Changing the Perspective: Using a Cognitive Model to Improve thinkLets for Ideation

In the field of collaboration engineering, thinkLets describe reusable and transferable collaborative activities to reproduce known patterns of collaboration. This paper focuses on thinkLets of the pattern Generate, which define collaboration activities to produce and share new contributions by a group. We address the question whether the small number of published Generate thinkLets can adequately represent the various approaches contained in published idea generation techniques. We used a cognitive model to analyze 101 idea generation techniques with regard to the underlying mental principles that stimulate the ideation process by deliberately activating larger areas of the knowledge network. We present three changes of perspective based on these principles, which can be used to formalize the underlying mechanisms of idea generation techniques. The paper shows how these three principles can be used to improve Generate thinkLets and discusses how this formalization can improve the applicability of information systems for ideation processes.

[1]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  ThinkLets: a collaboration engineering pattern language , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol..

[2]  Arthur B. VanGundy,et al.  Techniques of structured problem solving , 1981 .

[3]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[4]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Causal Relationships in Creative Problem Solving: Comparing Facilitation Interventions for Ideation , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Relative accessibility of domain knowledge and creativity: The effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas , 2007 .

[6]  Graham Horton Idea Engineering : Teaching Students how to Generate Ideas , 2006 .

[7]  J. Valacich,et al.  Idea Generation in Computer-Based Groups: A New Ending to an Old Story , 1994 .

[8]  Gwendolyn L. Kolfschoten,et al.  Reconceptualizing Generate thinkLets: the Role of the Modifier , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[9]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Analogy and creativity in the works of Johannes Kepler , 1997 .

[10]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  The cognitive network model of creativity: a new causal model of creativity and a new brainstorming technique , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  Monica J. Garfield,et al.  Modifying Paradigms: Individual Differences, Creativity Techniques and Exposure to Ideas in Group Idea Generation , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Arthur B. VanGundy,et al.  101 Activities for Teaching Creativity and Problem Solving , 2004 .

[13]  Steven M. Smith The constraining effects of initial ideas. , 2003 .

[14]  Idea Generation Techniques among Creative Professionals , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[15]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: Exposure effects in an idea generation task , 2002 .

[16]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Collaboration Engineering with ThinkLets to Pursue Sustained Success with Group Support Systems , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Wolfgang Stroebe,et al.  How the Group Affects the Mind: A Cognitive Model of Idea Generation in Groups , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[18]  A. Osborn Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking , 1953 .

[19]  James M. Higgins 101 Creative Problem Solving Techniques: The Handbook of New Ideas for Business , 1994 .

[20]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Research in creativity and GSS , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[21]  B. Hennessey The Social Psychology of Creativity , 2003, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[22]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  New Products: The Key Factors in Success , 1990 .

[23]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Group Support Systems: A Descriptive Evaluation of Case and Field Studies , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[25]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Defining Key Concepts for Collaboration Engineering , 2006, AMCIS.

[26]  T. Lubart Models of the Creative Process: Past, Present and Future , 2001 .

[27]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[28]  Hans Welling,et al.  Four Mental Operations in Creative Cognition: The Importance of Abstraction , 2007 .

[29]  Gwendolyn L. Kolfschoten,et al.  A Design Approach for Collaboration Processes: A Multimethod Design Science Study in Collaboration Engineering , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Gerald F. Smith Idea‐Generation Techniques: A Formulary of Active Ingredients , 1998 .

[31]  S. Mednick The associative basis of the creative process. , 1962, Psychological review.

[32]  Stefan Werner Knoll,et al.  The Impact of Stimuli Characteristics on the Ideation Process: An Evaluation of the Change of Perspective 'Analogy' , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[33]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Collaboration Engineering: Designing Repeatable Processes for High-Value Collaborative Tasks , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[34]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Electronic brainstorming: Theory, research, and future directions. , 2003 .

[35]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Search of associative memory. , 1981 .

[36]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1996 .

[37]  Carol A. Manning,et al.  An evaluation of human act generation performance , 1987 .

[38]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Facilitating Group Creativity: Experience with a Group Decision Support System , 1987, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Structuring Time and Task in Electronic Brainstorming , 1999, MIS Q..

[40]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Process analytic models of creative capacities , 1991 .

[41]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Fifteen years of GSS in the field: a comparison across time and national boundaries , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[42]  Eamonn O'Neill,et al.  Understanding design as a social creative process , 2005, C&C '05.

[43]  R. Cooper Predevelopment activities determine new product success , 1988 .

[44]  Michael Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. , 1991 .

[45]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  An Examination of the Impact of Stimuli Type and GSS Structure on Creativity: Brainstorming Versus Non-Brainstorming Techniques in a GSS Environment , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[47]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  A conceptual foundation of the thinkLet concept for Collaboration Engineering , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[48]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Improving group creativity: brainstorming versus non-brainstorming techniques in a GSS environment , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[49]  J. Valacich,et al.  Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. , 1993 .