Natural regeneration and biodiversity: a global meta‐analysis and implications for spatial planning

Natural regeneration offers a cheaper alternative to active reforestation and has the potential to become the predominant way of restoring degraded tropical landscapes at large‐scale. We conducted a meta‐analysis for tropical regions and quantified the relationships between both ecological and socioeconomic factors and biodiversity responses in naturally regenerating areas. Biogeographic realms, past disturbance, and the human development index (HDI) were used as explanatory variables for biodiversity responses. In addition, we present a case study of large‐scale natural regeneration in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest and identify areas where different forms of restoration would be most suitable. Using our dataset for tropical regions, we showed that natural regeneration was predominantly reported within: the Neotropical realm; areas that were intensively disturbed; and countries with medium HDI. We also found that biodiversity in regenerating forests was more similar to the values found in old growth forests in: countries with either low, high, or very high HDI; less biodiverse realms; and areas of less intensive past disturbance. Our case study from Brazil showed that the level of forest gain resulting from environmental legislation, in particular the Brazilian Forest Code, has been reduced, but remains substantial. Complementary market incentives and financial mechanisms to promote large‐scale natural regeneration in human‐modified agricultural landscapes are also needed. Our analysis provides insights into the factors that promote or limit the recovery of biodiversity in naturally regenerating areas, and aids to identify areas with higher potential for natural regeneration.

[1]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  The R book , 2022 .

[2]  Manuel R. Guariguata,et al.  Natural regeneration as a tool for large‐scale forest restoration in the tropics: prospects and challenges , 2016 .

[3]  Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues,et al.  Balancing economic costs and ecological outcomes of passive and active restoration in agricultural landscapes: the case of Brazil , 2016 .

[4]  M. Curran,et al.  Forest restoration: a global dataset for biodiversity and vegetation structure. , 2016, Ecology.

[5]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  A global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of forest restoration success , 2016, Nature Communications.

[6]  M. Curran,et al.  Which landscape size best predicts the influence of forest cover on restoration success? A global meta‐analysis on the scale of effect , 2016 .

[7]  Letícia Couto Garcia,et al.  A critical analysis of the Native Vegetation Protection Law of Brazil (2012): updates and ongoing initiatives , 2016 .

[8]  Susan G. Letcher,et al.  Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests , 2016, Nature.

[9]  Bernardo B. N. Strassburg,et al.  How can higher-yield farming help to spare nature? , 2016, Science.

[10]  P. Brancalion,et al.  Functional composition trajectory: a resolution to the debate between Suganuma, Durigan, and Reid , 2016 .

[11]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Incorporating habitat availability into systematic planning for restoration: a species‐specific approach for Atlantic Forest mammals , 2015 .

[12]  A. Uezu,et al.  Atlantic Forest spontaneous regeneration at landscape scale , 2015, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[13]  David Kenfack,et al.  An estimate of the number of tropical tree species , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Bernardo B. N. Strassburg,et al.  Creating space for large-scale restoration in tropical agricultural landscapes , 2015 .

[15]  Ben Collen,et al.  Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity , 2015, Nature.

[16]  M. Garbin,et al.  8. Restoration Success Of Tropical Forests: The Search For Indicators , 2015 .

[17]  L. G. Barioni,et al.  When enough should be enough: Improving the use of current agricultural lands could meet production demands and spare natural habitats in Brazil , 2014 .

[18]  J. Metzger,et al.  Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspot , 2014, Science.

[19]  Eric Armijo,et al.  Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains , 2014, Science.

[20]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy? , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[21]  R. Chazdon Second growth : the promise of tropical forest regeneration in an age of deforestation , 2014 .

[22]  K. Willis,et al.  Recovery and resilience of tropical forests after disturbance , 2014, Nature Communications.

[23]  B. Soares-Filho,et al.  Cracking Brazil's Forest Code , 2014, Science.

[24]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Restoration challenges and opportunities for increasing landscape connectivity under the new Brazilian Forest Act , 2013 .

[25]  J. Aronson,et al.  Priority setting for scaling-up tropical forest restoration projects: Early lessons from the Atlantic Forest Restoration Pact , 2013 .

[26]  Michael James Howes,et al.  Evaluating Ecological Restoration Success: A Review of the Literature , 2013 .

[27]  M. Clark,et al.  Deforestation and Reforestation of Latin America and the Caribbean (2001–2010) , 2013 .

[28]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Global Forest Transition: Prospects for an End to Deforestation , 2011 .

[29]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity , 2011, Nature.

[30]  James Aronson,et al.  Large-scale ecological restoration of high-diversity tropical forests in SE Brazil , 2011 .

