Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007.

BACKGROUND The use of computed tomographic (CT) scans in the United States (US) has increased more than 3-fold since 1993 to approximately 70 million scans annually. Despite the great medical benefits, there is concern about the potential radiation-related cancer risk. We conducted detailed estimates of the future cancer risks from current CT scan use in the US according to age, sex, and scan type. METHODS Risk models based on the National Research Council's "Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation" report and organ-specific radiation doses derived from a national survey were used to estimate age-specific cancer risks for each scan type. These models were combined with age- and sex-specific scan frequencies for the US in 2007 obtained from survey and insurance claims data. We estimated the mean number of radiation-related incident cancers with 95% uncertainty limits (UL) using Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS Overall, we estimated that approximately 29 000 (95% UL, 15 000-45 000) future cancers could be related to CT scans performed in the US in 2007. The largest contributions were from scans of the abdomen and pelvis (n = 14 000) (95% UL, 6900-25 000), chest (n = 4100) (95% UL, 1900-8100), and head (n = 4000) (95% UL, 1100-8700), as well as from chest CT angiography (n = 2700) (95% UL, 1300-5000). One-third of the projected cancers were due to scans performed at the ages of 35 to 54 years compared with 15% due to scans performed at ages younger than 18 years, and 66% were in females. CONCLUSIONS These detailed estimates highlight several areas of CT scan use that make large contributions to the total cancer risk, including several scan types and age groups with a high frequency of use or scans involving relatively high doses, in which risk-reduction efforts may be warranted.

[1]  D. Broga,et al.  Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States , 2009 .

[2]  K. P. Kim,et al.  Coronary artery calcification screening: estimated radiation dose and cancer risk. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  A. Sodickson,et al.  Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. , 2009, Radiology.

[4]  A. Sodickson,et al.  Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimates in emergency department patients undergoing repeat or multiple CT. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  L. Feinendegen,et al.  The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. , 2009, Radiology.

[6]  Richard Wakeford,et al.  Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do. , 2009, Radiology.

[7]  Colin R Muirhead,et al.  Review of relative biological effectiveness dependence on linear energy transfer for low-LET radiations , 2009, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[8]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. , 2009, JAMA.

[9]  Mythreyi Bhargavan,et al.  MEDICAL RADIATION EXPOSURE IN THE U.S. IN 2006: PRELIMINARY RESULTS , 2008, Health physics.

[10]  Kwang Pyo Kim,et al.  Low-dose lung computed tomography screening before age 55: estimates of the mortality reduction required to outweigh the radiation-induced cancer risk , 2008, Journal of medical screening.

[11]  Donald P Frush,et al.  Pediatric body MDCT: a 5-year follow-up survey of scanning parameters used by pediatric radiologists. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  K. Strauss,et al.  The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Kent M. Ogden,et al.  Computing effective doses to pediatric patients undergoing body CT examinations , 2008, Pediatric Radiology.

[14]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  C J Martin,et al.  Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures? , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  A. Einstein,et al.  Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2007, JAMA.

[17]  D. L. Preston,et al.  Solid Cancer Incidence in Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958–1998 , 2007, Radiation research.

[18]  Michael J Pentecost,et al.  American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[19]  W. Veldkamp,et al.  16-slice CT: achievable effective doses of common protocols in comparison with recent CT dose surveys. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[20]  Adrian K. Dixon,et al.  Benefits and costs, an eternal balance , 2007 .

[21]  Walter Huda,et al.  Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  J. Valentin,et al.  Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography(MDCT). ICRP Publication 102. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[23]  Division on Earth Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 , 2006 .

[24]  J. Valentin,et al.  Contents, preface, executive summary, chapters 1 and 2 , 2005 .

[25]  J. Valentin,et al.  Low-dose extrapolation of radiation-related cancer risk. , 2005, Annals of the ICRP.

[26]  David J Brenner,et al.  Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. , 2004, Radiology.

[27]  Amy Berrington de González,et al.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries , 2004, The Lancet.

[28]  Erik Holmberg,et al.  Radiation Effects on Breast Cancer Risk: A Pooled Analysis of Eight Cohorts , 2002, Radiation research.

[29]  岩崎 民子 SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION : United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes , 2002 .

[30]  G. Stamm,et al.  [CT-expo--a novel program for dose evaluation in CT]. , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[31]  C. Douglas Maynard,et al.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria , 2000 .

[32]  J H Lubin,et al.  Thyroid cancer after exposure to external radiation: a pooled analysis of seven studies. , 1995, Radiation research.

[33]  W. Eckelman,et al.  NCRP report no. 93: Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, Maryland (1987). US$15.00 , 1988 .

[34]  C E Land,et al.  Estimating cancer risks from low doses of ionizing radiation. , 1980, Science.

[35]  R. H. Chamberlain Medical radiation exposure. , 1962, The New physician.