Hemisphere Brain Damage Can Affect Discourse Production , 1999, Brain and Language.