Neural mechanisms of goal-contingent task disengagement: Response-irrelevant stimuli activate the default mode network

As we experience the world, we must decide not only when and how to act based on input from the environment, but also when to avoid responding in situations where acting could lead to a detrimental outcome. The ability to regulate behavior in this way requires flexible cognitive control, as the same stimulus may call for a response in one context but not in another. In this sense, explicit non-responding can be characterized as an active, goal-directed cognitive process. Little is known about the mechanisms by which a currently active goal state modulates information processing to support the avoidance of undesired responding. In the present study, participants executed or withheld responses to a color target based whether its color matched that of a cue at the beginning of each trial. Behavioral and neural responses to task-irrelevant stimuli appearing as distractors were examined as a function of their relationship to the currently response-relevant color indicated by the cue. We observed a robust pattern in which stimuli possessing the currently response-irrelevant feature activate the default mode network (DMN), which was associated with a behavioral cost on trials in which this stimulus competed with a response-relevant target. Our findings reveal a role for the DMN in goal-directed cognitive control, facilitating active disengagement based on contextually-specific task demands.

[1]  C. Folk,et al.  Contingent involuntary motoric inhibition: the involuntary inhibition of a motor response contingent on top-down goals. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[3]  Hyoung F. Kim,et al.  Why skill matters , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Cortical and Subcortical Contributions to Stop Signal Response Inhibition: Role of the Subthalamic Nucleus , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  C. Li,et al.  Dissociable Roles of Right Inferior Frontal Cortex and Anterior Insula in Inhibitory Control: Evidence from Intrinsic and Task-Related Functional Parcellation, Connectivity, and Response Profile Analyses across Multiple Datasets , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  C. Folk,et al.  Conditional Automaticity in Response Selection , 2014, Psychological science.

[7]  Maneesh C. Patel,et al.  Distinct frontal systems for response inhibition, attentional capture, and error processing , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Andrew B. Leber,et al.  Coordination of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Attentional Control in Human Cortex , 2005, Psychological science.

[9]  J. Pekar,et al.  Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  M. Mintun,et al.  The default mode network and self-referential processes in depression , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  M. Corbetta,et al.  The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind , 2008, Neuron.

[12]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Common Blood Flow Changes across Visual Tasks: II. Decreases in Cerebral Cortex , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  M. Rosenberg,et al.  In the zone or zoning out? Tracking behavioral and neural fluctuations during sustained attention. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  Kristina M. Visscher,et al.  The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Inhibition-related Activation in the Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus in the Absence of Inhibitory Cues , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: Evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Sterling C. Johnson,et al.  A generalized form of context-dependent psychophysiological interactions (gPPI): A comparison to standard approaches , 2012, NeuroImage.

[19]  T. Braver Working Memory , Cognitive Control , and the Prefrontal Cortex : Computational and Empirical Studies , 2000 .

[20]  K. Berridge,et al.  What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? , 1998, Brain Research Reviews.

[21]  Darryl W. Schneider,et al.  Automatic and Controlled Response Inhibition: Associative Learning in the Go/no-go and Stop-signal Paradigms the Go/no-go Paradigm and the Stop-signal Paradigm , 2022 .

[22]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[23]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Event‐related fMRI study of response inhibition , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[24]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Prefrontal‐subcortical dissociations underlying inhibitory control revealed by event‐related fMRI , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[25]  K. Berridge From prediction error to incentive salience: mesolimbic computation of reward motivation , 2012, The European journal of neuroscience.

[26]  Hiroshi Fukuda,et al.  The human prefrontal and parietal association cortices are involved in NO-GO performances—an event-related fMRI study , 2000, NeuroImage.

[27]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[28]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity of default mode network components: Correlation, anticorrelation, and causality , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[29]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  D G Pelli,et al.  Pixel independence: measuring spatial interactions on a CRT display. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[31]  E. Koechlin,et al.  The role of the anterior prefrontal cortex in human cognition , 1999, Nature.

[32]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[33]  Frederick Verbruggen,et al.  Response Suppression by Automatic Retrieval of Stimulus–Stop Association: Evidence from Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[35]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Predicting Success: Patterns of Cortical Activation and Deactivation Prior to Response Inhibition , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Simon B Eickhoff,et al.  Investigating the Functional Heterogeneity of the Default Mode Network Using Coordinate-Based Meta-Analytic Modeling , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  J. Bargh Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. , 1989 .

[39]  T. Robbins,et al.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  David Badre,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evidence for a Hierarchical Organization of the Prefrontal Cortex , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Raichle,et al.  The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  H Garavan,et al.  A midline dissociation between error-processing and response-conflict monitoring , 2003, NeuroImage.

[43]  Arno Klein,et al.  A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration , 2011, NeuroImage.

[44]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[45]  J. Yesavage,et al.  Context processing in older adults: evidence for a theory relating cognitive control to neurobiology in healthy aging. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[46]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[47]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[48]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  E. Koechlin,et al.  Dissociating the role of the medial and lateral anterior prefrontal cortex in human planning. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  T. Braver,et al.  Cognitive control, goal maintenance, and prefrontal function in healthy aging. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[51]  Benjamin J. Tamber-Rosenau,et al.  Avoiding non-independence in fMRI data analysis: Leave one subject out , 2010, NeuroImage.