Fast phonology and the Bimodal Interactive Activation Model

Many computational models of visual word recognition and reading postulate a central role for phonology. None, however, has successfully simulated one key phenomenon associated with fast-acting phonological influences during word recognition: masked phonological priming (e.g., bloo primes BLUE better than blai primes BLUE). The tricky issue for computational models is not only to simulate such masked phonological priming effects, but at the same time to correctly read aloud irregular words. This double challenge constitutes a new benchmark phenomenon: the fast-phonology test. It has been previously shown that the dual route model of reading aloud (DRC) does not pass the fast-phonology test, unless it is assumed that lexical decisions are always made on the basis of lexical phonological activation. Here we show that the Bimodal Interactive Activation Model (BIAM), an extension of the interactive activation model, can pass the fast-phonology test, while maintaining the ability to discriminate between words and nonwords on the basis of orthographic activation alone. The BIAM achieves this by virtue of implementing a fast parallel mapping of letters onto input phonemes rather than output phonemes as in DRC. It is argued that the BIAM provides an improved architecture for a general model of visual word recognition and reading.

[1]  Conrad Perry,et al.  Speed of lexical and nonlexical processing in French: The case of the regularity effect , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  J. Grainger,et al.  Sequential Effects of Phonological Priming in Visual Word Recognition , 2005, Psychological science.

[3]  Kevin Diependaele,et al.  Masked repetition and phonological priming within and across modalities. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  D. Norris A quantitative multiple-levels model of reading aloud. , 1994 .

[5]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[6]  J Grainger,et al.  List context effects on masked phonological priming in the lexical decision task , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  J. Grainger,et al.  Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: effects of relative prime-target frequency. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Kristi A. Kiyonaga,et al.  The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation. , 1993, Psychological science.

[9]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phonological Priming by Masked Nonword Primes in the Lexical Decision Task , 1998 .

[10]  A. Jacobs,et al.  The incremental priming technique: A method for determining within-condition priming effects , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The Development of Spelling-Sound Relationships in a Model of Phonological Reading , 1998 .

[12]  J Grainger,et al.  Effects of Orthography are Independent of Phonology in Masked form Priming , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[13]  Nurit Gronau,et al.  Prelexical phonologic computation in a deep orthography: Evidence from backward masking in Hebrew , 1997 .

[14]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud , 1999 .

[15]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[16]  R. Frost,et al.  SOA does not Reveal the Absolute Time Course of Cognitive Processing in Fast Priming Experiments. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[17]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming , 1991 .

[18]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.

[19]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Visual and Phonological Codes in Letter and Word Recognition: Evidence from Incremental Priming , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  J. Grainger,et al.  Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters , 2004 .

[21]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[22]  M. Ahissar,et al.  Are phonological effects fragile? The effect of luminance and exposure duration on form priming and phonological priming , 2003 .

[23]  S. Lupker,et al.  Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Treebank Penn,et al.  Linguistic Data Consortium , 1999 .

[25]  M Brysbaert,et al.  Prelexical phonological coding of visual words in Dutch: Automatic after all , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[26]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Computational modelling of the masked onset priming effect in reading aloud , 2010 .

[27]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[28]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Masked Orthographic and Phonological Priming in Visual Word Recognition and Naming: Cross-Task Comparisons , 1996 .

[29]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: insights from connectionist models. , 1999, Psychological review.

[30]  J. Grainger,et al.  Phonology and Orthography in Visual Word Recognition: Evidence from Masked Non-Word Priming , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[31]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. , 2007, Psychological review.

[32]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[33]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Cross-code consistency effects in visual word recognition. , 2008 .

[34]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Testing a semistochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  J. Grainger,et al.  Phonology and Orthography in Visual Word Recognition: Effects of Masked Homophone Primes , 1994 .

[36]  J Grainger,et al.  The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  M. Turvey,et al.  Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[38]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. , 2003 .

[39]  K. Rastle,et al.  Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  G. Stone,et al.  Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. , 1990, Psychological review.

[41]  R. Frost Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. , 1998 .

[42]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[43]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Phonological Information Provides Early Sources of Constraint in the Processing of Letter Strings , 1995 .

[44]  R Frost,et al.  Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  G. Tononi,et al.  Sleep and synaptic homeostasis: a hypothesis , 2003, Brain Research Bulletin.

[46]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[47]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Nonword pronunciation and models of word recognition. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.