Coordination and inhomogeneous activation of human arm muscles during isometric torques.

1. In this study we have recorded the activity of motor units of the important muscles acting across the elbow joint during combinations of voluntary isometric torques in flexion/extension direction and supination/pronation direction at different angles of the elbow joint. 2. Most muscles are not activated homogeneously; instead the population of motor units of muscles can be subdivided into several subpopulations. Inhomogeneous activation of the population of motor units in a muscle is a general finding and is not restricted to some multifunctional muscles. 3. Muscles can be activated even if their mechanical action does not contribute directly to the external torque. For example, m. triceps is activated during supination torques and thus compensates for the flexion component of the m. biceps. On the other hand, motor units in muscles are not necessarily activated if their mechanical action contributes to a prescribed torque. For example, there are motor units in the m. biceps that are activated during flexion torques, but not during supination torques. 4. The relative activation of the muscles depends on the elbow angle. Changing the elbow angle affects the mechanical advantage of different muscles differently. In general, muscles with the larger mechanical advantage receive the larger input. 5. We have calculated the relative contributions of some muscles to isometric torques. These contributions depend on the combination of the torques exerted. 6. Existing theoretical models on muscle coordination do not incorporate subpopulations of motor units and therefore need to be amended.

[1]  J. Basmajian,et al.  Integrated actions and functions of the chief flexors of the elbow: a detailed electromyographic analysis. , 1957, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  E. Henneman Relation between size of neurons and their susceptibility to discharge. , 1957, Science.

[3]  F. Buchthal,et al.  Motor unit territory in different human muscles. , 1959, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[4]  a.R.V.,et al.  Clinical neurophysiology , 1961, Neurology.

[5]  Simons Dg,et al.  Effect of wrist rotation on the XY plot of averaged biceps EMG and isometric tension. , 1970 .

[6]  Effect of wrist rotation on the XY plot of averaged biceps EMG and isometric tension. , 1970, American journal of physical medicine.

[7]  S. Bouisset,et al.  Integrated electromyographical activity and muscle work. , 1973, Journal of applied physiology.

[8]  S. Bouisset EMG and Muscle Force in Normal Motor Activities , 1973 .

[9]  J C Cnockaert,et al.  Relative contribution of individual muscles to the isometric contraction of a muscular group. , 1975, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  B. P. Yeo Investigations concerning the principle of minimal total muscular force. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  E. M. Schmidt,et al.  Facility of motor unit control during tasks defined directly in terms of unit behaviors , 1978, Experimental Neurology.

[12]  Roy D. Crowninshield,et al.  Use of Optimization Techniques to Predict Muscle Forces , 1978 .

[13]  A. Pellionisz,et al.  Tensorial approach to the geometry of brain function: Cerebellar coordination via a metric tensor , 1980, Neuroscience.

[14]  H. E. Desnedt,et al.  Spinal motoneuron recruitment in man: rank deordering with direction but not with speed of voluntary movement. , 1981, Science.

[15]  S R Simon,et al.  An evaluation of the approaches of optimization models in the prediction of muscle forces during human gait. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  C. C. A. M. Gielen,et al.  Changes in recruitment order of motor units in the human biceps muscle , 1982, Experimental Neurology.

[18]  C. Gielen,et al.  Relation between location of a motor unit in the human biceps brachii and its critical firing levels for different tasks , 1984, Experimental Neurology.

[19]  M. A. Townsend,et al.  Muscular synergism--I. On criteria for load sharing between synergistic muscles. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  G. E. Johnson,et al.  Muscular synergism--II. A minimum-fatigue criterion for load sharing between synergistic muscles. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Z. Hasan,et al.  Isometric torque-angle relationship and movement-related activity of human elbow flexors: implications for the equilibrium-point hypothesis. , 1985, Experimental brain research.

[22]  G. Loeb Motoneurone task groups: coping with kinematic heterogeneity. , 1985, The Journal of experimental biology.

[23]  ter Bm Bart Haar Romeny,et al.  Behaviour of motor units of human arm muscles: differences between slow isometric contraction and relaxation , 1985 .

[24]  C. Gielen,et al.  Coordination of arm muscles during flexion and supination: Application of the tensor analysis approach , 1986, Neuroscience.

[25]  T. Miles,et al.  Length‐related changes in activation threshold and wave form of motor units in human masseter muscle. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  W. Rymer,et al.  Characteristics of synergic relations during isometric contractions of human elbow muscles. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  T. Yoneda,et al.  Recruitment threshold force and its changing type of motor units during voluntary contraction at various speeds in man , 1986, Brain Research.

[28]  R. Stein,et al.  Motor-unit recruitment in human first dorsal interosseous muscle for static contractions in three different directions. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Michael J. O'Donovan,et al.  Cat hindlimb motoneurons during locomotion. III. Functional segregation in sartorius. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  J. J. D. Gon,et al.  A biomechanical model for flexion torques of human arm muscles as a function of elbow angle. , 1988 .