Role of E × B drift in double-peak density distribution for the new lower tungsten divertor with unfavorable B t on EAST

Doubly peaked density distribution is expected not only to affect the plasma-wetted area at divertor plates, but also to correlate with the upstream density profile and hence characteristics of magnetohydrodynamic activities in tokamak plasmas (Wang et al 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 195002). Clarifying its origin is important to understand the compatibility between power/particle exhausts in divertor and high-performance core plasmas required by present-day and future tokamak devices. In this paper, we analyze the double-peak density profile appearing in the modeling during the physics design phase of the new lower tungsten divertor for EAST by using a comprehensive 2D SOLPS-ITER code package, including full drifts and currents, with a concentration on an unfavorable magnetic field (ion B × ∇B drift is directed away from the primary X-point). The results indicate that E × B drift induced by the plasma potential gradient near the target, which is closely related to the divertor state, plays essential roles in the formation of a double-peak profile at the target: (1) large enough radial E p × B drift produces a broadened high-density region; (2) strong poloidal E r × B drift drives a significant particle sink and creates a valley on the high-density profile. Thus, the simulation results can explain why this kind of doubly peaked density profile is usually observed at the high-recycling divertor regime. In addition, features of the double-peak ion saturation current distribution measured in preliminary experiments testing the new lower tungsten divertor are qualitatively consistent with the simulations.

[1]  L. Wang,et al.  Characteristics of double-peaked particle deposition at divertor target plates in the EAST tokamak , 2021, Nuclear Fusion.

[2]  M. Groth,et al.  Effects of divertor electrical drifts on particle distribution and detachment near the divertor target plate in DIII-D , 2021 .

[3]  Y. Zhang,et al.  Physics design of new lower tungsten divertor for long-pulse high-power operations in EAST , 2021 .

[4]  T. Osborne,et al.  First Evidence of Local E×B Drift in the Divertor Influencing the Structure and Stability of Confined Plasma near the Edge of Fusion Devices. , 2020, Physical review letters.

[5]  B. Duval,et al.  X-point potential well formation in diverted tokamaks with unfavorable magnetic field direction , 2020, Nuclear Fusion.

[6]  T. Rognlien,et al.  Role of poloidal E × B drift in divertor heat transport in DIII‐D , 2019, Contributions to Plasma Physics.

[7]  V. Rozhansky,et al.  Physics basis for the first ITER tungsten divertor , 2019, Nuclear Materials and Energy.

[8]  S. Voskoboynikov,et al.  Speed-up of SOLPS-ITER code for tokamak edge modeling , 2018, Nuclear Fusion.

[9]  R. Pitts,et al.  The influence of plasma-surface interaction on the performance of tungsten at the ITER divertor vertical targets , 2018 .

[10]  G. F. Nallo,et al.  Modelling of mitigation of the power divertor loading for the EU DEMO through Ar injection , 2018 .

[11]  T. Petrie,et al.  Effect of heating scheme on SOL width in DIII-D and EAST , 2017 .

[12]  S. Voskoboynikov,et al.  Presentation of the new SOLPS-ITER code package for tokamak plasma edge modelling , 2016 .

[13]  M. Groth,et al.  Influence of the E  ×  B drift in high recycling divertors on target asymmetries , 2015 .

[14]  W. Fundamenski,et al.  Edge and divertor physics with reversed toroidal field in JET , 2005 .

[15]  S. Voskoboynikov,et al.  Simulation of tokamak edge plasma including self-consistent electric fields , 2001 .

[16]  G. Matthews,et al.  Possible explanation for doubly peaked profiles at the divertor target in JET , 2001 .

[17]  D. Ryutov,et al.  Two-dimensional electric fields and drifts near the magnetic separatrix in divertor tokamaks , 1999 .

[18]  Gary D. Porter,et al.  Influence of E×B and ∇B drift terms in 2-D edge/SOL transport simulations , 1999 .

[19]  T. Evans,et al.  Flow reversal, convection, and modeling in the DIII-D divertor , 1998 .

[20]  A. Loarte,et al.  Interpretation of ion flux and electron temperature profiles at the JET divertor target during high recycling and detached discharges , 1997 .

[21]  P. Stangeby,et al.  The ion velocity (Bohm–Chodura) boundary condition at the entrance to the magnetic presheath in the presence of diamagnetic and E×B drifts in the scrape‐off layer , 1995 .