An Adjusted Weight Metric to Quantify Flexibility Available in Conventional Generators for Low Carbon Power Systems

With the increasing shares of intermittent renewable sources in the grid, it becomes increasingly essential to quantify the requirements of the power systems flexibility. In this article, an adjusted weight flexibility metric (AWFM) is developed to quantify the available flexibility within individual generators as well as within the overall system. The developed metric is useful for power system operators who require a fast, simple, and offline metric. This provides a more realistic and accurate quantification of the available technical flexibility without performing time-consuming multi-temporal simulations. Another interesting feature is that it can be used to facilitate scenario comparisons. This is achieved by developing a new framework to assure the consistency of the metric and by proposing a new adjusted weighting mechanism based on correlation analysis and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). A new ranking approach based on flexibility was also proposed to increase the share of the renewable energy sources (RESs). The proposed framework was tested on the IEEE RTS-96 test-system. The results demonstrate the consistency of the AWFM. Moreover, the results show that the proposed metric is adaptive as it automatically adjusts the flexibility index with the addition or removal of generators. The new ranking approach proved its ability to increase the wind share from 28% to 37.2% within the test system. The AWFM can be a valuable contribution to the field of flexibility for its ability to provide systematic formulation for the precise analysis and accurate assessment of inherent technical flexibility for a low carbon power system.

[1]  Luis F. Ochoa,et al.  Evaluating and planning flexibility in sustainable power systems , 2013, 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[2]  Pierluigi Siano,et al.  Flexibility in future power systems with high renewable penetration: A review , 2016 .

[3]  Peter Lund,et al.  Modeling flexibility and optimal use of existing power plants with large-scale variable renewable power schemes , 2016 .

[4]  Markus Lauer,et al.  Flexible power generation scenarios for biogas plants operated in Germany: impacts on economic viability and GHG emissions , 2017 .

[5]  S. M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Effects of ramp-rate limits on unit commitment and economic dispatch , 1993 .

[6]  Bernd Möller,et al.  The importance of flexible power plant operation for Jiangsu's wind integration , 2012 .

[7]  Thomas Hamacher,et al.  Integration of wind and solar power in Europe: Assessment of flexibility requirements , 2014 .

[8]  Damian Flynn,et al.  Transmission, Variable Generation, and Power System Flexibility , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  C. Batlle,et al.  Impacts of Intermittent Renewables on Electricity Generation System Operation , 2012 .

[10]  Machteld van den Broek,et al.  Least-cost options for integrating intermittent renewables in low-carbon power systems , 2016 .

[11]  Paul Denholm,et al.  Grid flexibility and storage required to achieve very high penetration of variable renewable electricity , 2011 .

[12]  Reza S. Abhari,et al.  Effect of increased renewables generation on operation of thermal power plants , 2016 .

[13]  Erik Ela,et al.  Wholesale electricity market design with increasing levels of renewable generation: Incentivizing flexibility in system operations , 2016 .

[14]  Mohd Wazir Mustafa,et al.  Recent approaches of unit commitment in the presence of intermittent renewable energy resources: A review , 2017 .

[15]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  The IEEE Reliability Test System-1996. A report prepared by the Reliability Test System Task Force of the Application of Probability Methods Subcommittee , 1999 .

[16]  William D'haeseleer,et al.  The actual effect of wind power on overall electricity generation costs and CO2 emissions , 2009 .

[17]  Francois Bouffard,et al.  Reconstructing Operating Reserve: Flexibility for Sustainable Power Systems , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[18]  Ronnie Belmans,et al.  Revision of reserve requirements following wind power integration in island power systems , 2013 .

[19]  Donghan Feng,et al.  A security‐constrained flexible demand scheduling strategy for wind power accommodation , 2016 .

[20]  Le Xie,et al.  A Metric and Market Construct of Inter-Temporal Flexibility in Time-Coupled Economic Dispatch , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  Ali Esmaeel Nezhad,et al.  Mixed‐integer nonlinear programming framework for combined heat and power units with nonconvex feasible operating region: Feasibility, optimality, and flexibility evaluation , 2019 .

[22]  E. Lannoye,et al.  Evaluation of Power System Flexibility , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[23]  Machteld van den Broek,et al.  Operational flexibility and economics of power plants in future low-carbon power systems , 2015 .

[24]  Guisheng Wang,et al.  Probabilistic modeling of renewable energy source based on Spark platform with large-scale sample data , 2018, International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems.

[25]  Mohd Wazir Mustafa,et al.  Harnessing flexibility potential of flexible carbon capture power plants for future low carbon power systems: Review , 2018 .

[26]  S. Z. Sayed Hassen,et al.  A composite metric for assessing flexibility available in conventional generators of power systems , 2016 .

[27]  E.A. DeMeo,et al.  Utility Wind Integration and Operating Impact State of the Art , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[28]  Robert Anderson,et al.  Grid flexibility: The quiet revolution , 2017 .

[29]  R. W. Saaty,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used , 1987 .

[30]  Janet F. Barlow,et al.  Increasing thermal plant flexibility in a high renewables power system , 2015 .