Measurement system design for damage detection using model-free data interpretation methods

Designing a measurement system is usually performed using only engineering judgment and experience. Thus, it may result in either a large amount of redundant data or insufficient data leading to ambiguous results. This paper presents a systematic approach to design measurement systems for damage detection using model-free data-interpretation methods. The approach provides decision support for two tasks: (1) determining the appropriate number of sensors and (2) placing these sensors in the most informative locations. These tasks correspond to two steps. The first step is to evaluate the performance of measurement systems in terms of the increasing numbers of sensors. Engineers can then determine the number of sensors to be used at the point where the improvement of the performance is modest with the addition of more sensors. The second step is to configure measurement systems in order to place the sensors at the most informative locations. This step involves evaluating the performance of measurement configurations using three criteria: minimizing the number of non-detectable scenarios, minimizing the average time to detection and maximizing the average damage detectability. The result obtained from three-objective optimization is a set of non-dominated solutions. Thus, to choose the best compromise solution, a multi-criteria decision-making strategy is employed. A railway truss bridge in Zangenberg (Germany) is used to illustrate the applicability of the approach. Measurement systems are designed to monitor the bridge where measurement data are interpreted using two model-free (non-physics-based) methods: moving-principal-component analysis and robust-regression analysis. The configurations that are found do not correspond to configurations that would be selected using engineering experience only. Results demonstrate that the proposed approach is able to provide engineers with decision support in determining the appropriate number of sensors and identifying the most informative locations that lead to more rational measurement system designs.

[1]  Michele Meo,et al.  On the optimal sensor placement techniques for a bridge structure , 2005 .

[2]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Optimal sensor placement methodology for parametric identification of structural systems , 2004 .

[3]  A. Emin Aktan,et al.  On Structural Identification of Constructed Facilities , 1996 .

[4]  Mia Hubert,et al.  ROBPCA: A New Approach to Robust Principal Component Analysis , 2005, Technometrics.

[5]  Zhengnong Li,et al.  Optimal sensor locations for structural vibration measurements , 2004 .

[6]  Peter Brett,et al.  An approach to optimise the critical sensor locations in one-dimensional novel distributive tactile surface to maximise performance , 2003 .

[7]  Junjie Li,et al.  Virus coevolution partheno-genetic algorithms for optimal sensor placement , 2008, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[8]  Reza Baradaran Kazemzadeh,et al.  PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  J. Beck,et al.  Entropy-Based Optimal Sensor Location for Structural Model Updating , 2000 .

[10]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Configuring and enhancing measurement systems for damage identification , 2009, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[11]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Dynamic behavior and vibration control of a tensegrity structure , 2010 .

[12]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Methodologies for model-free data interpretation of civil engineering structures , 2010 .

[13]  Dongsheng Li,et al.  The connection between effective independence and modal kinetic energy methods for sensor placement , 2007 .

[14]  Wei Liu,et al.  Optimal sensor placement for spatial lattice structure based on genetic algorithms , 2008 .

[15]  A. Rama Mohan Rao,et al.  Optimal placement of sensors for structural system identification and health monitoring using a hybrid swarm intelligence technique , 2007 .

[16]  H. F. Zhou,et al.  Modal Flexibility Analysis of Cable‐Stayed Ting Kau Bridge for Damage Identification , 2008, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..