Evidence of a general 2/3-power law of scaling leaf nitrogen to phosphorus among major plant groups and biomes

Scaling relations among plant traits are both cause and consequence of processes at organ-to-ecosystem scales. The relationship between leaf nitrogen and phosphorus is of particular interest, as both elements are essential for plant metabolism; their limited availabilities often constrain plant growth, and general relations between the two have been documented. Herein, we use a comprehensive dataset of more than 9300 observations of approximately 2500 species from 70 countries to examine the scaling of leaf nitrogen to phosphorus within and across taxonomical groups and biomes. Power law exponents derived from log–log scaling relations were near 2/3 for all observations pooled, for angiosperms and gymnosperms globally, and for angiosperms grouped by biomes, major functional groups, orders or families. The uniform 2/3 scaling of leaf nitrogen to leaf phosphorus exists along a parallel continuum of rising nitrogen, phosphorus, specific leaf area, photosynthesis and growth, as predicted by stoichiometric theory which posits that plants with high growth rates require both high allocation of phosphorus-rich RNA and a high metabolic rate to support the energy demands of macromolecular synthesis. The generality of this finding supports the view that this stoichiometric scaling relationship and the mechanisms that underpin it are foundational components of the living world. Additionally, although abundant variance exists within broad constraints, these results also support the idea that surprisingly simple rules regulate leaf form and function in terrestrial ecosystems.

[1]  K. Niklas,et al.  Predicting the allometry of leaf surface area and dry mass. , 2009, American journal of botany.

[2]  G. Ågren Stoichiometry and Nutrition of Plant Growth in Natural Communities , 2008 .

[3]  H. Lambers,et al.  Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  M. Ball,et al.  Testing the growth rate vs. geochemical hypothesis for latitudinal variation in plant nutrients. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[5]  Helmut Hillebrand,et al.  Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[6]  Steven Jansen,et al.  Evolutionary control of leaf element composition in plants. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[7]  Gregory P Asner,et al.  Controls over foliar N:P ratios in tropical rain forests. , 2007, Ecology.

[8]  William F. Fagan,et al.  Phylogenetic and Growth Form Variation in the Scaling of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in the Seed Plants , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[9]  Karl J Niklas,et al.  A phyletic perspective on the allometry of plant biomass-partitioning patterns and functionally equivalent organ-categories. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[10]  M. Westoby,et al.  Bivariate line‐fitting methods for allometry , 2006, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[11]  Dali Guo,et al.  Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[12]  A. Kerkhoff,et al.  Plant allometry, stoichiometry and the temperature-dependence of primary productivity , 2005 .

[13]  K. Niklas,et al.  N, P, and C stoichiometry of Eranthis hyemalis (Ranunculaceae) and the allometry of plant growth. , 2005, American journal of botany.

[14]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Nitrogen/phosphorus leaf stoichiometry and the scaling of plant growth , 2005 .

[15]  P. Reich,et al.  Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[16]  S. Güsewell N : P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance. , 2004, The New phytologist.

[17]  T. Daufresne,et al.  SCALING OF C:N:P STOICHIOMETRY IN FORESTS WORLDWIDE: IMPLICATIONS OF TERRESTRIAL REDFIELD‐TYPE RATIOS , 2004 .

[18]  P. Reich,et al.  Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[20]  G. Ågren The C:N:P stoichiometry of autotrophs: Theory and observations , 2004 .

[21]  J. Elser,et al.  Growth rate–stoichiometry couplings in diverse biota , 2003 .

[22]  Ds Falster (S)MATR : standardised major axis tests and routines. Version 1.0 , 2003 .

[23]  J. Elser,et al.  Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere , 2002 .

[24]  M. Westoby,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES : Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species , 2002 .

[25]  William F. Fagan,et al.  Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems. , 2000 .

[26]  A. Palmer,et al.  Detecting Publication Bias in Meta‐analyses: A Case Study of Fluctuating Asymmetry and Sexual Selection , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[27]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Changing sources of nutrients during four million years of ecosystem development , 1999, Nature.

[28]  P. Reich,et al.  From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  C. Duarte,et al.  Scaling maximum growth rates across photosynthetic organisms , 1996 .

[30]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Inherent Variation in Growth Rate Between Higher Plants: A Search for Physiological Causes and Ecological Consequences , 1992 .

[31]  T. Ingestad,et al.  Nutrition and growth of birch seedlings at varied relative phosphorus addition rates , 1988 .

[32]  Peter M. Vitousek,et al.  Litterfall, Nutrient Cycling, and Nutrient Limitation in Tropical Forests , 1984 .

[33]  J. Syers,et al.  The fate of phosphorus during pedogenesis , 1976 .