Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system

Wikipedia is often considered as an example of ‘collaborative knowledge’. Researchers have contested the value of Wikipedia content on various accounts. Some have disputed the ability of anonymous amateurs to produce quality information, while others have contested Wikipedia’s claim to accuracy and neutrality. Even if these concerns about Wikipedia as an encyclopaedic genre are relevant, they misguidedly focus on human agents only. Wikipedia’s advance is not only enabled by its human resources, but is equally defined by the technological tools and managerial dynamics that structure and maintain its content. This article analyses the sociotechnical system — the intricate collaboration between human users and automated content agents — that defines Wikipedia as a knowledge instrument.

[1]  Rishab Aiyer Ghosh,et al.  The Orbiten Free Software Survey , 2000, First Monday.

[2]  R. Rosenzweig.  Can History Be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past , 2006 .

[3]  J. Zittrain.  The Future of the Internet , 2008 .

[4]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in wikipedia: quality through coordination , 2008, CSCW.

[5]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything , 2006 .

[6]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Cultural Differences in Collaborative Authoring of Wikipedia , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[7]  Stuart Hannabuss,et al.  The Big Switch: Rewiring the World, from Edison to Google , 2009 .

[8]  B. Latour.  Technology is Society Made Durable , 1990 .

[9]  Felix Stalder,et al.  Open Source Intelligence , 2002, First Monday.

[10]  Thomas Chesney,et al.  An empirical examination of Wikipedia's credibility , 2006, First Monday.

[11]  John Domingue,et al.  The Future of the Internet , 1999, Academia Letters.

[12]  J. Law.  A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[13]  M. Ruffin.  On being digital. , 1995, Physician executive.

[14]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  Wikipedia risks , 2005, CACM.

[15]  Clay Shirky.  Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations , 2008 .

[16]  Richard A. Rogers,et al.  The End of the Virtual , 2009 .

[17]  James Surowiecki.  The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations Doubleday Books. , 2004 .

[18]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom , 2006 .

[19]  J. Giles.  Internet encyclopaedias go head to head , 2005, Nature.

[20]  Philip Barker,et al.  Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From Production to Produsage , 2009 .

[21]  Alexander Galloway,et al.  Protocol, or, How Control Exists after Decentralization , 2001 .

[22]  C. Sunstein.  Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge , 2006 .

[23]  David Beer,et al.  Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious , 2009, New Media Soc..

[24]  P. D. Magnus,et al.  Early Response to False Claims in Wikipedia , 2008, First Monday.

[25]  Bryan A. Pendleton,et al.  Power of the Few vs. Wisdom of the Crowd: Wikipedia and the Rise of the Bourgeoisie , 2006 .

[26]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Taking up the mop: identifying future wikipedia administrators , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[27]  Luca de Alfaro,et al.  Measuring author contributions to the Wikipedia , 2008, Int. Sym. Wikis.

[28]  Derek Lackaff,et al.  An Analysis of Topical Coverage of Wikipedia , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..