USING NETWORK ANALYSIS TO CHARACTERIZE FOREST STRUCTURE

Network analysis quantifies different structural properties of systems of interrelated parts using a single analytical framework. Many ecological phenomena have network-like properties, such as the trophic relationships of food webs, geographic structure of metapopulations, and species interactions in communities. Therefore, our ability to understand and manage such systems may benefit from the use of network-analysis techniques. But network analysis has not been applied extensively to ecological problems, and its suitability for ecological studies is uncertain. Here, we investigate the ability of network analysis to detect spatial patterns of species association in a tropical forest. We use three common graph-theoretic measures of network structure to quantify the effect of understory tree size on the spatial association of understory species with trees in the canopy: the node degree distribution (NDD), characteristic path length (CPL), and clustering coefficient (CC). We compute the NDD, CPL, and CC for each of seven size classes of understory trees. For significance testing, we compare the observed values to frequency distributions of each statistic computed from randomized data. We find that the ability of network analysis to distinguish observed patterns from those representing randomized data strongly depends on which aspects of structure are investigated. Analysis of NDD finds no significant difference between random and observed networks. However, analysis of CPL and CC detected nonrandom patterns in three and one of the seven size classes, respectively. Network analysis is a very flexible approach that holds promise for ecological studies, but more research is needed to better understand its advantages and limitations.

[1]  James H. Brown,et al.  Allometric scaling of plant energetics and population density , 1998, Nature.

[2]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[3]  Frank Harary,et al.  Graph Theory , 2016 .

[4]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Diameter, Height, Crown, and Age Relationship in Eight Neotropical Tree Species , 1995 .

[5]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Two degrees of separation in complex food webs , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  Community food webs have scale-invariant structure , 1984, Nature.

[7]  D. Janzen Herbivores and the Number of Tree Species in Tropical Forests , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[8]  D. Fell,et al.  The small world of metabolism , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  Mark Dale,et al.  Graph theoretical methods for comparing phytosociological structures , 1985, Vegetatio.

[10]  Richard T. T. Forman,et al.  Landscape graphs: Ecological modeling with graph theory to detect configurations common to diverse landscapes , 1993, Landscape Ecology.

[11]  J. Gross,et al.  Graph Theory and Its Applications , 1998 .

[12]  M. Dale,et al.  Scales of segregation and aggregation of plants of different kinds , 1994 .

[13]  J. Connell Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. , 1978, Science.

[14]  Mark R. T. Dale,et al.  Spatial Pattern Analysis in Plant Ecology: Spatial Pattern Analysis in Plant Ecology , 1999 .

[15]  P. Legendre Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[16]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Simple rules yield complex food webs , 2000, Nature.

[17]  James H. Brown,et al.  A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems , 1999, Nature.

[18]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  A Stochastic Theory of Community Food Webs. V. Intervality and Triangulation in the Trophic-Niche Overlap Graph , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[19]  L. Webb,et al.  Compensatory Recruitment, Growth, and Mortality as Factors Maintaining Rain Forest Tree Diversity , 1984 .

[20]  Kojima Structure and function , 2005 .

[21]  S. Strogatz Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[22]  S. Pimm The complexity and stability of ecosystems , 1984, Nature.

[23]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  A stochastic theory of community food webs. III. Predicted and observed lengths of food chains , 1986, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[24]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  Individual-based modeling and ecology , 2005 .

[25]  K. Yoda,et al.  Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions (Intraspecific competition among higher plants. XI) , 1963 .

[26]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  How to reconstruct a large genetic network from n gene perturbations in fewer than n2 easy steps , 2001, Bioinform..

[27]  John A. Helms,et al.  Principles of Silviculture , 1979 .

[28]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  A Reevaluation of the ‐3/2 Power Rule of Plant Self‐Thinning , 1987 .

[29]  K J Niklas,et al.  Invariant scaling relationships for interspecific plant biomass production rates and body size , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Scale-free characteristics of random networks: the topology of the world-wide web , 2000 .

[31]  Jan Lepš,et al.  Spatial dynamics of forest decline: the role of neighbouring trees , 1996 .

[32]  James H. Brown,et al.  Allometric scaling of production and life-history variation in vascular plants , 1999, Nature.

[33]  R. Albert,et al.  The large-scale organization of metabolic networks , 2000, Nature.

[34]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[35]  Shimon Even,et al.  Graph Algorithms , 1979 .

[36]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[37]  Graham Russell,et al.  Plant Canopies: Their Growth, Form and Function: Modules, models and meristems in plant architecture , 1989 .

[38]  J. Lawton,et al.  Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to the richness of ecological communities : a theoretical perspective , 1992 .

[39]  James White,et al.  The allometric interpretation of the self-thinning rule , 1981 .

[40]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Invariant scaling relations across tree-dominated communities , 2001, Nature.

[41]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Internet: Diameter of the World-Wide Web , 1999, Nature.

[42]  John Scott Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[43]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  A. Gibbons Algorithmic Graph Theory , 1985 .

[45]  N. Kenkel,et al.  A long‐term study of Pinus banksiana population dynamics , 1997 .

[46]  B. Ripley The Second-Order Analysis of Stationary Point Processes , 1976 .

[47]  T. Bailey Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists , 2006 .

[48]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[49]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Universal scaling relations in food webs , 2003, Nature.

[50]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Local neighborhood effects on long-term survival of individual trees in a neotropical forest , 2001, Ecological Research.

[51]  Kurt Mehlhorn,et al.  LEDA: a platform for combinatorial and geometric computing , 1997, CACM.

[52]  Ronald J. Gould,et al.  Graph theory , 1988 .

[53]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  A Stochastic Theory of Community Food Webs , 1990 .

[54]  Mark Dale,et al.  Graph theoretical analysis of the phytosociological structure of plant communities: The theoretical basis , 1997, Vegetatio.