Role of E × B drift in double-peak density distribution for the new lower tungsten divertor with unfavorable B t on EAST
暂无分享,去创建一个
R. Ding | Ang Li | Huiqian Wang | Liang Wang | L. Meng | Jichan Xu | Xiaoju Liu | Y. Tao | G. Jia | Sizheng Zhu | H. Si | Qingquan Yang | Jin Guo | C. Gan | Yi-feng Wang | Guosheng Xu | Wen-Ting Guo | Lin Yu
[1] L. Wang,et al. Characteristics of double-peaked particle deposition at divertor target plates in the EAST tokamak , 2021, Nuclear Fusion.
[2] M. Groth,et al. Effects of divertor electrical drifts on particle distribution and detachment near the divertor target plate in DIII-D , 2021 .
[3] Y. Zhang,et al. Physics design of new lower tungsten divertor for long-pulse high-power operations in EAST , 2021 .
[4] T. Osborne,et al. First Evidence of Local E×B Drift in the Divertor Influencing the Structure and Stability of Confined Plasma near the Edge of Fusion Devices. , 2020, Physical review letters.
[5] B. Duval,et al. X-point potential well formation in diverted tokamaks with unfavorable magnetic field direction , 2020, Nuclear Fusion.
[6] T. Rognlien,et al. Role of poloidal E × B drift in divertor heat transport in DIII‐D , 2019, Contributions to Plasma Physics.
[7] V. Rozhansky,et al. Physics basis for the first ITER tungsten divertor , 2019, Nuclear Materials and Energy.
[8] S. Voskoboynikov,et al. Speed-up of SOLPS-ITER code for tokamak edge modeling , 2018, Nuclear Fusion.
[9] R. Pitts,et al. The influence of plasma-surface interaction on the performance of tungsten at the ITER divertor vertical targets , 2018 .
[10] G. F. Nallo,et al. Modelling of mitigation of the power divertor loading for the EU DEMO through Ar injection , 2018 .
[11] T. Petrie,et al. Effect of heating scheme on SOL width in DIII-D and EAST , 2017 .
[12] S. Voskoboynikov,et al. Presentation of the new SOLPS-ITER code package for tokamak plasma edge modelling , 2016 .
[13] M. Groth,et al. Influence of the E × B drift in high recycling divertors on target asymmetries , 2015 .
[14] W. Fundamenski,et al. Edge and divertor physics with reversed toroidal field in JET , 2005 .
[15] S. Voskoboynikov,et al. Simulation of tokamak edge plasma including self-consistent electric fields , 2001 .
[16] G. Matthews,et al. Possible explanation for doubly peaked profiles at the divertor target in JET , 2001 .
[17] D. Ryutov,et al. Two-dimensional electric fields and drifts near the magnetic separatrix in divertor tokamaks , 1999 .
[18] Gary D. Porter,et al. Influence of E×B and ∇B drift terms in 2-D edge/SOL transport simulations , 1999 .
[19] T. Evans,et al. Flow reversal, convection, and modeling in the DIII-D divertor , 1998 .
[20] A. Loarte,et al. Interpretation of ion flux and electron temperature profiles at the JET divertor target during high recycling and detached discharges , 1997 .
[21] P. Stangeby,et al. The ion velocity (Bohm–Chodura) boundary condition at the entrance to the magnetic presheath in the presence of diamagnetic and E×B drifts in the scrape‐off layer , 1995 .