Who benefits from virtuality?

Abstract For educational software to take advantage of contemporary views of learning, instructional designers need to employ design models that incorporate the variety of ideas that are based on constructivist frameworks for developing learning environments. These environments, if well designed, can support learner construction of knowledge, however, such frameworks are based upon arguments that learners should be placed in authentic environments that incorporate sophisticated representations of context through such constructs as “virtual worlds”. Within these environments the learner is supported by visual metaphors constructed to represent the information structure and how the “world” operates. This paper will discuss the framework employed in the development of several virtual solutions and the process by which they were constructed.

[1]  Shirley Alexander,et al.  Virtual Reality in Education: Defining Researchable Issues , 1994 .

[2]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Constructivism: Implications for the Design and Delivery of Instruction , 1996 .

[3]  C. Hirsch.  Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics , 1988 .

[4]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[5]  T. Urdan,et al.  The Role of Context , 1999 .

[6]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Learning with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective , 1998 .

[7]  Mike Schultz,et al.  Exploring the Nardoo , 1997 .

[8]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Situative Versus Cognitive Perspectives: Form Versus Substance , 1997 .

[9]  Thomas M. Duffy,et al.  Problem Based Learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework , 1995 .

[10]  Susan M. Land,et al.  The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments , 1997 .

[11]  Integrated Media: Toward a Theoretical Framework for Utilizing Their Potential , 1993 .

[12]  Peter C. Honebein,et al.  Constructivism and the Design of Learning Environments: Context and Authentic Activities for Learning , 1993 .

[13]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[14]  Cliff McKnight,et al.  HyperText: A Psychological Perspective , 1992 .

[15]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Computer-based microworlds: A bridge between constructivism and direct instruction , 1992 .

[16]  M. Driscoll.  Psychology of Learning for Instruction , 1993 .

[17]  Tom Schuller,et al.  The Changing University , 1995 .

[18]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Handbook of Research for educational Communications and Technology , 1997 .

[19]  Sue E. Berryman,et al.  Designing Effective Learning Environments: Cognitive Apprenticeship Models. , 1991 .

[20]  William Winn,et al.  Designing virtual worlds for use in mathematics education: the example of experimental algebra , 1992 .

[21]  H. Simon,et al.  Situated Learning and Education1 , 1996 .

[22]  D. Jonassen.  Thinking Technology: Toward a Constructivist Design Model , 1994 .

[23]  J. Greeno.  A perspective on thinking. , 1989 .

[24]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Designing Environments for Constructive Learning , 2012, NATO ASI Series.

[25]  Training,et al.  Discipline review of teacher education in mathematics and science , 1989 .

[26]  Czeslaw Jan Grycz,et al.  The textbook of the future , 1996 .

[27]  Rita C. Richey,et al.  The role of context in learning and instructional design , 1997 .

[28]  Barry Harper,et al.  Learner Construction of Knowledge: Using StageStruck to Develop a Performance , 1998 .

[29]  John G. Hedberg,et al.  Supporting ill-structured problem solving in interactive multimedia learning environments , 1998 .

[30]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Engines for Education , 1995 .

[31]  Joanna C. Dunlap,et al.  Rich environments for active learning: a definition , 1995 .