What is next for pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research in Asia?

OBJECTIVES Pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research have the potential for rapid adoption in the Asia Pacific region. Nevertheless, the region is characterized by great diversity in social and economic development, ethnicity, population size, health-care system, culture, language, and religion. Thus, the rate of adoption is also quite diverse across the region. METHODS Among the countries reviewed in this article, governments take varying levels of interest in applying this research in health policy decisions. For example, some countries have already implemented systems that require pharmacoeconomic studies as one component of a new pharmaceutical product's approval for reimbursement, whereas others recommend such data but do not require it in policy and medical decision making. The literature in the countries reviewed is actually quite robust given the early stages of development of this field in most countries. The academic community has members trained in this field of research in all the countries reviewed and some universities have established departments whereas others have just introduced a few classes in the area. RESULTS At the moment, pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research are being conducted mainly by academics. In addition, some pharmaceutical researchers are active and pharmaceutical companies are currently preparing to conduct more of this research as part of their strategy for Asian drug development. CONCLUSIONS Prospects for future growth and development in this field are quite good in Asia as rapid healthcare inflation, increasing rates of chronic conditions and aging population, and increasing technology diffusion will underpin the need for greater awareness of the need to incorporate economic efficiency into the health-care systems.

[1]  J. Thumboo,et al.  Validity and reliability of the EQ-5D self-report questionnaire in English-speaking Asian patients with rheumatic diseases in Singapore , 2003, Quality of Life Research.

[2]  J. Sung,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of high-dose omeprazole infusion as adjuvant therapy to endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer. , 2003, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[3]  R. Fogel FORECASTING THE DEMAND FOR HEALTH CARE IN OECD NATIONS AND CHINA , 2003 .

[4]  Xiaodong Wu,et al.  URBANIZATION AND HEALTH CARE IN RURAL CHINA , 2003 .

[5]  F. Chan,et al.  Arthritis treatment in Hong Kong — cost analysis of celecoxib versus conventional NSAIDS, with or without gastroprotective agents , 2002, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[6]  Tetsuji Yamada,et al.  Equity in health care access to: assessing the urban health insurance reform in China. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[7]  O. Chay,et al.  PRA16 CULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF CHILDHOOD ASTHMA QUESTIONNAIRE VERSION B (CAQ-B) FOR SINGAPORE CHILDREN , 2002 .

[8]  Shu-chuen Li,et al.  PHP15: A SURVEY OF PUBLIC HOSPITAL PHARMACISTS IN SINGAPORE ON THEIR VIEWS ABOUT ‘THE FORMULARY’ AND ITS DECISION-MAKING PROCESS , 2001 .

[9]  S. Ho,et al.  PAO5: COST ANALYSIS OF CELECOXIB AND CONVENTIONAL NSAIDS WITH OR WITHOUT GASTROPROTECTIVE AGENTS FOR TREATMENT OF OSTEOARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS , 2001 .

[10]  Chien-Jen Chen,et al.  Persistent hyperendemicity of hepatitis C virus infection in Taiwan: The important role of iatrogenic risk factors , 2001, Journal of medical virology.

[11]  J. You,et al.  Economic analysis of four triple regimens for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori‐related peptic ulcer disease in in‐patient and out‐patient settings in Hong Kong , 2001, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[12]  S. Paik,et al.  Economic evaluation of the societal costs of hepatitis B in South Korea , 2001, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.

[13]  Keiko Nakamura,et al.  A Survey of the Conditions on Pharmacoeconomic Studies at the Pharmaceutical Companies in Japan , 2001 .

[14]  Leow Bee Geok Advance data release , 2001 .

[15]  F. Pang,et al.  PDH18: ENTER THE DRAGON: PHARMACOECONOMICS IN ASIA , 2000 .

[16]  S. Ho,et al.  GI2: COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF HIGH DOSE IV OMEPRAZOLE INFUSION AS ADJUVANT THERAPY TO ENDOSCOPIC HAEMOSTASIS FOR BLEEDING PEPTIC ULCERS , 1999 .

[17]  N Ikegami,et al.  Health care reform in Japan: the virtues of muddling through. , 1999, Health affairs.

[18]  J. Campbell,et al.  The Art of Balance in Health Policy: The Egalitarian Health Insurance System , 1998 .

[19]  N. Ikegami,et al.  Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation in Japanese Pharmaceutical Companies , 1998 .

[20]  J. Campbell,et al.  Containing Health Care Costs in Japan , 1997 .

[21]  H. Banta Health care technology and its assessment in eight countries , 1995 .

[22]  J. Habbema,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Breast Cancer Screening , 1993 .

[23]  M. Powell,et al.  Health care in Japan , 1990 .

[24]  K. Goto Health care in Japan. , 1988, Minnesota medicine.

[25]  Y. Chiang,et al.  Hepatitis B virus infection in Taiwan with reference to anti-HBc versus HBsAg and anti-HBs. , 1980, Taiwan yi xue hui za zhi. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association.

[26]  J. Paxton Republic of Singapore , 1969 .

[27]  G. Shapiro,et al.  The management of asthma. , 1981, Scottish medical journal.