[31]  Karen D. Holl,et al.  When and where to actively restore ecosystems , 2011 .

[32]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Ivette Perfecto,et al.  The agroecological matrix as alternative to the land-sparing/agriculture intensification model , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  D. Dent,et al.  The future of tropical species in secondary forests: A quantitative review , 2009 .

[35]  Luis García-Barrios,et al.  Neotropical Forest Conservation, Agricultural Intensification, and Rural Out-Migration: The Mexican Experience , 2009 .

[36]  A. Newton,et al.  Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis , 2009, Science.

[37]  Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues,et al.  On the restoration of high diversity forests: 30 years of experience in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. , 2009 .

[38]  H. Grau,et al.  Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on The influence of human demography and agriculture on natural systems in the Neotropics Globalization and Land-Use Transitions in Latin America , 2008 .

[39]  D. Liebsch,et al.  How long does the Atlantic Rain Forest take to recover after a disturbance? Changes in species composition and ecological features during secondary succession , 2008 .

[40]  Ç. Şekercioğlu,et al.  Landscape constraints on functional diversity of birds and insects in tropical agroecosystems. , 2008, Ecology.

[41]  Richard J Hobbs,et al.  What's new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[42]  Clive A. McAlpine,et al.  Regrowth forests on abandoned agricultural land: A review of their habitat values for recovering forest fauna , 2007 .

[43]  Ivette Perfecto,et al.  Can organic agriculture feed the world? , 2007, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

[44]  Susan G. Letcher,et al.  Rates of change in tree communities of secondary Neotropical forests following major disturbances , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  B. Wuethrich Reconstructing Brazil's Atlantic Rainforest , 2007, Science.

[46]  S. Wunder The Efficiency of Payments for Environmental Services in Tropical Conservation , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[47]  K. Holl,et al.  Tropical dry-forest regeneration from root suckers in Central Brazil , 2006, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[48]  P. Erskine,et al.  Restoration of Degraded Tropical Forest Landscapes , 2005, Science.

[49]  T. Mitchell Aide,et al.  Restoration Success: How Is It Being Measured? , 2005 .

[50]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change , 2005 .

[51]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Why Do Some Tropical Forests Have So Many Species of Trees , 2004 .

[52]  P. Legendre,et al.  FACTORS AFFECTING COMMUNITY COMPOSITION OF FOREST REGENERATION IN DEFORESTED, ABANDONED LAND IN PANAMA , 2004 .

[53]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Why Do Some Tropical Forests Have So Many Species of Trees? , 2004 .

[54]  J. Sayer,et al.  The restoration of forest biodiversity and ecological values , 2004 .

[55]  T. Aide,et al.  Globalization, Migration, and Latin American Ecosystems , 2004, Science.

[56]  Soumyananda Dinda Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey , 2004 .

[57]  R. Dunn Recovery of Faunal Communities During Tropical Forest Regeneration , 2004 .

[58]  G. Powell,et al.  Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth , 2001 .

[59]  Manuel R. Guariguata,et al.  Neotropical secondary forest succession : changes in structural and functional characteristics , 2001 .

[60]  Michael D. Hammig,et al.  Institutions and the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Deforestation: A Crosscountry Analysis for Latin America, Africa and Asia , 2001 .

[61]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  THE META‐ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE RATIOS IN EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY , 1999 .

[62]  J. Cairns,et al.  RESTORATION ECOLOGY : The State of an Emerging Field , 1998 .

[63]  L. Janishevski,et al.  Ecosystem restoration, protected areas and biodiversity conservation , 2015 .

[64]  J. Królczyk,et al.  Sustainable Agriculture - the Potential to Increase Wheat and Rapeseed Yields in Poland , 2014 .

[65]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[66]  J. Torezan,et al.  Woody Species Regeneration in Atlantic Forest Restoration Sites Depends on Surrounding Landscape , 2013 .

[67]  R. R. Rodrigues,et al.  Finding the money for tropical forest restoration , 2012 .

[68]  L. Guimarães,et al.  Can Forest Carbon Finance Influence Land Tenure Security in Project Areas? Preliminary Lessons from Projects in Niger and Kenya , 2011 .

[69]  C. Godfray,et al.  The Future of Food and Farming: Challenges and Choices for Global Sustainability , 2011 .

[70]  P. Nair,et al.  Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems : opportunities and challenges , 2011 .

[71]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Frontiers inEcology and the Environment Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming ? , 2007 .

[72]  B. Wuethrich Biodiversity. Reconstructing Brazil's Atlantic rainforest. , 2007, Science.

[73]  F. A. Bazzaz,et al.  The Response of Natural Ecosystems to the Rising Global CO2 Levels , 1990 .