Toward understanding the attraction effect: The implications of product stimulus meaningfulness and familiarity.

The attraction effect refers to an inferior product's ability to increase the attractiveness of another alternative when the inferior product is added to a choice set. This article examines potential explanations for the attraction effect and its boundary conditions. The article reports several empirical investigations and suggests that the attraction effect may be moderated by such variables as stimulus meaningfulness and familiarity with the product category. The implications are relevant to research on context effects in consumer choice.

[1]  F. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology , 1932 .

[2]  E. Brunswik.  Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments , 1957 .

[3]  Stevenson Ss,et al.  Adaptation-level vs. the relativity of judgment. , 1958 .

[4]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior , 1959 .

[5]  H. Helson.  Adaptation-level theory : an experimental and systematic approach to behavior , 1964 .

[6]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[7]  K. B. Monroe.  Buyers’ Subjective Perceptions of Price , 1973 .

[8]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice , 1976 .

[9]  C. Whan Park,et al.  The Effect of Individual and Situation-Related Factors on Consumer Selection of Judgmental Models , 1976 .

[10]  R. Luce,et al.  The Choice Axiom after Twenty Years , 1977 .

[11]  Paul E. Green,et al.  On the Analysis of Qualitative Data in Marketing Research , 1977 .

[12]  M. P. Friedman,et al.  HANDBOOK OF PERCEPTION , 1977 .

[13]  P. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook , 1978 .

[14]  W. J. Dixon,et al.  BMDP-77, Biomedical Computer Programs, P-Series , 1979 .

[15]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Multiattribute Approaches for Product Concept Evaluation and Generation: A Critical Review , 1979 .

[16]  J. Bettman.  An information processing theory of consumer choice , 1979 .

[17]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[18]  R. Hogarth,et al.  BEHAVIORAL DECISION THEORY: PROCESSES OF JUDGMENT AND CHOICE , 1981 .

[19]  C. W. Park,et al.  Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics , 1981 .

[20]  Christopher P. Puto,et al.  Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .

[21]  John W. Payne,et al.  Contingent decision behavior. , 1982 .

[22]  Girish N. Punj,et al.  An Interaction Framework of Consumer Decision Making , 1983 .

[23]  Joel Huber,et al.  Market Boundaries and Product Choice: Illustrating Attraction and Substitution Effects , 1983 .

[24]  Meryl P. Gardner,et al.  Advertising Effects on Attributes Recalled and Criteria Used for Brand Evaluations , 1983 .

[25]  J. Wesley Hutchinson,et al.  On the Locus of Range Effects in Judgment and Choice , 1983 .

[26]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  A Customer-oriented Approach for Determining Market Structures , 1984 .

[27]  Judith Lynne Zaichkowsky,et al.  Familiarity: Product Use, Involvement Or Expertise? , 1985 .