A sequential consideration for assembly sequence planning and assembly line balancing using the connector concept

In an ever-changing era, fast responses in the research and development (R&D) of products should be made to satisfy the various needs of customers. The sequential consideration for assembly sequence planning and assembly line balancing can contribute to shrinking the gap between design and manufacturing. The so-called assembly sequence planning refers to a task in which planners arrange a specific assembly sequence according to the product design description as well as to their particular heuristics in assembling all the components of a product. Assembly line balancing is concerned with how to effectively arrange every assembly task so as to reach the highest efficiency and the shortest idling time in the total assembly line. In this study, connectors equipped with assembly engineering information (combination, direction, tool, and cycle time) serve as the basic units to replace the traditional method in which only parts are taken into consideration. Connectors can be defined as the basic units that offer limitations to components, and when these units are combined, they will perform the required functions. Under the constraints of connector-based precedence graph, similarity between connectors is used to arrange the assembly tasks. When the result meets the cycle-time requirements and the types of stations to which the connectors belong, the arrangement of stations based on the assembly sequential order is processed. Genetic algorithms are proposed to solve the arrangement of connectors and the selection of stations. Two examples illustrate how to apply the model in practical cases.

[1]  Subhash C. Sarin,et al.  A survey of the assembly line balancing procedures , 1998 .

[2]  E. H. Bowman.  Assembly-Line Balancing by Linear Programming , 1960 .

[3]  Thomas L. DeFazio,et al.  Simplified generation of all mechanical assembly sequences , 1987, IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Alain Delchambre,et al.  An integrated approach for product family and assembly system design , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[5]  Soumen Ghosh,et al.  A comprehensive literature review and analysis of the design, balancing and scheduling of assembly systems , 1989 .

[6]  Roger V. Johnson.  Assembly line balancing algorithms: computation comparisons , 1981 .

[7]  K. Ghosh,et al.  Representation and selection of assembly sequences in computer-aided assembly process planning , 1997 .

[8]  Loren Paul Rees,et al.  Assembly Line Balancing Using Genetic Algorithms with Heuristic‐Generated Initial Populations and Multiple Evaluation Criteria* , 1994 .

[9]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development , 2000 .

[10]  J. H. Liu,et al.  A concurrent hierarchical evolution approach to assembly process planning , 2002 .

[11]  Hirokazu Osaki,et al.  The Method of Analysis of Assembly Work Based on the Fastener Method , 1980 .

[12]  Hwai-En Tseng,et al.  Connector-based approach to assembly planning using a genetic algorithm , 2004 .

[13]  Thomas L. DeFazio,et al.  An integrated computer aid for generating and evaluating assembly sequences for mechanical products , 1991, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[14]  Brahim Rekiek,et al.  A multiple objective grouping genetic algorithm for assembly line design , 2001, J. Intell. Manuf..

[15]  Zhou-Ping Yin,et al.  A connector-based hierarchical approach to assembly sequence planning for mechanical assemblies , 2003, Comput. Aided Des..

[16]  Ralph Mosser Barnes,et al.  Motion and Time Study: Design and Measurement of Work , 1968 .

[17]  John K. Jackman,et al.  Evaluating assembly sequences for automatic assembly systems , 1995 .