BackgroundMorbid obesity accounts for more than 90,000 deaths per year in the United States. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is the second most common weight loss procedure performed in the US and the most common in Europe and Australia. Simulation in surgical training is a rapidly advancing field that has been adopted by many to prepare surgeons for surgical techniques and procedures. The aim of our study was to determine face, construct, and content validity for a novel virtual reality laparoscopic adjustable gastric band simulator.MethodsTwenty-eight subjects were categorized into two groups (expert and novice), determined by their skill level in laparoscopic surgery. Experts consisted of subjects who had at least 4 years of laparoscopic training and operative experience. Novices consisted of subjects with medical training but with less than 4 years of laparoscopic training. The subjects used the virtual reality laparoscopic adjustable band surgery simulator. They were automatically scored according to various tasks. The subjects then completed a questionnaire to evaluate face and content validity.ResultsOn a 5-point Likert scale (1 = lowest score, 5 = highest score), the mean score for visual realism was 4.00 ± 0.67 and the mean score for realism of the interface and tool movements was 4.07 ± 0.77 (face validity). There were significant differences in the performances of the two subject groups (expert and novice) based on total scores (p < 0.001) (construct validity). Mean score for utility of the simulator, as addressed by the expert group, was 4.50 ± 0.71 (content validity).ConclusionWe created a virtual reality laparoscopic adjustable gastric band simulator. Our initial results demonstrate excellent face, construct, and content validity findings. To our knowledge, this is the first virtual reality simulator with haptic feedback for training residents and surgeons in the laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding procedure.
[1]
M. Schijven,et al.
Construct validity of the LapSim: Can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts?
,
2007,
Surgical Endoscopy.
[2]
Anthony G. Gallagher,et al.
Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced and novice flexible endoscopists with a virtual reality simulator.
,
2003
.
[3]
R. Likert.
“Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A”
,
2022,
The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.
[4]
Suvranu De,et al.
Using the PhysX engine for physics‐based virtual surgery with force feedback
,
2009,
The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.
[5]
Edgar Erdfelder,et al.
G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences
,
2007,
Behavior research methods.
[6]
J. Duncombe,et al.
Clinical and Radiological Follow-up of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Bands, 1998 and 2000: A Comparison of Two Techniques
,
2005,
Obesity surgery.
[7]
G. Fielding,et al.
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: surgical technique.
,
2003,
Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.
[8]
G. Fried,et al.
Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills.
,
1998,
American journal of surgery.
[9]
Elspeth M McDougall,et al.
Validation of surgical simulators.
,
2007,
Journal of endourology.