Bulletin Personality and Social Psychology Confronting Prejudice (literally): Reactions to Confrontations of Racial and Gender Bias on Behalf Of: Society for Personality and Social Psychology

Participants in two studies reported how they would feel, think, and behave after being confronted about either gender-biased or equivalent racial-biased responses. In Study 2, whether the confrontation was from a target group member (Black or female) or nontarget (White or male) group member was manipulated. Regardless of confronter status, allegations of racial bias elicited more guilt and apologetic-corrective responses and greater concern over having offended the confronter than similar confrontations of gender bias, which elicited more amusement. Target confrontations elicited less guilt but greater discomfort than nontarget confrontations and were associated with feelings of irritation and antagonism among more prejudiced participants. In addition, participants perceived a target’s confrontation as more of an overreaction than the same confrontation from a nontarget. The implications of these findings for prejudice-reduction efforts are discussed.

[1]  S. Lemon,et al.  The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory : Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism , 2001 .

[2]  Joe R. Feagin,et al.  The Continuing Significance of Race : Antiblack Discrimination in Public Places , 1991 .

[3]  J. Bargh.  The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. , 1999 .

[4]  C. Stangor,et al.  Stereotypes and Stereotyping , 1996 .

[5]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change , 1978 .

[6]  S. Fiske,et al.  What's so special about sex? Gender stereotyping and discrimination. , 1993 .

[7]  Stuart Oskamp,et al.  Gender issues in contemporary society , 1993 .

[8]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory , 1996 .

[9]  P. Devine,et al.  Automaticity and control in stereotyping. , 1999 .

[10]  B. K. Smith,et al.  An American dilemma. , 1974, MH.

[11]  C. Voils,et al.  Proneness to prejudiced responses: toward understanding the authenticity of self-reported discrepancies. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  M. J. Monteith,et al.  Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice-reduction efforts. , 1993 .

[13]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Just say no (to stereotyping): effects of training in the negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[15]  G. Cowan,et al.  Judgments of Hate Speech: The Effects of Target Group, Publicness, and Behavioral Responses of the Target , 1996 .

[16]  Cheryl R. Kaiser,et al.  Stop Complaining! The Social Costs of Making Attributions to Discrimination , 2001 .

[17]  S. Fiske,et al.  Ambivalent stereotypes as legitimizing ideologies: Differentiating paternalistic and envious prejudice. , 2001 .

[18]  Robin M. Kowalski,et al.  Complaints and complaining: functions, antecedents, and consequences. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  J. N. Shelton,et al.  A Reconceptualization of How We Study Issues of Racial Prejudice , 2000 .

[20]  Alexander M. Czopp,et al.  Putting the brakes on prejudice: on the development and operation of cues for control. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Preconscious Control of Stereotype Activation Through Chronic Egalitarian Goals , 1999 .

[22]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  Simulation, Scenarios, and Emotional Appraisal: Testing the Convergence of Real and Imagined Reactions to Emotional Stimuli , 2001 .

[23]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[24]  M. Rodin,et al.  Asymmetry in prejudice attribution , 1990 .

[25]  A. Elliot,et al.  Prejudice with and without compunction , 1991 .

[26]  J. Brigham,et al.  College Students’ Racial Attitudes , 1993 .

[27]  L. Vaughn,et al.  Reducing the Expression of Racial Prejudice , 1991 .

[28]  J. Swim,et al.  Experiencing Everyday Prejudice and Discrimination , 1998 .

[29]  R. Fazio,et al.  PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN Fazio, Hilden / EMOTIONAL REACTIONS TO A PREJUDICED RESPONSE Emotional Reactions to a Seemingly Prejudiced Response: The Role of Automatically Activated Racial Attitudes and Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions , 2001 .

[30]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Personal narratives about guilt: Role in action control and interpersonal relationships. , 1995 .

[31]  C. Stangor,et al.  Prejudice : the target's perspective , 1999 .

[32]  J. Dovidio,et al.  The aversive form of racism. , 1986 .

[33]  Janet K. Swim,et al.  Excuse me : What did you just say?! : Women's public and private responses to sexist remarks , 1999 .

[34]  J. Brigham,et al.  Condemning and condoning racism : a social context approach to interracial settings , 1994 .

[35]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  The norm of self-interest and its effects on social action. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  M. J. Monteith,et al.  The Effect of Social Norm Activation on the Expression of Opinions Concerning Gay Men and Blacks , 1996 .

[37]  J. Feagin.  The Continuing Significance of Race : Antiblack Discrimination in Public Places , 1991 .

[38]  R. Petty,et al.  INDIVIDUAL VERSUS GROUP INTEREST VIOLATION: SURPRISE AS A DETERMINANT OF ARGUMENT SCRUTINY AND PERSUASION , 2001 .

[39]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Reducing intergroup bias: elements of intergroup cooperation. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  John T. Jost,et al.  The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations , 2001 .

[41]  M. Rokeach.  The Nature Of Human Values , 1974 .

[42]  P. Devine,et al.  Self-Directed Versus Other-Directed Affect as a Consequence of Prejudice-Related Discrepancies , 2004 .

[43]  J. B. Mcconahay,et al.  Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. , 1986 .